a
“
exposed” mannan. The binding rates for the fusion protein on
applicable to many different proteins, allows immobilization by
self-organization, as well as a swift regeneration of the surface.
The final step of the entire assay as shown in Figure 1 would
be the immobilization of a biotinylated protein, typically a
biotinylated antibody capturing the analyte. This has been also
tested in these studies, but until now only with little success
because of inactivation of the antibody. The reason for this
phenomenon is not clear in the moment. The reason can be
insufficient washing steps, inappropriate buffer systems or
denaturation of antibodies by contact with uncoated chip areas.
The solution for this problem is a main topic of ongoing
research.
different mannan coated PPy surfaces are shown in Table 2.
3
.4. AFM Measurements
After the SPR measurements, chips were carefully removed out
of the SPR device and analysed by AFM as depicted in Figure 8.
An area of 2.5 ꢃ 2.5 μm was observed.
In general, the surface showed a somewhat rough, but
uniform coating. Results of the roughness study are given in
Table 3. The surface after mannan coating showed structures of
about 50 nm with round or oval shapes. Due to the polymeric
structure of mannan, these shapes do fit rather well to its
polysaccharide structure.
Supporting Information
After loading with the fusion protein (43 kDa), the surface
looks quite similar. As it is visible in Figure 8(d), a fine supra-
structure can be observed. This could be caused by the ConA-Sav
fusion protein. Generally, the loading seems to be rather
homogeneous. However, because of the roughness of the
mannan-loaded surface (Figure 8(c)), the deposition step needs
further improvement. For example, by optimization of the
concentration of the mannan solution during the loading step,
additionally the mix-mode of the SPR device could be modified.
Supporting Information is available from the Wiley Online Library or from
the author.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Keywords
4
. Conclusion
atomic force microscopy (AFM), electro polymerization, N-substituted
pyrroles, poly-pyrroles (PPy), surface plasmon resonance (SPR)
Four different PPy surfaces could be successfully established.
Different gold SPR chips, modified with the same PPy, showed very
similar binding characteristics. The so produced PPy films adhered
strongly to the gold layer and are stable within a broad pH range.
Widely used dextran surfaces show a negative charge above pH 3.5,
Received: January 15, 2018
Revised: March 26, 2017
Published online:
[15]
this could lead to unspecific interactions with proteins. By using
different NSPs the net charge of the layer can be controlled. Binding
inhibitorscovalently tothePPy couldeliminate theriskofunspecific
interactions. The rough surface evaluated by AFM measurements
could be optimized towards a smoother surface by carefully
improving and modifying the electro-polymerization as well as
concentrations of the monomeric pyrroles in solution. Real time
monitoring of the electrochemical polymerization process with the
SPR technique is something that could be adopted for a complete
control of the whole process. The following immobilization steps
have some potential for optimization. Out of these surfaces, the
pyrrole-N-C16 co-polymer surface as well as the PHCP co-polymer
surface with and without chemical activation gave sufficient results
in a binding assay with the ConA-Sav fusion protein.
[1] J. M. Guisan, Enzym. Microb. Tech. 1988, 10, 375.
[
[
[
2] E. P. Diamandis, T. K. Christopoulos, Clin. Chem. 1991, 37, 625.
3] W. I. Weis, Anu. Rev. Biochem. 1996, 65, 441.
4] I. J. Goldstein, C. M. Reichert, A. Misaki, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1974,
234, 283.
[
[
5] I. J. Goldstein, C. E. Hollerman, E. E. Smith, Biochemistry 1965, 4, 876.
6] O. H. Laitinen, H. R. Nordlund, V. P. Hytönen, M. S. Kulomaa, Trends
Biotechnol. 2007, 25, 269.
[16]
[7] J. DeChancie, K. N. Houk, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 5419.
[8] R. B. M. Schasfoort, A. J. Tudos, Handbook of Surface Plasmon
Resonance, ISBN: 978-0-85404-267-8 Royal Society of Chemistry,
Cambridge 2008, pp. 35.
[9] N. Clauson-Kaas, F. Limborg, J. Kakstorp, Acta Chem. Scand. 1948, 2, 109.
[
[
10] N. Clauson-Kaas, Acta Chem. Scand. 1952, 6, 667.
11] B. S. Gourlay, P. P. Molesworth, J. H. Ryan, J. A. Smith, Tetrahedron
Lett. 2006, 47, 799.
12] N. Dassinger, D. Vornicescu, S. Merkel, M. Kehrel, E. Dayyoub,
U. Bakowsky, M. Keusgen, Phys. Status Solidi A 2012, 5, 832.
13] F. P. Schwarz, K. D. Puri, R. G. Bhat, A. Surolia, J. Biol. Chem. 1993,
A simple regeneration of the PHCP co-polymer chip surface
by 10% methyl α-D- mannopyranoside solution was possible in a
final washing step. The regeneration rate of the surface was up to
[
4
3%, thus providing the possibility to reuse the chip surface and
allows for regaining the analyte.
[
There are further variations of the method thinkable. A very
promising variation, which is under investigation, is a co-
polymer with N , N -bis(carboxymethyl)-N -pyrrolyl-L-lysine
2
68, 7668.
[14] K. Shimura, K. Kasai, Anal. Biochem. 1995, 227, 186.
[15] M. Ritzefeld, N. Sewald, J. Amino Acids 2011, 2012, 816032.
[16] L. Tian, Y. Feng, Y. Qi, B. Wang, X. Fu, Y. Chen, J. Polym. Res. 2011,
2
2
6
2þ
2þ
(S 5) which, after treatment with Ni or Co salts, is suitable
1
8, 2379.
for the immobilization of His-tagged proteins. This method is
Phys. Status Solidi A 2018, 1800030
1800030 (6 of 6)
© 2018 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim