Angewandte
Chemie
À
bond to form quantitatively the two uncommon crystalline
solids 3 and 4 (Scheme 2 and Figure 1).
Si O units, thus leading to a positive charge located at the
amino function counterbalanced by a negative charge located
at the oxygen atom. Thus, there is no hint of the expected
silanol-like structure (Si-OH-Zn; A in Scheme 1) as proposed
for molecular metal silanediols under aqueous conditions (e.g.
the thermolysin/silanediol complex).[11] Instead, heretofore
unknown silanolate complexes with central Si-O-Zn frag-
ments are formed that are highly stable in the presence of
water (B in Scheme 1). Quantum chemical calculations
[B3LYP/6-31 + G(d)][17] on the silanolate 3 (Si-O-Zn) and its
hypothetical silanol (Si-OH-Zn; hydrogen atom not bound to
nitrogen) further provided an energetic preference for 3 of
157 kJmolÀ1, thus confirming the experimental observation.
How can this uncommon stability be explained? The
central R2R’Si-O-ZnX2X’ units of 3 and 4 possess fourfold-
coordinated zinc atoms comparable to the pseudo-tetrahedral
coordination geometry of zinc in many of its coordination
Compound 3 crystallized from acetone/water in the
monoclinic space group P21/n as colorless needles, and 4
crystallized from acetone/acetonitrile/water in the monoclinic
space group P21/c as colorless plates.[16] Compound 3 forms a
compounds.[10,18] All O Zn bond lengths are comparable, with
À
À
À
1.981(4) ꢀ (O Zn) for 3 and 1.975(2) (O1 Zn1) and
À
1.955(3) ꢀ (O1 Zn2) for 4. These distances are significantly
longer than the sum of the covalent radii of oxygen and zinc
(1.89 ꢀ), but they are in the same range as the zinc–oxygen
distances in various, mostly ionic, zinc silicates such as
willemite (mean value 1.98 ꢀ).[19] Consequently, the high
stability of 3 and 4 under aqueous conditions can be under-
stood by charge separation between the positively charged
nitrogen atom and the negatively charged oxygen atom. It is
well known that zwitterionic species strongly stabilize molec-
ular structures, for example, in many biological systems (such
as amino acids).[20] Analogously, the intramolecular zwitter-
ionic effect present in 3 and 4 enables their synthesis and
causes their extraordinary high stability in the presence of
water.
Nevertheless, the following central question emerged:
Are the shown structures of 3 and 4 maintained in solution?
To answer this decisive question, we performed detailed
NMR spectroscopic studies in solution and the solid state (all
spectra are shown in the Supporting Information). In both
cases, only one defined compound could be identified in
solution, thus underlining the homogeneity of the bulk
material, not only in the crystal (the homogeneity of the
crystalline material was further confirmed by powder X-ray
diffraction analysis). The 29Si NMR spectra of 3 and 4 in
solution showed one resonance signal each at d = 4.7 (3) and
6.3 ppm (4); these chemical shifts are in the same range as
those in the solid-state spectra. NMR spectroscopic quantum
chemical calculations [GAIO/B3LYP/IGLO-II//B3LYP/6-
31 + G(d)][17] on 3 and 4 confirmed the chemical shifts of
the 29Si signals in this range. Only one resonance was
identified for 3 (d = 3.7 ppm) in the solid state, whereas two
signals were located for 4 (d = 6.6 and 6.9 ppm). This
observation is in agreement with the X-ray structural analysis
of 4, which possesses two molecules in the asymmetric unit,
which results in two signals (the same is true for the 13C and
15N signals). The 13C signals of both molecules have compa-
rable values in the solid state and in solution. It is noteworthy
that the 13C signals of the piperidinomethyl groups are shifted
downfield compared to the reactant 1, which is a clear
indication of protonated nitrogen atoms. A further interesting
Figure 1. Molecular structures of 3 (top) and 4 (bottom, one of two
molecules in the asymmetric unit). Selected bond lengths [ꢁ]: 3: Br1–
Zn 2.3950(11), Br2–Zn 2.3359(10), O–Si 1.621(4), O–Zn 1.981(4), O–
Zn’ 1.983(4), Zn–O’ 1.983(4), symmetry transformation ’: Àx, Ày+1,
Àz+2; 4: O1–Si1 1.626(3), O1–Zn2 1.955(3), O1–Zn1 1.975(2), O3–
Zn2 1.971(3), O5–Zn2 1.959(3), O6–Zn1 2.001(3), O7–Zn2 1.976(3),
O8–Zn2 1.921(3).
dimeric structure with an inversion center located in the
middle of its Zn-O-Zn’-O’ ring. The asymmetric unit of 4
contains two molecules. In comparison to 3, only one R2R’SiO
unit is present in 4 with two zinc atoms coordinated to the
oxygen atom at silicon. To complete its coordination sphere,
each zinc atom is coordinated by three additional oxygen
atoms of the acetate groups; two acetate units bridge both
zinc atoms. Consequently, the successful isolation of these
structures demonstrates the following two facts: 1) Contrary
to previous opinion, molecular metallasilanolates are obvi-
ously stable under aqueous conditions. 2) Zinc compounds
À
are able to cleave Si O bonds. Below, the uncommon
structures of 3 and 4 will be discussed in detail, with special
focus on their high stability in the presence of water.
Afterwards, we will take a closer look at the bond cleavage
process.
In the in the X-ray diffraction analyses of 3 and 4,
hydrogen atoms were found and freely refined at the nitrogen
atoms in both molecules and not at the oxygen atoms of the
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 8074 –8077
ꢀ 2009 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
8075