3324
J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 110, No. 7, 15 February 1999
Ni et al.
power dependence of the C3Hϩ2 signal shows that most of the
C3H2 results from two UV photons, even when the UV laser
fluence is as low as 5 mJ/cm2. At very low fluence, a small
amount of C3H2 may be produced by one photon photolysis,
via
an energy of 88.7 kcal/mol could be rationalized in terms of
the structure S (cis), 2 1A state. In this state, the acetylenic
Ј
2
C–H bond distance increases 1.131 Å and there are no bar-
riers to the elimination of this H atom. The theoretical cal-
culations also show that there are two molecular H2 elimina-
tion channels on the ground state surface, namely, 1, 1 and
1,3 elimination. If the excited state surfaces cross with the
ground state surface, internal conversion of the electronically
excited propyne to the ground state surface should compete
with dissociation on the excited surface. The present studies
show that most of the excited propyne molecules dissociate
through the H atom elimination channel. The relatively small
amount of H2 elimination from propyne compared to the
amount from allene explains why the C3 yield from propyne
is smaller than the yield from allene, even though the pro-
pyne absorption cross section at 193 nm is larger than the
allene cross section.
H3C3Hϩh→C3H2ϩH2 .
͑6͒
The amount of C3H2 produced at zero fluence was not larger
than 0.5% of C3H3 . The difference between the mϭ38/m
ϭ39 ratio in allene and propyne suggests that the photodis-
sociation mechanism is different for these two geometrical
isomers. Unequal ratios of mϭ38/mϭ39 also imply that dis-
sociation occurs before complete isomerization for these two
molecules. If there is any isomerization of propyne to allene,
it would be less than 7% of the excited molecules.
A very small peak in the TOF spectra is observed at
mass 14, which would correspond to reaction ͑4͒, which was
originally proposed by Okabe.10 This peak was so small that
it could not be further analyzed. It does show that if both of
these products are formed via dissociation on the ground
state surface, the initial geometry of the reactant affects the
branching ratio. This further implies that redistribution of
energy and isomerization do not occur as fast as dissociation.
The results that have been obtained can now be com-
pared with the theoretical calculations of the ground and ex-
cited state potential surfaces of allene and propyne.3,4,11–13
The calculations on the excited states of allene in the 193-nm
region suggest that the initial excitation is to a state allowed
by vibronic interaction. This state is planar and thus this
excitation imparts an internal rotation to the CH2 group in
the excited state.3 The photoexcitation process is followed by
rapid internal conversion of the S1 state to the S0 state via a
seam of crossing. Once the molecule is on the ground state
surface there are a variety of options available to it. It can
undergo H and H2 elimination,3,4 isomerization to propyne,
cyclopropene, propenylidene, and trans-vinylmethylene, as
well as fragmentation to methylene and acetylene.11–14 The
highest barrier to isomerization between all of the species on
the ground state surface is 66.1 kcal/mol, which is smaller
than the 148 kcal/mol of energy available after internal con-
version. By comparison of the theoretical potential energy
surfaces and the fragment translational energy of allene,1,3,4
one can conclude that H and H2 eliminations in allene can be
explained by dissociation on the ground state surface.
CONCLUSIONS
VUV laser photoionization has been used to determine
the heavy fragments produced in the laser photodissociation
of allene and propyne. These studies have been performed in
a molecular beam under collisionless conditions. It has been
shown that very low laser energies have to be used to insure
that the products that are observed are not formed by second-
ary photolysis. The results of the studies indicate that the
major primary process in both allene and propyne is H elimi-
nation. In addition to H atom elimination, two other channels
are observed in allene, namely 1,1 hydrogen molecule elimi-
nation channel and C–C bond rupture. The channel that pro-
duces CH2 observed in allene must involve a more compli-
cated rearrangement reaction. The different ratio of various
dissociation channels in allene and propyne suggests that the
dissociation mechanisms of these two molecules are differ-
ent. The geometry on the excited state surface can affect the
relative value of internal conversion and direct dissociation,
and the isomerization between these two molecules is not as
fast as the dissociation. It is likely that H atom production in
propyne occurs in the excited state, but in allene it occurs on
the ground state surface. The H and H2 signal ratios in allene
are similar to the relative yields observed in the earlier pho-
tofragment spectroscopy studies. This suggests that the sig-
nal sizes are a fair measure of the relative concentrations of
the heavy fragments.
The carbon–carbon bond rupture channels in allene have
not yet been theoretically investigated but it is clear that they
are different in these two molecules. Carbon–carbon bond
rupture in allene will probably have a barrier because of the
H atom migration. The earlier theoretical calculations sug-
gest that H migration can lead to vinylmethylene or cyclo-
propene followed by a ring closing step, which could decom-
pose to form CH2ϩC2H2 .12 There is not enough energy at
193 nm to form the only other spin-allowed channel, i.e.,
CH2(a 1A1)ϩH2C2(X 1A1), because the threshold energy is
157.1 kcal/mol. Calculations are in progress to determine the
height of this barrier and the nature of the transition state.
Theoretical calculations of propyne by Mebel et al.4 sug-
gested that the apparent preference for elimination of an H
atom with a bond strength of 130.5 kcal/mol over one with
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This project is supported by the China Petroleum Re-
search Corporation. J.D.H. and Y.T.C. also acknowledge the
support of the National Science Council of R.O.C. under
Grant No. NSC88-2113-M-001-031, and W.M.I. the support
of the Alexander Von Humboldt Foundation and NASA’s
Planetary Atmospheres Program under Grant No. NAG5-
4711.
1 W. M. Jackson, Deon S. Anex, R. E. Continetti, B. A. Balko, and Y. T.
Lee, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 7327 ͑1991͒.
2 X. Song, Y. Bao, R. S. Urdahl, J. N. Gosine, and W. M. Jackson, Chem.
Phys. Lett. 217, 216 ͑1994͒.