J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 1557-1558
1557
Direct Synthesis of Fused, Bicyclic γ-Butyrolactones
via Tandem Reductive Cyclization-Carbonylation
of Tethered Enals and Enones
William E. Crowe* and An T. Vu
Figure 1. Diagnostic 1H NMR peaks for metallacycles 2b and 3b and
γ-butyrolactone 4b.
Department of Chemistry, Emory UniVersity
Atlanta, Georgia 30322
Scheme 1
ReceiVed October 25, 1995
γ-Butyrolactones are ubiquitous in Nature, occurring in about
10% or more of structurally elucidated natural products.1 An
attractive route to this ring system is the [2 + 2 + 1] approach
illustrated in Scheme 1A (X ) O). Although a similar approach
has been successfully employed for the construction of five-
membered-ring carbocycles,2 the application of this route to
heterocycle synthesis is not known. Herein we report the first
examples of this useful reaction.
Takaya has shown that 1-oxa-5-titanacyclopentanes, derived
from insertion of aldehydes into Cp*2Ti(CH2dCH2) (Cp* )
η5-C5Me5), react with CO to give stable carbonylated metalla-
cycles by insertion of CO into the Ti-C bond (Scheme 1B).3
No products arising from insertion into the stronger Ti-O bond
were observed. Takaya’s carbonylated metallacycles were
remarkably stable with respect to reductive elimination. Slow
decomposition was observed at 210 °C; ethylene and CO were
liberated, but no γ-butyrolactone products were detected.
In 1990, Whitby and Hewlett4 reported that δ,ꢀ-unsaturated
carbonyl compounds react with Cp2Ti(PMe3)25 to afford bicyclic
titanium oxametallacycles (eq 1). In their initial report, the
authors briefly described several metallacycle cleavage protocols
but noted that “unfortunately, ...conditions for new carbon-
carbon bond formation have not yet been found.” We6 and
Buchwald7 recently showed that, in the presence of 1 equiv of
an appropriate silane reagent, a titanium-catalyzed reaction is
possible. Reductive metallacycle cleavage, allowing for ca-
talysis, takes place via σ-bond metathesis followed by reductive
elimination as depicted in eq 2. This reaction sequence,
however, results in the formation of a C-H bond upon
metallacycle cleavage. To the best of our knowledge, carbon-
carbon bond forming reactions of these titanium oxametalla-
cycles still have not been reported. Surprisingly, carbonylation
does not appear to have been studied.
Table 1. Yield Summary for Tandem Reductive
Cyclization-Carbonylation Reactionsa
a Reaction conditions: (i) Cp2Ti(PMe3)2, pentane, 25 °C, 2 h; (ii)
CO (1 atm), pentane, 25 °C, 12 h; (iii) air (1 atm), pentane, 25 °C, 4
h. b Reaction yields, indicated by column heading, are for the overall
transformation carried out without isolation of organometallic inter-
mediates. All reported yields are for isolated products purified by
crystallization or column chromatography. c Reference 2. d Improved
yield. e Low yield is due to the high solubility of the product in pentane
hampering product crystallization. Reaction yield is much higher.
f Formed as a mixture of diastereomers (diastereomer ratios: 1.5:1 for
2c-4c; 2.3:1 for 2d-4d; 4.5:1 for 2f-4f; 1.8:1 for 2g-4g). g A
reasonably pure product could not be isolated from the reaction mixture
by crystallization.
Titanium metallacycles 2a-l were prepared by reacting
substrates 1a-l (Table 1) with Cp2Ti(PMe3)2 (eq 1). Upon
treatment of complexes 2a-i with CO (1 atm, 25 °C),
carbonylated metallacycles 3a-i were formed via insertion of
CO into the Ti-C bond (Table 1). As expected, the carbony-
lated metallacycles did not spontaneously undergo reductive
elimination at room temperature and could be isolated as purple,
(1) Hoffmann, H. M. R.; Rabe, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1985,
24, 94-110.
(2) See, for example: (a) Lee, B. Y.; Chung, Y. K.; Jeong, N.; Lee, Y.
S.; Hwang, S. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 8793-8794. (b) Jamison,
T. F.; Shambayati, S.; Crowe, W. E.; Schreiber, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1994, 116, 5505-5506. (c) Berk, S. C.; Grossman, R. B.; Buchwald, S. L.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 8593-8601. (d) Bernardes, V.; Verdaguer,
X.; Kardos, N.; Riera, A.; Moyano, A.; Pericas, M. A.; Greene, A. E.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 575-578. (e) Krafft, M. E.; Scott, I. L.; Romero,
R. H.; Feibelmann, S.; Vanpelt, C. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 7199-
7207. (f) Schore, N. E. Org. React. (N.Y.) 1991, 40, 1-90. (g) Negishi, E.;
Swanson, D. R.; Cederbaum, F. E.; Takahashi, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987,
28, 917-920.
(4) Hewlett, D. F.; Whitby, R. J. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1990,
1684-1686.
(5) (a) Kool, L. B.; Rausch, M. D.; Alt, H. G.; Herberhold, M.; Thewalt,
U.; Wolf, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1985, 24 , 394. (b) Binger, P.;
Mu¨ller, P.; Benn, R.; Rufinska, A.; Gabor, B.; Kru¨ger, C.; Betz, P. Chem.
Ber. 1989, 122, 1035.
(6) Crowe, W. E.; Rachita, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 6787-
6788.
(7) Kablaoui, N. M.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117,
6785-6786.
(3) Mashima, K.; Haraguchi, H.; Oyoshi, A.; Sakai, N.; Takaya, H.
Organometallics 1991, 10, 2731-2736.
0002-7863/96/1518-1557$12.00/0 © 1996 American Chemical Society