338
BOHNEN, GAMEZ, AND BLACKMOND
Addition of cinchonidine (seven times more than used in substrate and its hemiketal is rapid on the time scale of the
the experiment shown in Fig. 2) afforded completion of hydrogenation reaction. In this case, the sum of the rates
the process of hemiketal formation for the E4759 sample. of (hemiketal formation + hydrogenation) is proportional
Thus, it may be concluded that under some conditions the to the hydrogenation rate. The equilibrium is established
hemiketal equilibrium may indeed be perturbed by the en- by both acid and base catalysis. This work points out the
suing hydrogenation step when the E4759 catalyst is used. advantages of using multiple independent measures of in-
stantaneous reaction rate as a means of deriving mechanis-
Combined Kinetic Measurements
tic information about reaction processes.
This work shows that the use of multiple kinetic tools
provides a powerful mechanistic approach to understand-
ing complex reactions. Because they rely on different phys-
ical measurements to assess the same reaction parameter
(reaction rate), the combination of hydrogen uptake and
reaction calorimetry teaches us more about the hydrogena-
tion reaction than either can alone. The agreement between
the two methods during the initial transient period suggests
that hemiketal formation plays no special role in the rising
initial rate which was observed. This agreement also sup-
ports the suggestion that hydrogen is consumed principally
in the main reaction and not in side reactions of impurities,
unless such side reactions coincidentally exhibit rates and
thermodynamic heats of reaction identical to the rate and
heat of reaction of ethyl pyruvate and are not detectable in
the product analysis.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Donation ofa Pt/Al2O3 catalyst from PreciousMetals/Activated Metals
Corporation is gratefully acknowledged. We thank the Max-Planck-
Gesellschaft for financial support of this work and W. Ko¨nen for exper-
imental assistance. Helpful discussions with J. S. Bradley and A. Pfaltz
(MPI) and Y. Sun (Merck & Co. Inc.) are also gratefully acknowledged.
REFERENCES
1a. Blaser, H.-U., Jalett, H. P., Mu¨ller, M., and Studer, M., Catal. Today
37, 441 (1997).
1b. Pfaltz, A., and Heinz, T., Topics Catal. 4, 229 (1997).
1c. Wells, P. B., and Wilkinson, A. G., Topics Catal. 5, 39 (1998).
2a. Blaser, H.-U., Jalett, H. P., and Wiehl, J., J. Mol. Catal. 68, 215
(1991).
2b. Wehrli, J. T., Baiker, A., Monti, D. M., Blaser, H.-U., and Jalett, H.,
J. Mol. Catal. 57, 245 (1989).
The excellent reproducibility of the reaction calorimetric
method (within 5% agreement) is also demonstrated in the
hemiketal reactions shown in Figs. 2 and 3 (top curve, both
figures). That the technique provides accurate data con-
cerning reaction kinetics and energetics is well known in the
pharmaceutical industry, where it was originally developed
at Ciba-Geigy(11) for carrying out safety calculations in the
design and scale-up of organic reactions such as catalytic
hydrogenation (12). For example, reaction calorimetry is
used to calculate the rate and extent of reactor tempera-
ture rise which may be expected under adiabatic reaction
conditions designed to simulate the “worst-case scenario”
of the unlikely event that a reactor loses all external cooling
capability. The requirement for accuracy in such a measure-
ment is evident, as are the potential consequences of error.
More recently, the technique has been exploited for accu-
rate kinetic measurement of intrinsic reaction properties
under well-controlled conditions (6,13). Within this focus,
reaction calorimetry can provide both fundamental mecha-
nistic information as well as practical aid in efficient process
research and development.
3a. Gamez, A., Ko¨hler, J., and Bradley, J. S., Catal. Lett., in press.
3b. Ko¨hler, J., and Bradley, J. S., Catal. Lett. 45, 203 (1997).
3c. Ko¨hler, J., and Bradley, J. S., Langmuir 14, 2730 (1998).
4. Minder, B., Mallat, T., Skrabal, P., and Baiker, A., Catal. Lett. 29, 115
(1994).
5a. Mallat, T., Bodnar, Z., Borszeky, K., and Baiker, A., J. Catal. 168, 183
(1997).
5b. Mallat, T., and Baiker, A., J. Catal. 176, 271 (1998).
6a. Wang, J., Sun, Y., LeBlond, C., Landau, R. N., Blackmond, D. G.,
J. Catal. 161, 752 (1996).
6b. LeBlond, C., Wang, J., Larsen, R. D., Orella, C. J., Forman, A. J.,
Landau, R. N., Laquidara, J., Sowa, J. R., Jr., Blackmond, D. G., and
Sun, Y-K., Thermochim. Acta 289, 189 (1996).
7. Similar arguments, with similar conclusions, may be made if the hy-
drogenation reaction is assumed to proceed through the hemiketal
rather than through ethyl pyruvate, or if it proceeds through both
pathways simultaneously.
8. The term “preequilibrium step” refers to a reversible step appearing
prior to the rate-limiting step in a reaction network. For a compre-
hensive review of the Curtin–Hammett principle, see Seeman, J. I.,
Chem. Rev. 83, 83–134 (1983).
9. Bohnen, F. M., and Blackmond, D. G., unpublished.
10a. Grunwald, J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 107, 4710 (1985).
10b. Grunwald, J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 107, 4715 (1985).
11. Regenass, W., ACS Symp. Ser. 65, 37 (1978).
12. Landau, R. N., Tung, H.-H., and Blackmond, D. G., Ind. Eng. Chem.
Res. 33, 814 (1994).
CONCLUSIONS
13a. Landau, R. N., Singh, U. K., Gortsema, F. P., Sun, Y., Blackmond, D.
G., Gomolka, S. C., Lam, T., and Futran, M., J. Catal. 157, 201 (1995).
13b. Girgis, M. J., Ziltener, C. A., Prashad, M., Har, D., Yoskowitz,
R. S., Basso, B., Repic, O., Blacklock, T. J., and Landau, R. N., Organic
Process Res. Devel. 1, 339 (1997).
It is demonstrated both theoretically and experimentally
that reaction calorimetryprovidesa valid and accurate mea-
sure of the rate of hydrogenation of ꢀ-keto esters in alcohol
solvents, provided that a preequilibrium step between the