Potentiometric Saccharide Detection
A R T I C L E S
Scheme 1
aromatic system is part of a conducting polymer. The oxidation
state of a conducting polymer is readily varied and hence may
be used to tune the electronic properties of the polymer’s
backbone, thereby influencing the properties of the boronic acid
moiety and hence its complexation with saccharides. In addition,
since the complexation changes the electronic properties of the
boronic acid substituent, we can monitor the binding event by
measuring changes in the electrochemical potential of the
polymer.
Conducting polymers41 have indeed attracted considerable
attention for use in sensor applications.42 Polyaniline in particular
has been the focus of considerable research interest due to its
stability, high conductivity, ease of production, and pH depend-
ent behavior,43-45 as well as its mediation/catalytic abilities46-48
Although there have been numerous accounts in the literature
over the years on the preparation of functionalized polyanilines,
only recently has boronic acid-substituted polyaniline been
reported.49,50 In these reports, it has been shown that amino-
phenylboronic acid can be polymerized as a copolymer with
aniline or as a homopolymer through a fluoride-catalyzed
reaction.49,50 In the latter case, it was shown that complexation
of fluoride with the boronic acid moiety substantially reduced
the oxidation potential required for polymerization, thereby
eliminating deleterious side reactions that occur at more positive
potentials. This breakthrough has opened up the possibility of
developing new electrochemical approaches to saccharide
detection using poly(aniline boronic acid) (PABA).30
In this work we provide a detailed investigation into the nature
of the boronic acid-saccharide complexation in PABA and its
influence on the electrochemical potential of the polymer.
Specifically, we explore the effect of the changing inductive
and resonance effects that occur upon complexation on the
electrochemical potential. Our findings demonstrate that in
addition to transient fluctuations associated with short-lived pH
changes, complexation also results in a steady-state change in
the electrochemical potential that is dominated by a change in
the pKa of the polymer. Furthermore, we explore the nature of
the selectivity of the response in terms of the distribution of
saccharide isomers and the preferential complexation between
boronic acids and cis-cyclopentanediols. Molecular orbital
calculations are used to reveal the important parameters that
predict sensitivity in this system. Finally, the role of Nafion
and fluoride used in the polymerization on the sensitivity and
stability are explored.
spectroscopy,27 potentiometry,28-30 conductance measure-
ments,12,27,31 and quartz crystal microbalance measurements.27
These approaches overcome many of the issues that plague
enzymatic systems as described above. Most importantly, these
approaches are “reagentless” and their sensitivity is not de-
pendent on the mass transport of analyte.
The complexation of saccharides (as well as alkyl and
aromatic diols) with aromatic boronic acids produces a stable
boronate anion12 and a proton (1:1 stoichiometry) in the pH
range 6-10 (see Scheme 1). Since the complexation is revers-
ible,32,33 saccharides bind to aromatic boronic acids as a function
of the saccharide concentration in the physiological pH range
6.8-7.5. The percentage of complex produced with phenyl-
boronic acid at pH 7.4 is ca. 30% for D-glucose and ca. 80%
for D-fructose (boronic acid:saccharides ) 1:2 (molar ratio)).33
While the degree of complexation is significant at high molar
concentrations, for analytical applications in which the saccha-
ride concentration is relatively small, increasing the percentage
of boronate complex near neutral pH remains an important goal.
Since complexation involves a tetrahedral boronate anion as an
intermediate,34 binding constants are increased at higher pH.
Two approaches have been used successfully to increase binding
constants of phenylboronic acid with saccharides at neutral
pH: (1) the addition of neighboring amine groups35 or fluoride36
to form a stable covalent bond with the boron atom, thereby
driving the boron from sp2 to sp3 hybridization, and (2) the
addition of an electron-withdrawing group to the phenyl ring
to shift the pKa to a lower value.33 The latter approach illustrates
the interdependence of the complexation reaction and the
electronic structure of the adjoining aromatic system. This
relationship is further demonstrate by recent work where
complexation involving boronic acid-substituted ferrocene
resulted in a corresponding change in redox potential.29,37 This
shift in potential can be understood in terms of the formation
of the boronate anion, which can result in a change in the
inductive38 and resonance properties of the boron-containing
substituent.39,40
Given the above knowledge that complexation and the nature
of the aromatic system are interdependent, we have undertaken
a study of the complexation reactions occurring when the
Experimental Section
(26) Pringsheim, E.; Terpetschnig, E.; Piletsky, S. A.; Wolfbeis, O. S. AdV.
Mater. 1999, 11, 865-868.
Materials. 3-Aminophenylboronic acid hydrochloric salt, D-glucose,
D-fructose, R-methyl-D-glucoside, cis-1,2-cyclopentanediol, trans-1,2-
cyclopentanediol, cis-1,2-cyclohexanediol, trans-1,2-cyclohexanediol,
(27) Gabai, R.; Sallacan, N.; Chegel, V.; Bourenko, T.; Katz, E.; Willner, I. J.
Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 8196-8202.
(28) Kikuchi, A.; Suzuki, K.; Okabayashi, O.; Hoshino, H.; Kataoka, K.; Sakurai,
Y.; Okano, T. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 823-828.
(29) Moore, A. N. J.; Wayner, D. D. M. Can. J. Chem. 1999, 77, 681-686.
(30) Shoji, E.; Freund, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 3383-3384.
(31) Arnold, F. H.; Zheng, W. G.; S., M. A. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 167, 227-
239.
(41) Reddinger, J. L.; Reynolds, J. R. AdV. Polym. Sci. 1999, 145, 57-122.
(42) McQuade, D. T.; Pullen, A. E.; Swager, T. M. Chem. ReV. 2000, 2537-
2574.
(43) Focke, W. W.; Wnek, G. E.; Wei, Y. J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91, 5813-
(32) Consden, R.; Stanier, W. M. Nature 1952, 169, 783-785.
(33) Barker, S. A.; Chopra, A. K.; Hatt, B. W.; Somers, P. J. Carbohydr. Res.
1973, 26, 33-40.
5818.
(44) Genies, E. M.; Lapkowski, M.; Tsintavis, C. New J. Chem. 1988, 15, 373-
377.
(34) London, R. E.; Gabel, S. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 2562-2569.
(35) Wulff, G. Pure Appl. Chem. 1982, 54, 2093-2102.
(36) Westmark, P. R.; Valencia, L. S.; Smith, B. D. J. Chromatogr. A 1994,
664, 123-128.
(45) MacDiarmid, A. G.; Epstein, A. J. Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 1989, 88,
317-332.
(46) Shouji, E.; Buttry, D. A. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 2239-2247.
(47) Tatsuma, T.; Matsui, H.; Shouji, E.; Oyama, N. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100,
(37) Ori, A.; Shinkai, S. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1995, 1771-1772.
(38) Hine, J. Structural Effects on Equilibria in Organic Chemistry; Wiley: New
York, 1975.
14016-14021.
(48) Ohsaka, T.; Chiba, K.; Oyama, N. Nippon Kagaku Kaishi 1986, 3, 457-
464.
(39) Muetterties, E. L. The Chemistry of Boron and its Compounds; Wiley:
New York, 1967; pp 495-500.
(40) Matteson, D. S. In Progress in Boron Chemistry; Brotherton, R. J. S., H.,
Ed.; Pergamon Press: New York, 1970; Vol. 3; pp 117-176.
(49) Pringsheim, E.; Zimin, D.; Wolfbeis, O. S. AdV. Mater. 2001, 13, 819-
822.
(50) Nicolas, M.; Fabre, B.; Marchand, G.; Simonet, J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2000,
9, 1703-1710.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 124, NO. 42, 2002 12487