10.1002/cctc.202000337
ChemCatChem
COMMUNICATION
an inline FTIR coupled with a sampling point for GC samples, leading to
continuous process analysis. A more detailed description of the set-up,
parts and chemicals can be found in the SI.
Acknowledgements
This research was carried out within the HighSinc program – a
joint development between Nouryon Specialty Chemicals and
the Department of Chemical Engineering and Chemistry from
Eindhoven University of Technology. The authors thank T. di
Martino for support in SEM data acquisition.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Keywords: amines • autocatalysis • epoxidation •heterogeneous
catalysis • polyurethane foam
Figure
4. PU Foam. a) image of PU foam as used in reaction, b-d) SEM images
[1]
[2]
S. Komori, T. Karaki, Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1959, 62, 538–542.
L. L. van Dierendonck, J. Zahradnik, V. Linek, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
1998, 37, 734–738.
of PU foam cells as received and used after reactions at two temperatures
.
[3]
[4]
M. Di Serio, R. Tesser, E. Santacesaria, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005,
44, 9482–9489.
F. Sirovski, S. Mulyashov, V. Shvets, Chem. Eng. J. 2006, 117, 197–
203.
At even higher reaction temperatures, more severe structural
changes take place (Figure 4d). While in tests at ambient
conditions the PU foam proved catalytically stable over a period
of more than a month, the loss of catalytic activity at 130 °C is
attributed to: 1) thermal instability of the polyurethane foam,[20]
which has an upper service temperature at around 90 °C; and/or
2) chemical instability caused by attack of propylene oxide and
consequent decomposition of the polyurethane structure above
120 °C to polyols, ureas and amine species’.[19] Overall, the PU
foam loses its structural integrity and reduces to particles smaller
than 0.75 mm, thus passing through the filter at the reactor outlet,
and impeding further characterization of the spent sample.
[5]
[6]
[7]
R. M. Laird, R. E. Parker, J. Chem. Soc. B 1969, 1062–1068.
M. Lukosek, K. Alejski, Przem. Chem. 2016, 95, 2352–2358.
Y. N. Chiu, J. Naser, A. Easton, K. F. Ngian, K. C. Pratt, Chem. Eng.
Sci. 2010, 65, 1167–1172.
I. N. Senchenya, V. B. Kazansky, Catal. Lett. 1991, 8, 317–325.
J. Trejbal, M. Petrisko, J. Pašek, Pet. Coal 2012, 54, 340–347.
J. Herzberger, K. Niederer, H. Pohlit, J. Seiwert, M. Worm, F. R.
Wurm, H. Frey, Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 2170–2243.
P. Müller, R. D. E. Krösschell, W. Winkenwerder, J. van der Schaaf,
Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 122939.
J. W. Holubka, R. D. Bach, J. L. Andres, Macromolecules 1992, 25,
1189–1192.
H.-W. Engels, H.-G. Pirkl, R. Albers, R. W. Albach, J. Krause, A.
Hoffmann, H. Casselmann, J. Dormish, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013,
52, 9422–9441.
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
L. Lefebvre, J. Kelber, L. Jierry, V. Ritleng, D. Edouard, J. Environ.
Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 79–85.
A. K. Mishra, D. K. Chattopadhyay, B. Sreedhar, K. V. S. N. Raju,
Prog. Org. Coat. 2006, 55, 231–243.
P. A. Charpentier, K. Burgess, L. Wang, R. R. Chowdhury, A. F.
Lotus, G. Moula, Nanotechnology 2012, 23, 425606.
S. Gunashekar, N. Abu-Zahra, Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2014, 2014, DOI
10.1155/2014/570309.
“Polymer Additives and Plasticizers Spectral Library,” can be found
2018.
M. B. Sheratte, Process for Converting the Decomposition Products of
Polyurethane and Novel Compositions Thereby Obtained, 1978,
US4110266A.
D. K. Chattopadhyay, D. C. Webster, Prog. Polym. Sci. 2009, 34,
1068–1133.
In conclusion, we have shown unprecedented catalytic activity of
commercially available polyurethane foam on the propoxylation of
octylamine; i.e., an industrially relevant reaction that could not be
catalyzed selectively before. The catalytic activity of PU foam is
attributed to the hydroxyl and amine groups present in the blown
foam cells. The currently available polyurethane foams are not
stable enough to operate at elevated temperatures (i.e., 130 °C
and above) but show great potential to intensify the reaction
without loss of selectivity up to 110 °C. While common methods
to avoid or reduce catalyst degradation/deactivation involve
modification of the process conditions,[21] in this case, further
material development would likely be a more efficient solution.
The design of a heterogeneous catalyst with the same hydroxyl
and amino functionalities of the PU, but with increased thermo-
chemical- stability at elevated temperatures, could potentially lead
to a paradigm shift in the propoxylated amine production.
[19]
[20]
[21]
W. Wang, L. Cui, P. Sun, L. Shi, C. Yue, F. Li, Chem. Rev. 2018, 118,
9843–9929.
Experimental Section
The experiments were performed in a tubular reactor connected to a flow
set-up. The foam was cut into cylinders and placed in the reactor
separated by glass beads to avoid a large pressure drop. Both propylene
oxide and octylamine were stoichiometrically mixed and pumped through
the reactor, which was immersed in an oil bath. The backpressure of 10
bar guaranteed a one liquid phase mixture. The set-up was connected to
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.