3
148
K. Inamoto et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 53 (2012) 3147–3148
reaction solution for the conversion of allyl ether 1 to phenoxide
. The fluorescence method was performed three times (duplicate
(
a)
2
NC
I
or triplicate each time), all of which resulted in similar conclusions.
Because sample A was diluted 50-fold to perform this deallylation
reaction, the average palladium concentration in sample A (2.5 mL)
was determined to be 0.81 ppb (7.6 nM). Therefore, in the original
reaction mixture (2.6 mL) Scheme 1a), palladium was present at
K PO
3
4
+
NC
(
MeO) CO
2
(
HO) B
135 °C, 24 h
2
No addition of
0
.78 ppb (7.3 nM). The reaction mixture (Scheme 1a) used in this
transition metals
study was different from that in our previous study; therefore,
we consider this palladium level to be within a reasonable range
compared to the previous ICP-MS analysis for the same transfor-
(
b)
5
f
OH
Cl
mation. Because the conversion of allyl ether 1 to phenoxide 2
TFP = tri(2-furyl)phosphine
8d
can be catalyzed by rhodium, although to a lesser extent, we
are not able to exclude the presence of rhodium in sample A. How-
ever, since the Suzuki–Miyaura coupling reactions are typically
catalyzed by palladium, we believe that the presence of palladium
Cl
O
O
O
Pd2+, TFP
NaBH4
OH
Cl
5f
is more relevant to the previously reported reactions. If the trace
Cl
palladium is indeed the catalyst, then the turnover number would
be over ten million under the previously reported reaction condi-
tions in which the limiting agent (4-iodobenzonitrile) was at a
DMSO
pH 7 buffer
45 °C
O
O
O
5
f
1
00 mM concentration.
In summary, we demonstrated the utility of the fluorescence
O
2
Cl
Cl
fluorescent
method to analyze a reaction mixture to detect palladium although
no palladium reagents were added to the mixture. Trace palladium
O
O
OH
4
c
impurities have caused confusion in the literature. This case
study exemplifies potential applications of this user friendly10 fluo-
rescence method in other synthetic laboratories to detect palla-
dium on site.
1
nonfluorescent
Scheme 1. (a) Cross-coupling reaction without adding transition metals. The
reaction mixture was dried under a vacuum, and the resulting crude mixture was
3
treated with 10% HNO before palladium analysis. (b) Palladium(0) generated
Acknowledgments
in situ catalyzes the conversion of the nonfluorescent allyl ether 1 to the green
fluorescent phenoxide 2. The fluorescence signals were measured using a Modulus
II Microplate Multimode Reader (excitation: 490 nm, emission: 510–570 nm).
We thank Mr. Michael P. Cook (University of Pittsburgh) for
suggesting this work. This work was supported by the US National
Science Foundation (CHE-0911092) and a Grant-in-Aid for Young
Scientists (B) (No. 23790002) from Japan Society for the Promotion
of Science.
References and notes
1
.
.
(a) Magano, J.; Dunetz, J. R. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 2177–2250; (b) Nicolaou, K.
C.; Bulger, P. G.; Sarlah, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4442–4489.
(a) Li, B.; Buzon, R. A.; Zhang, Z. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2007, 11, 951–955; (b)
Bullock, K. M.; Mitchell, M. B.; Toczko, J. F. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2008, 12, 896–
2
899; (c) Huang, J. P.; Chen, X. X.; Gu, S. X.; Zhao, L.; Chen, W. X.; Chen, F. E. Org.
Process Res. Dev. 2010, 14, 939–941; (d) Jiang, X. L.; Lee, G. T.; Villhauer, E. B.;
Prasad, K.; Prashad, M. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2010, 14, 883–889; (e) Reginato,
G.; Sadler, P.; Wilkes, R. D. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2011, 15, 1396–1405; (f) Wang,
L.; Green, L.; Li, Z.; McCabe Dunn, J.; Bu, X.; Welch, C. J.; Li, C.; Wang, T.; Tu, Q.;
Bekos, E.; Richardson, D.; Eckert, J.; Cui, J. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2011, 15, 1371–
1
376.
Arvela, R. K.; Leadbeater, N. E.; Mack, T. L.; Kormos, C. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006,
7, 217–220.
(a) Vakuliuk, O.; Koszarna, B.; Gryko, D. T. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011, 353, 925–930;
b) Scrivanti, A.; Beghetto, V.; Bertoldini, M.; Matteoli, U. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2012,
64–268; (c) Thome, I.; Nijs, A.; Bolm, C. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 979–987.
(a) Arvela, R. K.; Leadbeater, N. E.; Sangi, M. S.; Williams, V. A.; Granados, P.;
Singer, R. D. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 161–168; (b) Bedford, R. B.; Nakamura, M.;
Gower, N. J.; Haddow, M. F.; Hall, M. A.; Huwe, M.; Hashimoto, T.; Okopie, R. A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 6110–6111; (c) Gonda, Z.; Tolnai, G.; Novák, Z. Chem.
Eur. J. 2010, 16, 11822–11826; (d) Lauterbach, T.; Livendahl, M.; Rosellón, A.;
Espinet, P.; Echavarren, A. M. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 3006–3009; (e) Wang, R. P.;
Mo, S.; Lu, Y. Z.; Shen, Z. M. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011, 353, 713–718; (f) Inamoto,
K.; Hasegawa, C.; Hiroya, K.; Kondo, Y.; Osako, T.; Uozumi, Y.; Doi, T. Chem.
Commun. 2012, 48, 2912–2914.
3
.
.
Figure 1. Standard curve based on the method in Scheme 1b.
4
4
(
2
The above pre-mixed stock solution was immediately trans-
ferred to eppendorf tubes at 25 °C (1.47 mL in each container). This
experiment was performed in duplicate, and the standard curve
was generated in triplicate. Each of these solutions was treated
5
.
with a palladium solution (0, 5, 10, or 20 ppb in 5% HNO
3
; 30 lL;
5
0-fold dilution) or sample A (30 L; 50-fold dilution) at 25 °C.
l
All of these eppendorf tubes were sealed and heated at 45 °C in
an incubator for 1 h. After cooling the reaction mixtures, the solu-
tions (200
l
L from each reaction) were transferred to a black 96-
6. Leadbeater, N. E. Nat. Chem. 2010, 2, 1007–1009.
7
8
.
.
Miyaura, N.; Suzuki, A. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 2457–2483.
(a) Song, F. L.; Garner, A. L.; Koide, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 12354–12355;
well plate for fluorescence measurement.
As Figure 1 shows, the standard curve for palladium was
y = 224,200[Pd] + 12,560 (y = fluorescence intensity in arbitrary
unit, [Pd] = palladium concentration in ppb) with the r = 0.9855.
The fluorescence intensities with sample A were 15702 and
(
b) Garner, A. L.; Koide, K. Chem. Commun. 2009, 86–88; (c) Garner, A. L.; Song,
F. L.; Koide, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 5163–5171; (d) Song, F.; Carder, E. J.;
Kohler, C. C.; Koide, K. Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 13500–13508.
2
9.
1
6665 (average = 16184). The average palladium concentration,
10. For example, first-year undergraduate students without research experience
were able to use this method after 2–3 h of training in our laboratory.
according to the equation, was determined to be 16.2 ppt in the