Chemistry Letters Vol.33, No.5 (2004)
581
2
Table 1. Kinetic parameters (k1, kꢂ1, Kd, and response) for immobi-
lized mannose
C12-N3 was below the detection limit (0.14 pg/mm ).
Method 2: Azido group of Man-C12-N3 was reduced to ami-
no group in the presence of triphenylphosphine in DMF/H20 for
k1
k
ꢂ1
ꢂ1
Kd
/mM
Responsea
/arc sec
ꢁ
ꢂ1 ꢂ1
6
h at 50 C. The production of 12-aminododecyl ꢁ-D-manno-
pyranoside (Man-C12-NH2) was confirmed by molecular mass
[M + H ] = 364.20) and ninhydrin test. Man-C12-NH2 was
immobilized on carboxylate cuvette in 5 mM maleic acid buffer
pH 6) containing 400-mM EDC and 100-mM NHS. Unreacted
carboxyl groups were blocked with ethanolamine. When the
concentrations of Man-C12-NH2 in the reaction solution were
5, 7.5, and 10 mM, the immobilized amounts were 0.14, 1.09,
and 2.35 pmol/mm , respectively.
/M
s
/s
Method 1
þ
(
ConA
BSA
2516
459
0.021 8.3
0.037 80.6
28
4
(
Method 2
Man = 0.14b
ConA
BSA
ConA
BSA
885
514
2825
531
3564
1567
0.043 48.6
0.020 38.9
38
19
17
1
10
2
b
Man = 1.09
0.025
0.034 64.0
0.023 6.5
0.024 15.3
8.8
2
Man = 2.35b ConA
BSA
a
Response after washing with buffer. [ConA] = 10 mM.
The density of the immobilized mannose (pmol/mm ).
b
2
sponds to 13% displacement of carboxyl group on the sensor
chip with mannose.
In conclusion, we developed two technologies to immobi-
lize azido glycoside on sensor chip. These technologies will lead
to the preparation of saccharide microarray using a strategy that
involves immobilization of the saccharide library obtained by
the saccharide primer method. Method 1 was very favorable
for us to immobilize azide-bearing saccharide library. We are
preparing mictotiter plates displaying azide-bearing oligosac-
charide produced by animal cells.
Figure 2. Binding of ConA (M1) and BSA (M2) to mannose immo-
bilized by method 1. L1 represents the binding of ConA to linker with-
out mannose. [ConA] = [BSA] = 10 mM.
This work was partly supported by Special Coordination of
Funds for Promoting Science and Technology from the Ministry
of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, the
Japanese Government (T. S.)
Whether or not mannose was successfully fixed and dis-
played on the sensor chip by Methods 1 and 2 was confirmed
by analysis with an IAsys. Figure 2 showed the typical sensor-
grams for the binding of mannose–specific lectin, Concanavalin
A (ConA), to mannose displayed by Method 1. Though the
amount of mannose immobilized on a sensor chip was below de-
tection limit of instrument, a specific binding of ConA (curve
M1 in Figure 2) was observed. The binding of ConA was inhib-
ited by the addition of 100 mM mannose, and no significant
binding of ConA to the linker surface without mannose was ob-
served. The bindings of ConA were measured at the ConA con-
centrations of 1, 3, 5, and 10 mM, and the kinetic parameters
References and Notes
1
a) Y. Miura, T. Arai, and T. Yamagata, Carbohydr. Res., 289, 193 (1996).
b) H. Nakajima, Y. Miura, and T. Yamagata, J. Biochem., 124, 148 (1998).
M. C. Z. Kasuya, L. X. Wang, Y. C. Lee, M. Mitsuki, H. Nakajima, Y.
Miura, T. Sato, K. Hatanaka, S. Yamagata, and T. Yamagata, Carbohydr.
Res., 329, 55 (2000).
2
3
S. Fukui, T. Feizi, C. Galustian, A. M. Lawson, and W. Chai, Nat. Biotech-
nol., 20, 1011 (2002).
4
5
6
B. T. Houseman and M. Mrksich, Chem. Biol., 9, 443 (2002).
S. Park and I. Shin, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 41, 3180 (2002).
F. Faizo, M. C. Bryan, O. Blixt, J. C. Paulson, and C.-H. Wong, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 124, 14397 (2002).
(
binding rate k1, dissociation rate kꢂ1, dissociation constant
1
7
H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3); ꢂ 3.75 (2H, t, HOCH2–), 3.23 (2H, m,
Kd, and response) were determined by FASTfit attached to IA-
sys. Those results were summarized in Table 1. The Kd value
for ConA-binding was 8.3 mM, and 10 times lower than that
for BSA-binding. The mannose-immobilized sensor chip pre-
pared by Method 2 also showed specific binding of ConA. The
specificity of ConA-binding depends on the density of immobi-
N3CH2–), 1.58 (5H, m, HOCH2CH2–, N3CH2CH2–, –OH), 1.38–1.28
(16H, m, –CH2–). C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) ꢂ 62.73 (s, 1C, –CH2OH),
13
5
1.31 (s, 1C, –CH2N3).
þ
8
MS (MALDI-TOF): m=z ¼ 581:30 [M + Na ]. 1H NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3) ꢂ 1.27 (16H, s, –CH2–), 1.57 (4H, m, –CH2–), 1.75 (3H, s,
–CH ), 2.05 (3H, s, –CH ), 2.08 (3H, s, –CH ), 2.12 (3H, s, –CH ),
3
3
3
3
3.26 (2H, t, –CH2N3), 3.47 (2H, m, O–CH2–), 3.68 (1H, m, H5), 4.14
0
2
(1H, dd, H6), 4.24 (1H, dd, H6 ), 4.59 (1H, dd, H2), 5.15 (1H, dd, H3),
lized mannose. For the mannose density of 0.14 pmol/mm , no
5
.30 (1H, t, H4), 5.47 (1H, d, J ¼ 2:44 Hz, H1).
significant differences in the Kd values between ConA and
BSA were observed, though response due to the binding amount
of ConA was higher than that of BSA. For the mannose density
9
N. Athanassopoulou, R. J. Davies, P. R. Edwards, D. Yeung, and C. H.
Maule, Biochem. Soc. Trans., 27, 340 (1998).
10 a) E. Saxon, J. I. Armstrong, and C. R. Bertozzi, Org. Lett., 2, 2141 (2000).
b) E. Saxon, S. J. Luchansky, H. C. Hang, C. Yu, S. C. Lee, and C. R.
Bertozzi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 124, 14893 (2002).
2
of 1.09 pmol/mm , significant differences in Kd values between
ConA and BSA were observed. These values well agreed with
þ
1
11
MS(FAB): m=z ¼ 306 [M + H ]. H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3); ꢂ 3.67
those obtained by Method 1. For the mannose density of
2
(1H, s, –CH ), 7.83 (1H, d, J ¼ 8:05 Hz, Ar–H), 8.11 (1H, d,
3
J ¼ 8:63 Hz, Ar–H), 8.68 (1H, s, Ar–H).
2.35 pmol/mm , the specific binding of ConA was observed,
though the differences in Kd value between ConA and BSA
þ
1
1
2
MS (MALDI-TOF): m=z ¼ 365:31 [M + H ]. H NMR (300 MHz,
DMSO-d6) ꢂ 3.41 (3H, s, –CH3), 7.20 (4H, m, Ar–H), 7.40 (6H, m, Ar–
was not so large. From these results, it is considered that the op-
2
31
H), 7.52 (1H, d, J ¼ 3:78 Hz, Ar–H), 8.02 (2H, m, Ar–H). P NMR
timum density of mannose is about 1 pmol/mm , which corre-
(300 MHz, DMSO-d6) ꢂ ꢂ5:72 (P:), 28.13 (P=O).
Published on the web (Advance View) April 19, 2004; DOI 10.1246/cl.2004.580