W.R. Lovett et al.
Dyes and Pigments 190 (2021) 109268
when the solution turned a pale yellow. This reaction mixture was
slowly allowed to reach room temperature while 4-methylpyridine was
added dropwise over 30 min. The solution was then heated under reflux
for 4 h to ensure the full conversion of all the 4-methylpyridine before
being cooled back to room temperature. The crude slurry was then
poured over ice water to precipitate the final product 1. This compound
was filtered and washed with ice water then dried under reduced pres-
sure. This linker 1 was used without further purification for dye
condensation according to the previous procedure [38].
Hz, 2H), 7.77 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.99 (m, 6H), 8.927 (d, J = 6.0 Hz,
2H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO‑d6): δ 21.53, 32.34, 46.54, 98.60,
114.43, 123.74, 126.09, 126.14, 126.55, 127.65, 128.56, 128.72,
128.85, 140.96, 141.14, 141.73, 143.90, 148.90, 166.51, 172.5. HRMS
(MS ES+) calcd for C42H38N3S2: m/z 648.2502 [M]+. Found: m/z
648.2501 [M]+.
Molar absorptivity was recorded for each synthesized dye using a
Varian Spectrophotometer (Varian Inc. Palo Alto, CA.). This instrument
was paired to Cary WinUV Scan Application v3.00 on a PC to visualize
and export data. Each sample was recorded at increasing molar con-
centrations (μM) in ethanol using standard polystyrene cuvettes with a
3.3. General synthesis of dye derivatives 9-12
path length of 1 cm. Each sample was prepared from a stock solution of
the dye. Preparation was done in dimethyl sulfoxide and measured on an
analytical balance to approximate a 1.0 mM solution of the dye. The
stock solutions were chosen to be prepared from DMSO due to its high
solubility for both polar and polyaromatic substances and for DMSO’s
ability to dissolve into ethanol effectively. Before recording their
spectra, each sample was sonicated for 30 min, then vortexed for 1 min
to ensure complete dissolution. Fluorescence emission for each synthe-
A mixture of individual benzothiazolium salt 5–8 (4 mmol), and
linker 1 (2 mmol) was added to a 50 mL solution of butanol in a two-
neck round-bottom flask equipped with a magnetic stir bar, a
condenser running vertically, and a rubber septum in the other neck. To
this reaction mixture, triethylamine (4.5 mmol) was added dropwise as
◦
the solution was brought to 110 C over an oil bath. As the reaction
progressed, a dark blue color was formed in situ. A drop of the reaction
mixture was analyzed via TLC for the consumption of linker 1, and
UV–Vis spectroscopy was used to monitor the conversion of a half dye
peak (~450–550 nm) to the pentamethine dye peak (~650 nm). Upon
reaction mixture completion, the round bottom flask was removed from
the heat and transferred to a rotary evaporation unit to remove butanol
under vacuum while it was still hot. The resulting crude residue was
then dissolved in a minimal amount of methanol (1–3 mL) then
precipitated from ethyl acetate or diethyl ether. This recrystallization
protocol was performed thrice before the resulting blue solid was puri-
fied over silica chromatography with a gradient solution of 2% methanol
and dichloromethane before 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and HRMS analysis
(Figs. S9–S20).
sized dye was recorded with
a Shimadzu RF-5301 Spectro-
fluorophotometer (Shimadzu Corporation Analytical Instruments
Division, Duisburg, F.R. Germany). This data was analyzed through a PC
operating the RF-5301 acquisition software to visualize and record data.
The experimental parameters for each fluorophore emission spectral
acquisition were as follows: slit width of excitation set to 5 nm, slit width
of emission set to 5 nm, sensitivity set to high, gain set to medium,
wavelength speed set to medium, a light source consistent with a 150 W
Xenon lamp bulb, and an excitation wavelength set to 10 nm blueshift
from the absorbance of each respective dye sample. Four-faced poly-
styrene fluorescence cuvettes with pathlengths of 1 cm were used for
each sample. Each sample was taken from getting its absorbance profile
recorded then diluted 20x to ensure an absorption value of 0.1 A U. to
minimize any inner filter effects from the concentration being too high.
The cuvettes were then sonicated for 30 min and vortexed for an addi-
tional minute to ensure full dissolution and dispersion. The data was
analyzed, visualized, and all corresponding calculations were performed
using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA.)
2-((1E,3Z,5Z)-5-(3,5-dimethylbenzo[d]thiazol-2(3H)-ylidene)-
3-(pyridin-4-yl)penta-1,3-dien-1-yl)-3,5-dimethylbenzo[d]thiazol-
3-ium iodide (9). (0.35 g, 92%). M.p. 249–251 ◦C. Vis/NIR abs, λmax
:
648 nm. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO‑d6): δ 2.44 (s, 6H), 3.72 (s, 6H), 6.19
(d, J = 12.0 Hz, 2H), 7.29 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.59 (s, 2H), 7.93 (m, 6H),
8.86 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO‑d6): δ 21.57, 34.28,
98.69, 114.58, 114.72,112.74, 123.10, 127.22, 127.55, 138.94, 142.54,
142.73, 144.11, 148.25, 166.90. HRMS (MS ES+) calcd for C28H26N3S2+:
m/z 468.1563 [M]+. Found: m/z 468.1565 [M]+.
3.4. pH responsiveness data
All meso-pyridyl fluorophores were tested for their absorbance and
emission response to pH. Each sample was prepared in a polystyrene
fluorescence cuvette with a path length of 1 cm. These were then set to a
specific pH using a stock solution of 1 M HCl in ethanol or 1 M Na2CO3,
pure ethanol, and the requisite volume of stock solution of each dye to
5-fluoro-2-((1E,3Z,5Z)-5-(5-fluoro-3-methylbenzo[d]thiazol-2
(3H)-ylidene)-3-(pyridin-4-yl)penta-1,3-dien-1-yl)-3-methylbenzo
◦
[d]thiazol-3-ium iodide (10). (0.28 g, 89%). M.p. 225–229 C. Vis/
NIR abs, λmax: 652 nm. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO‑d6): δ 3.71 (s, 6H),
6.14 (d, J = 14.0 Hz, 2H), 7.35 (t, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.76 (d, J = 9.2 Hz,
2H), 7.86 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 2H), 8.09 (m, 4H), 8.91 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 2H). 13C
NMR (100 MHz, DMSO‑d6): δ 34.40, 98.96, 101.98, 121.37, 124.99,
126.42, 143.71, 143.83, 148.74,161.98, 163.56, 163.72, 167.68. HRMS
(MS ES+) calcd for C26H20F2N3S2+: m/z 476.1061 [M]+. Found: m/z
476.1063 [M]+.
reach a total of 2.500 mL and 20 μM concentration of the dye. Each
sample was sonicated for 30 min then vortexed for 1 min before the
acquisition. The pH-resolved absorbance profiles were recorded in a
Varian Spectrophotometer linked to Cary WinUV Scan Application
v3.00 on a PC to visualize and export data. The pH-resolved emission
profiles for each dye were recorded in a Shimadzu RF-5301 Spectro-
fluorophotometer. This data was measured through a PC operating the
RF-5301 acquisition software to visualize and record the data. The
exported data was visualized and used to calculated response parame-
ters using Microsoft Excel.
3-ethyl-2-((1E,3Z,5Z)-5-(3-ethylbenzo[d]thiazol-2(3H)-yli-
dene)-3-(pyridin-4-yl)penta-1,3-dien-1-yl)benzo[d]thiazol-3-ium
iodide (11). (0.33 g, 93%). M.p. 223–226 ◦C. Vis/NIR abs, λmax: 647 nm.
1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO‑d6): δ 1.21 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 6H), 4.29 (d, J =
7.2 Hz, 4H), 6.09 (d, J = 12.8 Hz, 2H), 7.45 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.59 (t, J
= 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.71 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 2H), 7.77 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 8.00 (m,
4H), 8.82 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO‑d6): δ 13.35,
42.26, 98.48, 114.32, 114.54, 123.61, 123.86, 126.26, 127.27, 127.43,
128.98, 141.51, 145.54, 149.29, 166.10. HRMS (MS ES+) calcd for
3.5. Computational methods
HOMO and LUMO orbital geometries were calculated using a
restricted hybrid Hartree Fock/Density Functional Theory (HF-DFT)
self-consistent fields (SCF) algorithm. These calculations were per-
formed using a Geometric Direct Minimization and a 6-31G* basis set
and B3LYP methodology via Spartan18. Additionally, QSAR parameters
such as polar surface area (PSA) and LogP were also calculated using the
same software. The data acquired from this software was then further
analyzed using Microsoft Excel.
C
28H26N3S+2 : m/z 468.1563 [M]+. Found: m/z 468.1568 [M]+.
3-(3-phenylpropyl)-2-((1E,3Z,5Z)-5-(3-(3-phenylpropyl)benzo
[d]thiazol-2(3H)-ylidene)-3-(pyridin-4-yl)penta-1,3-dien-1-yl)
benzo[d]thiazol-3-ium bromide (12). (0.31 g, 90%). M.p.
216–218 ◦C. Vis/NIR abs, λmax: 651 nm. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO‑d6):
δ 1.96 (m, 4H), 2.65 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 4H), 4.32 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 4H), 6.10 (d,
J = 14 Hz, 2H), 7.19 (m, 10H), 7.47 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.59 (t, J = 7.8
4