Chemistry Letters 2002
Table 1. Optical properties of 2a-2d and 3a-3d
233
(1994).
V. Alain, S. Redoglia, and M. B. Desce, Chem. Phys., 245, 51
(1999).
X. Wu, J. Wu, Y. Liu, and A. K.-Y. Jen, Chem. Commun.,
1999, 2391
max/nm ꢀa (10À30 esu)
5
6
7
8
ꢄ
c
Chromophores
ꢀ0 (10À30 esu)
in methanol at ꢄ ¼ 1064 nm
2a
3a
2b
3b
2c
3c
2d
344
431
331
423
319
410
439
471
474
438e
370
161
329
112
147
64
165
199
279
84
95
62
46
37
57
53
55
55d
42d
16
J. Zyss, ‘‘Molecular Nonlinear Optics,’’ Academic Press,
New York (1994), pp 149–150.
The yield, melting point, IR (KBr, cmÀ1Þ, NMR (300 MHz),
MS, and elemental analysis data for these compounds are as
follows: 2a: yield 86%;mp 171–172 ꢁC ;IR 1666 (-C ¼N),
3352 (N-H); 1H-NMR (CDCl3) ꢅ2.99(s, 6H), 6.69(d, J ¼ 9:0,
2H), 7.03(s, 1H), 7.51(d, J ¼ 9:0, 2H), 7.74(s, 1H);
MS(FAB), m=z: 329, 100%. Anal. Calcd for C15H12N3F5:
C, 54.71;H, 3.64;N, 12.76%. Found: C, 55.02;H, 4.15;N,
12.85%. 2b: yield 89%;mp135–136 ꢁC;IR 1662(C ¼N),
3317(N-H); 1H-NMR (CDCl3Þ ꢅ 0.84(t, 3H), 1.32(m, 6H),
1.86(m, 2H), 4.24(t, 2H), 7.28–7.36(m, 4H), 7.72–7.84(m,
2H), 7.88(s, 1H), 8.08(s, 1H), 8.24(s, 1H);MS(FAB), m=z:
459, 100%. Anal. Calcd for C25H22N3F5: C, 65.36;H, 4.79;N,
9.15%. Found: C, 65.15;H, 4.95;N, 8.75%. 2c: yield 73%;
mp 120–121 ꢁC;IR 1664(-C ¼N), 3358 (N-H); 1H-NMR
(CDCl3) ꢅ 3.84(t, 3H), 6.91(d, J ¼ 9:0, 2H), 7.15(s, 1H),
7.56(d, J ¼ 9:0, 2H), 7.78(s, 1H);MS(FAB), m=z: 316, 100%.
Anal. Calcd for C14H9F5N2O: C, 53.16;H, 2.84;N, 8.86%.
Found: C, 53.45;H, 3.15;N, 8.85%. 2d: yield 79%;mp 193–
194 ꢁC;IR 1664(-C ¼N), 3242(N-H); 1H-NMR(DMSO) ꢅ
1.12(t, 3H), 3.34(m, 6H), 6.76(d, 2H), 7.60–7.76(m, 6H),
8.10(s, 1H), 10.4(s,1H);MS(FAB), m=z: 477, 100%. Anal.
Calcd for C23H20F5N5O: C, 57.86;H, 4.19;N, 14.67%.
Found: C, 57.45;H, 4.55;N, 14.85%. 3b: yield 81%;mp 151–
152 ꢁC;IR 1359, 1540(-NO 2Þ, 3253(N-H); 1H-NMR (CDCl3)
ꢅ 0.85(t, 3H), 1.31(m, 6H), 1.88(m, 2H), 4.34(t, 2H), 6.99(d,
1H), 7.18–7.53(m, 4H), 7.92–8.03(m, 2H), 8.09–8.21(m, 4H),
8.62(s, 1H), 10.09(s, 1H);MS(FAB), m=z: 414, 100%. Anal.
Calcd for C25H26N4O2: C, 72.46;H, 6.28;N, 13.52%. Found:
3d
DANAB
DANS
p-NA
97b
73b
34
aꢀ values measured by HRS technique in methanol using the
fundamental excitation wavelength of 1064 nm. bꢀ measured
by EFISH in chloroform using the fundamental excitation
wavelength of 1300 nm.10 c,dDispersion-corrected ꢀ values
calculated by using an approximate two-level model (d see
Reference 10). eMeasured in chloroform.
seem then to offer interesting nonlinearity-transparency compro-
mise as compared to the corresponding stilbene and azobenzene
derivatives. In addition, 2a-2c exhibited also 26–51 nm blue-
shifted absorption in comparison with p-NA, and their ꢀ values
are 2–5 times higher than that of p-NA. All the above results
suggest that arylhydrazone chromophores with pentafluorophen-
yl moieties exhibit better optimization of the nonlinearity-
transparency trade-off.
In summary, we have synthesized a series of new
arylhydrazone chromophores containing pentafluorophenyl as
electron acceptor. They all show remarkablely blue-shifted
absorption in comparison with the corresponding 4-nitrophenyl
analogues and provide a new approach for turning the
nonlinearity-transparency trade-off.
ꢁ
C, 72.25;H, 6.31;N, 13.35%. 3d: yield 76%;mp 197–198 C;
IR 1340, 1522 (-NO2Þ, 3238 (N-H); 1H-NMR (DMSO) ꢅ
1.12(t, 3H), 3.12(m, 4H), 3.52(t, 2H), 6.76(d, J ¼ 10, 2H),
7.16(d, J ¼ 10, 2H), 7.68–7.76(m, 6H), 8.04–8.12(d, 2H),
8.16(s, 1H), 11.32(s, 1H);MS(FAB), m=z: 432, 100%. Anal.
Calcd for C23H24N6O3: C, 63.89;H, 5.56;N, 19.44%. Found:
C, 63.45;H, 5.75;N, 19.25%.
The work was supported by a grant from the National Key
Fundamental Research Program of China and by National
Science Foundation of China.
References and Notes
1
2
3
4
A. K.-Y. Jen, V. Pushkarn Rao, K. Y. Wang, and K. J. Drost, J.
Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1993, 90.
A. K-Y. Jen, Y. Cai, P. V. Bedworth, and S. R. Marder, Adv.
Mater., 9, 132 (1997).
F. Wang, A. W. Harper, M. S. Lee, and L. R. Dalton, Chem.
Mater., 9, 228 (1999).
R. K. David, A. R. Mark, and J. M. Tobin, Chem. Rev., 94, 195
9
Y. Shen, Z. Tang, M. Gui, J. Cheng, and Z. Lu, Chem. Lett.,
2000, 1140.
10 J. L. Ouder and D. S. Chemla, J. Chem. Phys., 66, 2264
(1977).
11 C. R. Moulan, R. J. Twieg, V. Y. Less, and R. D. Miller, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 115, 12599 (1993).