A R T I C L E S
Sonnenberg et al.
on a solid surface and afterward successively desorbed by separating
tip and surface. When the tip is approaching the bare surface, polymers
will adsorb onto it. When retracting the AFM tip, the molecules
successively desorb from the surface. Therefore, desorption takes place
under equilibrium conditions because of the much faster dynamics of
the polymer-surface contacts in comparison to the retraction velocity
of the AFM tip (ca. 1 µm/s). In other words, the polymers are highly
mobile on the surface and are able to rearrange on the surface rather
than being pinned to the surface.26 As a consequence, the polymer chains
are simply “pulled-off” the surface and the desorption process is not
loading-rate-dependent, i.e., the detected force is not a function of the
retraction velocity of the cantilever. Under these conditions the
desorption process manifests itself as a plateau of constant force in the
force-distance curves. The height of the force plateau represents the
magnitude of the desorption force between the polymer chain and the
surface, and the mean desorption force is obtained by a statistical
analysis. Note that the desorption force can only be determined with
high accuracy from the last plateau (Fdes in Figure 3), as no
intermolecular interactions are contributing here.
Figure 2. Attachment of PEO-b-PLE carrying primary amine functions at
the R-chain end to an epoxy-functionalized AFM tip.
were weighted in separate two-neck flasks and dried overnight at room
temperature in vacuum. The flasks were filled with argon and DMF
2 2 5
(distilled from CaH and from P O ) was added (3 mL and 5 mL,
respectively). The mixtures were stirred at room temperature until
complete dissolution, and then the solution of the NCA was added to
the polymer via a transfer needle. The combined solution was stirred
for 3 days at 60 °C, and then the solution was cooled down to room
temperature and concentrated to 3 mL. The product was afterward
precipitated into diethyl ether and dried under reduced pressure.
In the case of low lateral mobility of the polymers, the observed
force-extension traces are significantly altered; the flat desorption
plateaus pass into stretching curves (from which the elasticity of single
26,27
polymer chains can be deduced) or a combination of both.
However,
if the lateral mobility of the polymers is high as throughout in the
experiments described here, the molecules rearrange on the surface to
maximize the adsorption enthalpy. Flat force plateaus in the force-
extension spectra are then obtained even on rough surfaces (e.g., etched
silicon nitride).2 That is, the surface roughness or surface structures
1
H NMR: 819 BLE repeating units, SEC: PDI ) 1.4 (apparent
polydispersity index) (see Supporting Information, Figures SI-1 and
SI-2).
Poly(4-(2-(amino hydrochloride)-ethylthio)-butylene)-block-poly-
8,29
(e.g., steps on the calcite surface) are not reflected in the measurements
(ethylene oxide)-block-poly(γ-benzyl L-glutamate) (PA-b-PEO-b-
curves under these conditions.
PBLE). In a 25 mL three-necked round-bottom flask, PB-b-PEO-b-
PBLE (0.150 g) and 2-aminoethanethiol hydrochloride (0.023 g) were
dissolved in 5 mL of DMF. Under stirring, the solution was saturated
with nitrogen for 30 min. Azoisobutyronitrile (AIBN, 0.004 g) was
then added, and the solution was stirred for 24 h at 60 °C. The product
was precipitated into diethyl ether, filtered, redissolved in DMF/water
Moreover, the distance at which the plateau force drops to zero
(plateau length) denotes the complete detachment of the polymer from
the surface, and thus the number of observed plateaus equals the number
of desorbed polymer chains.
The AFM desorption measurements were conducted with a home-
built instrument. Nominal spring constants of the cantilevers were
calibrated using the thermal oscillation method. Because of the
calculated spring constants may have deviations of up to 10%, a single
tip was used for an entire set of measurement series to monitor minute
force differences. Thereby, every measurement series consists of 750-
1000 force-distance curves. As a consequence, the binding of the
polymers to the tip had to be very robust because for every tip about
20000 force-distance curves had to be recorded. The usage of a
polyamine-block for attaching the molecules to the tip proved to be
highly efficient and have long-term stability because of the multiple
binding sites.
1
:1 (v/v), and dialyzed against deionized water. After freeze-drying,
the triblock copolymer with pendant amine groups was obtained as a
white powder.
About 30 amino groups should be attached to the R-chain end of
PEO-b-PBLE, considering an efficiency of thiol addition of ∼75% (see
ref 20).
Poly(4-(2-amino-ethylthio)-butylene)-block-poly(ethylene oxide)-
block-poly(L-glutamate) (Polyamine-b-PEO-b-PLE). The polyamine-
b-PEO-b-PBLE (0.100 g) was dissolved in a mixture of DMF (5 mL)
and water (5 mL), and the solution was saturated with nitrogen for 10
min. A 0.1 N NaOH (0.5 mL) solution was added under stirring, and
the solution was stirred overnight at room temperature. The solution
was then dialyzed and freeze-dried to obtain the triblock copolymer
polyamine-b-PEO-b-PLE.
The covalent attachment of the block copolymer PEO273-b-PLE819
to the AFM tip allows for studying the interaction of both the PEO
and the PLE with the calcite surface in a single experiment. Figure 4
shows a force plateau as obtained by continuously desorbing the block
copolymer from the calcite (104) face in an aqueous solution of 10
Modification of AFM Tips. Epoxy-functionalized AFM tips for the
covalent attachment of polyamines were obtained by treating the Si N
3 4
tip (Microlever, Veeco Instruments) with (3-glycidyloxypropyl)tri-
methoxysilane for 30 s and rinsing with toluene and water three times.
Afterward the polymers were immediately attached to the AFM tip by
soaking it in an aqueous solution of polyamine-b-PEO-b-PLE (con-
centration 0.25 mg/mL) for 90 min (Figure 2). After rinsing with water,
the modified tip was dried with nitrogen.
mM CaCl . It may be important to point out that because of the
2
attachment of the polymer to the AFM tip via the amine functions, the
PEO block is first desorbed and then the PLE block (see Figures 2 and
3). This means that at distances larger than the contour length of the
PEO273 (∼100 nm), the measured desorption force exclusively originates
from the desorption of PLE monomers.
AFM Desorption Experiments. In desorption experiments1
7,22-25
The interaction force of the PLE is slightly higher than that of PEO,
as qualitatively expected, because PEO is not supposed to adsorb
single polymer chains covalently attached to the AFM tip are adsorbed
(
(
(
(
22) Hugel, T.; Grosholz, M.; Clausen-Schaumann, H.; Pfau, A.; Gaub, H.; Seitz,
M. Macromolecules 2001, 34, 1039-1047.
(26) K u¨ hner, F.; Erdmann, M.; Sonnenberg, L.; Serr, A.; Morfill, J.; Gaub, H.
E. Langmuir 2006, 22, 11180-11186.
23) Friedsam, C.; Becares, A. D.; Jonas, U.; Seitz, M.; Gaub, H. E. New J.
Phys. 2004, 6, 9.
(27) Hugel, T.; Seitz, M. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2001, 22, 989-1016.
(28) Sonnenberg, L.; Parvole, J.; K u¨ hner, F.; Billon, L.; Gaub, H. E. Langmuir
2007, 23, 6660-6666.
24) Cui, S. X.; Liu, C. J.; Wang, Z. Q.; Zhang, X. Macromolecules 2004, 37,
9
46-953.
25) Chatellier, X.; Senden, T. J.; Joanny, J. F.; di Meglio, J. M. Europhys.
Lett. 1998, 41, 303-308.
(29) Sonnenberg, L.; Parvole, J.; Borisov, O.; Billon, L.; Gaub, H. E.; Seitz,
M. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 281-288.
15366 J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
9
VOL. 129, NO. 49, 2007