ORGANIC
LETTERS
2
003
Vol. 5, No. 17
099-3101
Enantioselective Rh-Catalyzed
Hydrogenation of Vinyl Carboxylates
with Monodentate Phosphite Ligands
3
†
Manfred T. Reetz,* Lukas J. Goossen,* Andreas Meiswinkel, Jens Paetzold, and
Jakob Feldthusen Jensen
Max-Planck-Institut f u¨ r Kohlenforschung, Kaiser-Wilhelm-Platz 1,
D-45470 M u¨ lheim/Ruhr, Germany
reetz@mpi-muelheim.mpg.de; goossen@mpi-muelheim.mpg.de
Received June 13, 2003
ABSTRACT
Alkyl-substituted vinylcarboxylates, which normally show poor enantioselectivity in Rh-catalyzed hydrogenation with traditional chiral
diphosphines, undergo highly enantioselective reactions with BINOL- and carbohydrate-based monophosphite ligands.
The asymmetric Rh-catalyzed hydrogenation of enol esters
with formation of chiral esters constitutes an alternative to
the enantioselective reduction of the corresponding prochiral
ketones. Moreover, enol esters are not only accessible from
ketones, but also from alkynes by metal-catalyzed reaction
with carboxylic acids. A particularly mild and efficient
version of the latter reaction 1 + 2 f 3, using commercially
catalyzed asymmetric olefin hydrogenation using cheap and
readily accessible BINOL-derived monodentate phosphites
(Scheme 1, bottom). Other groups have already reported
3
efficient ligand systems for the hydrogenation of enol
acetates, although high enantioselectivities (ee > 90%) were
restricted to substrates bearing aryl, vinyl, or trifluoromethyl
1
4
groups at the olefinic function. In the case of alkyl residues,
available [(p-cymene)RuCl
2
]
2 3
PR , was recently reported by
enantioselectivity is consistently mediocre (e.g., 64% ee in
one of us (Scheme 1, top).2
the case of the hydrogenation of 3 with R ) n-C
7
H15 and R′
5
)
CH ). In the present study we focus on this problem. To
3
tune the reaction, we envisioned the variation of the nature
of the R′ group in 3 as well as optimization of the modular
chiral monophosphite 6 employed as the ligand in the Rh
Scheme 1
(
1) (a) Rotem, M.; Shvo, Y. Organometallics 1983, 2, 1689-1691. (b)
Mitsudo, T.; Hori, Y.; Watanabe, Y. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 1566-1568.
c) Mitsudo, T.; Hori, Y.; Yamakawa, Y.; Watanabe, Y. J. Org. Chem.
(
1
987, 52, 2230-2239. (d) Doucet, H.; H o¨ fer, J.; Bruneau, C.; Dixneuf, P.
H. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1993, 850-851. (e) Doucet, H.; Martin-
Vaca, B.; Bruneau, C.; Dixneuf, P. H. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 7247-
7
255. (f) Doucet, H.; Derrien, N.; Kabouche, Z.; Bruneau, C.; Dixneuf, P.
H. J. Organomet. Chem. 1997, 551, 151-157. (g) Bruneau, C.; Neveux-
Duflos, M.; Dixneuf, P. H. Green Chem. 1999, 1, 183-185.
(2) Goossen, L. J.; Paetzold, J.; Koley, D. Chem. Commun. (Cambridge,
U.K.) 2003, 706-707.
The goal of the present study was to test compounds of
the type 3 in our previously described method of Rh-
(3) (a) Reetz, M. T.; Mehler, G. Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 4047-4049;
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3889-3890. (b) Reetz, M. T.; Sell, T.;
Meiswinkel, A.; Mehler, G. Angew. Chem. 2003, 115, 814-817; Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 790-793. (c) Chen, W.; Xiao, J. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2001, 42, 2897-2899. (d) Komarov, I. V.; B o¨ rner, A. Angew. Chem.
2001, 113, 1237-1240; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 1197-1200.
†
Dedicated to Professor Dr. Helmut Schwarz on the occasion of his
6
0th birthday.
1
0.1021/ol035076p CCC: $25.00 © 2003 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 07/25/2003