Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
lower than that of tert-butylazocumene (28.6 kcal/mol).31
This result is surprising because azoalkane thermolysis rates
generally reflect the stability of the incipient radicals, and
the C-H bond dissociation energy (BDE) of 1-methylnaph-
thalene and 9-methylanthracene lie 2.9 and 6.6 kcal/mol,
respectively, below that of toluene.32 To gain further insight
into this discrepancy, we carried out B3LYP calculations on
benzylic C-H bond dissociation and the results are sum-
marized in Table 3. While the calculated BDEs of all three
and 0.223 at the R, 1, and 9 positions, respectively, and those
of 3 are 0.599, 0.388, 0.358, and 0.152 at the R, 2, 4, and
10 positions, respectively. No other ring position exhibited a
spin density over 0.11. Ignoring steric hindrance, these values
predict several recombination products for 6 and 3. Such
hindrance does not affect AN itself, where the 9 and 10 posi-
tions are attacked preferentially by radicals.33,34 In addition to
the AN recombination products that we see by HPLC/UV
and GC/MS, there are others that lack the AN chromophore.
These are assumed to be quinoid compounds such as 5 derived
from recombination on the ring without rearomatization. The
complexity of the products from 1 and 2, the difficulty of
separating the various ANs and quinoid ANs, and their
sensitivity to acid rendered a complete analysis impractical.
Four lines of evidence point to induced decomposition of
1 and 2: the curved first-order plot without thiophenol, the
linear plot with thiophenol, the high nitrogen quantum yield
of 2, and the fact that thermolysis of tert-heptyl perpivalate
in the presence of 1 causes disappearance of the azo
compound and yields mostly non-AN products. To our
knowledge, there is no previous case of induced decomposi-
tion of an azoalkane, except for some early gas phase work.35
For example, the linear activation plot for thermolysis of
allylic azoalkanes36 argues against induced decomposition.
A likely reason why we see this complication in 1 and 2 is
that AN is highly prone to radical attack. Thus its methyl
affinity is about 16 times greater than that of a simple 1-olefin
and is over 1300 times larger than that of benzene.37
2-Cyanopropyl and benzyl radicals readily attack AN at the
9-position,33,34 supporting the notion that the 16.69 min GC
peak from the perester and 1 has the structure 5.
In summary, the new azo compounds 1 and 2 are strong
UV absorbers by virtue of their AN chromophore. On
irradiation, singlet electronic energy is mostly transferred
from the AN ring to the azo group; however, despite the
close proximity of these chromophores, energy transfer is
incomplete. Compounds 1 and 2 are effective photoinitiators
that yield tert-butyl radicals plus radicals 3 and 6. Ther-
molysis occurs at moderate temperatures, and the rate
constants can be rationalized by a combination of steric and
radical-stabilization arguments. If the tert-butyl radicals are
not scavenged, they attack the AN ring, leading to the first
case of solution phase induced decomposition of an azo
compound. Initiators 1 and 2 convert styrene and methyl
methacrylate to end-labeled fluorescent polymers.
Table 3. B3LYP Calculations on Cumene,
Isopropylanthracenes, and Their Radicals
energya
25 °C
3° C-H BDEb Erel kcal/mol
kcal/mol (298 °C)
species
(298 °C)c
H•
-0.498856
-350.002478
-349.372017
-657.182854
cumene
82.6
82.9
79.5
0.0
2.5
cumyl•
1-isopropylAN
1-isopropylAN•(3) -656.551876
2-isopropylAN -657.186782
2-isopropylAN•(6) -656.561305
(0.0)d
a In hartrees. b Bond dissociation energy. c Strain energy assuming that
cumene is unstrained. d Assumed same as cumene.
compounds are indeed similar, we can detect conformational
energy differences that form a consistent picture, despite
lying barely outside the error limits of the calculations.
Both cumyl radical and 6 are planar; hence, the 3.1 kcal/
mol lower BDE of 2-isopropylanthracene suggests greater
resonance stabilization of 6 than cumyl. On the other hand,
repulsion between methyl and the 9-hydrogen, which twists
the side chain of 3 out of plane by 15°, raises its energy 5.9
kcal/mol above that of 6. Similar steric repulsion in 1-iso-
propylanthracene elevates its energy 2.5 kcal/mol above that
of the 2-isomer, with the net result that the C-H BDE of
1-isopropylanthracene is 3.4 kcal/mol greater than that of
2-isopropylanthracene. In dissociation of 1 and 2, the radicals
must again differ by 5.9 kcal/mol, but the 1.1 kcal/mol lower
∆G‡ (100 °C) of 2 compared to that of 1 means that the
ground-state energy of 1 lies 4.8 kcal/mol above that of 2,
if entropy effects are ignored. Quite reasonably, the steric
repulsion that elevates 1-isopropylanthracene above its
2-isomer becomes more severe in 1 versus 2. Thus ground-
state steric repulsion narrows the ∆G‡ (100 °C) gap (1.1 kcal/
mol) between 1 and 2 more than expected on the basis of
the C-H BDE difference between 1-isopropylanthracene and
2-isopropylanthracene (3.4 kcal/mol).
Acknowledgment. We thank the National Science Foun-
dation and the Robert A. Welch Foundation for financial
support of this work.
Although the structure of only three products (isopropyl,
2-propenyl, and tert-heptyl anthacenes) was determined with
certainty, it is clear from GC/MS and HPLC/UV that there
are at least two radical recombination products from 6 and
three from 3. A clue about their possible structures can be
obtained from the spin density of radicals 6 and 3. The values
calculated by density functional theory for 6 are 0.643, 0.436,
Supporting Information Available: Experimental pro-
cedures and spectral data for all new compounds. This
material is available free of charge via the Internet at
OL016430R
(33) Bickel, A. F.; Kooyman, E. D. Rec. TraV. Chim. 1952, 71, 1137.
(34) Beckwith, A. L. J.; Waters, W. A. J. Chem. Soc. 1957, 1001.
(35) Riblett, E. W.; Rubin, L. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1937, 59, 1537.
(36) Engel, P. S.; Bishop, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 6754.
(37) Zytowski, T.; Fischer, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 12869.
(31) Engel, P. S.; Pan, L.; Ying, Y.-M.; Alemany, L. B. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2001, 123, 3706.
(32) Stein, S. E.; Brown, R. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 787.
3148
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 20, 2001