and competition of both with dealkylation on the sites strong-
er than 125 kJ mol~1, the concentrations of active sites able to
catalyse both isomerisation and disproportionation are 566
and 354 lmol g~1 for HYd and NaHY, respectively. Accord-
ingly, the occurrence of disproportionation over HYd is most
likely related to its higher density of active sites in comparison
with NaHY, where bimolecular disproportionation is dis-
favoured.
simply raising the temperature at 773 K in N Ñow until
neither reactants nor products were revealed in the exit
stream.
References
2
1
2
3
4
C. Dimitrov, Z. Popova and M. Tuyen, React. Kinet. Catal. L ett.,
1978, 1, 101.
V. Solinas, R. Monaci, B. Marongiu and L. Forni, Appl. Catal.,
1983, 5, 171.
V. Solinas, R. Monaci, B. Marongiu and L. Forni, Appl. Catal.,
1984, 9, 109.
V. Solinas, R. Monaci, B. Marongiu and L. Forni, in Catalyst
Deactivation, ed. B. Delmon and G. F. Froment, Elsevier,
Amsterdam, 1987, p. 493.
The route for coke formation is probably through the same
intermediate involved in disproportionation, as shown in
Scheme 1 (adapted from ref. 21 and 22). As expected, the
higher disproportionation activity of HYd compared to
NaHY is associated with a higher coking activity (Fig. 10).
Dealkylation is suddenly suppressed as TOS increases (Fig. 9)
because of poisoning of the stronger sites by coke; com-
petition between disproportionation and isomerisation then
occurs on the remaining sites. The size of the condensation
products shown in Scheme 1 is such that they can only emerge
with great difficulty from the supercages. Besides enhancing
their tendency towards further condensation leading to poly-
aromatic coke, the location of these molecules in the super-
cages slows down the di†usion of reactants and products
through the supercages. The formation of the cumbersome
intermediate of disproportionation is thus hindered; further-
more, the di†usion of the cumbersome dialkylated naphtha-
lenes would be slow compared to that of 2-MN. Thus,
shape-selectivity e†ects induced by coke formation enhance
isomerisation selectivity.
As expected, over HMOR-5 and HMOR-11, both dispro-
portionation and coking are highly disfavoured (Fig. 7A and
B and 10), as the channel system without large cavities in
these zeolites is not spacious enough to allow the formation of
the bulky reaction intermediates. The concentration of the
acid sites able to catalyse 1-MN transformation is 788
lmol g~1 for HMOR-5 and 625 lmol g~1 for HMOR-11.
In spite of this, HMOR-5 is less active than HMOR-11 (cf.
Fig. 7A with 7B). This is due to the slow di†usion of the cum-
bersome reactant and products within the monodimensional
channel system of HMOR-5, where hindering interaction with
the active sites present at a high density is originated. The
accumulation of strongly adsorbed feed and/or product mol-
ecules is responsible for the severe decay in activity of
HMOR-5 (Fig. 8). This is supported by the Ðnding that a
deactivated HMOR-5 sample (4 h on-stream, conversion
\10%) gave a renewal of activity (conversion [30%) after
5
6
7
8
9
L. Forni, V. Solinas and R. Monaci, I. & E.C. Res., 1987, 26,
1860.
M. M. Neuber, S. Ernst, H. Geerts, P. J. Grobet, P. A. Jacobs,
G. T. Kokotailo and J. Weitkamp, in ref. 4, p. 567.
M. Neuber, H. G. Karge and J. Weitkamp, Catal. T oday, 1988, 3,
11.
H. K. Beyer, I. M. Belenykaja, F. Hange, M. Tielen, P. J. Grobet
and P. A. Jacobs, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday T rans. 1, 1985, 81, 2889.
G. Colon, I. Ferino, E. Rombi, E. Selli, L. Forni, P. Magnoux
and M. Guisnet, Appl. Catal., A, 1998, 168, 81.
10 N. Cardona-Martinez and J. A. Dumesic, J. Catal., 1990, 125,
427.
11 M. L. Poutsma, in Zeolite Chemistry and Catalysis, ed. J. A.
Rabo, ACS Monograph 171, American Chemical Society, Wash-
ington, 1976, p. 437.
12 S. Morin, N. S. Gnep and M. Guisnet, J. Catal., 1996, 159, 296.
13 S. Morin, N. S. Gnep and M. Guisnet, Proceedings Int. Symp.
AcidÈBase Catalysis III, Rolduc, April 20È24, 1997, p. 43.
14 M. Guisnet and N. S. Gnep, in Zeolites: Science and T echnology,
ed. F. R. Ribeiro, A. E. Rodriguez, L. D. Rollmann and C. Nac-
cache, NATO ASI Series, Martinus Nijhof, the Hague, 1984, p.
571.
15 P. Ratnasamy, S. Sivasankar and S. Vishnoi, J. Catal., 1981, 69,
428.
16 P. Cartraud, A. Cointot, M. Dufour, N. S. Gnep, M. Guisnet, G.
Joly and J. Tejada, Appl. Catal., 1986, 21, 85.
17 J. A. Martens, J. Perez-Pariente, E. Sastre, A. Corma and P. A.
Jacobs, Appl. Catal., 1988, 45, 85.
18 G. Bourdillon, C. Gueguen and M. Guisnet, Appl. Catal., 1990,
61, 123.
19 S. M. Csicsery, Zeolites, 1984, 4, 208.
20 M. Guisnet and P. Magnoux, Appl. Catal., 1989, 54, 1.
21 J. R. Anderson, Q-N. Dong, Y-F. Chang and R. J. Western, J.
Catal., 1991, 127, 113.
22 P. Magnoux, C. Cana†, F. Machado and M. Guisnet, J. Catal.,
1992, 134, 286.
Paper 8/03931C; Received 26th May, 1998
2652
J. Chem. Soc., Faraday T rans., 1998, V ol. 94