Page 7 of 8
Chemical Science
Please do not adjust margins
Journal Name
ARTICLE
In a further experiment, unlabeled product 31 was subjected to the
reaction conditions, to check whether the methyl groups were
stable to the conditions or would undergo exchange. No exchange
was seen in the methyl groups, although deuteration was seen on
the aryl rings,
Notes and references
DOI: 10.1039/D0SC00361A
1
(a) S. Tsuchiya, H. Saito, K. Nogi and H. Yorimitsu, Org. Lett.
2019, 21, 38553860. (b) H. Saito and H.Yorimitsu, H. Chem.
Lett. 2019, doi:10.1246/cl.190393
2
3
4
5
A. Fedorov, A. A. Toutov, N. A. Swisher and R. H. Grubbs,
Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 1640–1645.
A. A. Toutov, W.-B. Liu, K. N. Betz, A. Fedorov, B. M. Stoltz,
and R. H. Grubbs, Nature 2015, 518, 80–84.
. A. Toutov, W.-B. Liu, K. N. Betz, B. M. Stoltz and R. H.
Grubbs Nat. Protoc., 2016, 10, 1897–1903.
A. A. Toutov, M. Salata, A. Fedorov, Y.-F. Yang, Y. Liang, R.
Cariou, K. N. Betz, E. P. A. Couzijn, J. W. Shabaker, K. N. Houk,
Additionally, and mindful of reports that H2 gas is produced on
reaction of Et3SiH with KOtBu,2-7 those two reagents were heated
for 1 hour, and then the headspace in the vessel, containing
hydrogen, was replaced by deuterium gas and substrate 23 was
introduced. This led to formation of the dihydroacridine 31.
Examination of the 2H NMR spectrum showed deuterium
incorporation into the methyl group of the product [and a much
lesser degree of deuterium labelling of the Ar-H positions ortho to
the NH group]. The methyl group carbon appeared as a singlet plus
a 1:1:1 triplet, resulting from the presence of CH3 and CH2D (the
combined yield of the products was 72 %). Therefore, the gas in the
headspace is not inert to the reaction. We further examined what
happened when the hydrogen gas was removed and replaced by
inert gas (argon). In this case, the transformation from indole
substrate to dihydroacridine products was completely suppressed
to < 1 % yield.
and
R.
H.
Grubbs,
Nat.
Energy
2017,
doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2017.8
6
7
W.-B. Liu, D. P. Schuman, Y.-F. Yang, A. A. Toutov, Y. Liang, H.
F. T. Klare, N. Nesnas, M. Oestreich, D. G. Blackmond, S. C.
Virgil, S. Banerjee, R. N. Zare, R. H. Grubbs, K. N. Houk and B.
M. Stoltz, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 6867–6879.
S. Banerjee, Y.-F. Yang, I. D. Jenkins, Y. Liang, A. A. Toutov,
W.-B.; Liu, D. P. Schuman, R. H. Grubbs, B. M. Stoltz, E. H.
Krenske, K. N. Houk and R N.; Zare, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017,
139, 6880–6887.
8
9
A. J. Smith, A. Young, S. Rohrbach, E. F. O’Connor, M. Allison,
H.-S. Wang, D. L. Poole, T. Tuttle and J. A. Murphy, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 13747–13751.
W. Xie, S.-W. Park, H. Jung, D. Kim, M.-H. Baik and S.Chang, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 2018, 140, 9659–9668.
As a final point, we investigated whether the reaction was specific
to triethylsilane and to potassium tert-butoxide. Other silanes,
notably Me2PhSiH, MePh2SiH and Ph3SiH were also successful in the
conversion of 23 to 31. However, upon replacement of KOtBu with
NaOtBu (Table S1, entry 5), no reaction took place.
10 P. Asgari, Y. Hua, C. Thiamsiri, W. Prasitwatcharakorn, A.
Karedath, X. Chen, S. Sardar, K. Yum, G. Leem, B. S. Pierce, K.
Nam, J. Gao and J. Jeon, Nature Catalysis, 2019, 2, 164–173.
11 (a) A. A. Toutov, K. N. Betz, A. M. Romine, R. H. Grubbs, US
Patent Application US 2019/0218232A1. (b) F. Palumbo, S.
Rohrbach, T. Tuttle and J. A. Murphy, Helv. Chim. Acta, 2019,
in press DOI:10.1002/hlca.20190023.
12 In a different approach, that also adds electron density to
the indole, but not involving radicals or radical anions,
nucleophilic ring-opening of N-arylindoles by silyl anions,
R3SiLi, was reported: P. Xu, E.-U. Würthwein, C. G. Daniliuc
and A. Studer, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2017, 56, 13872–
13875.
13 We did consider the possibility of the indole fragmentation
in Scheme 3 arising, instead, from fragmentation of radical
40 rather than a radical anion 37. Radical 40 could arise by
hydrogen atom addition to the 2-position of the indole 22.
However, the literature features no reports of
fragmentations of the indole nucleus arising from radicals
like 40, in the presence of the Grubbs-Stoltz reagent or
under other conditions.
Conclusions
In summary, the Stoltz-Grubbs reducing system transforms N-
arylindoles into 9,10-dihydroacridines in moderate to excellent
yields. The ring-opening of the indole is triggered by fragmentation
of intermediate indole radical anions; the styrenes formed in this
fragmentation are then activated by potassium-ion-dependent
hydrogen atom transfer to afford the dihydroacridine products. The
transformation provides important information about the nature of
chemistry that is undertaken by the Et3SiH+KOtBu reagent.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
14 V. W. Bowry, J. Lusztyk, and K. U. Ingold, J. Chem. Soc. Chem.
Commun., 1990, 923–925.
15 (a) T. A. Halgren, J. D. Roberts, J. H. Horner, F. N. Martinez, C.
Tronche and M. Newcomb, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122,
2988–2994. (b) M. Newcomb, Vol.1, Ch. 5 in Encyclopedia of
Radicals in Chemistry, Biology and Materials Eds: A. Studer
and C. Chatgilialoglu, Wiley, 2012.
16 J. K. Crandall, G. L. Tindell and A. Manmade, Tetrahedron
Lett. 1982, 23, 3769–3772.
Acknowledgements
We thank the following sources for financial support: (i) GSK
and EPSRC for i–CASE awards (to AJS and DD) (ii) University of
Strathclyde Centre for studentship funding (ii) the EPSRC-
funded
ARCHIE-WeSt
High
Performance
Computer
grant no. EP/K000586/1
.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 7
Please do not adjust margins