Table 1. Palladium-catalyzed carbonylative synthesis of N-methyl phtha-
tween 74–82% of the N-methyl phthalazinone were ob-
served by using 4,5-bis(diphenylphosphino)-9,9-dimethylxan-
thene (XantPhos), bis(2-diphenylphosphinophenyl)ether
lazinone: Optimization of the model reaction.[a]
(DPEphos),
and
1,1-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene
(DPPF) as the ligand (Table 1, entries 20, 22–23). It should
be noted that apart from the desired product, dehalogena-
tion of 2-bromobenzaldehyde was observed in some cases,
and resulted in the formation of 1-benzylidene-2-methylhy-
drazine.
Based on our experiments and other previously reported
noncarbonylative cyclizations,[6] a possible reaction mecha-
nism is proposed in Scheme 3. The reaction starts with the
Entry
Ligand
Solvent
Base
NEt3
Additive
Yield [%][b]
[c]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
BuPAd2
BuPAd2
BuPAd2
BuPAd2
BuPAd2
BuPAd2
BuPAd2
BuPAd2
BuPAd2
BuPAd2
BuPAd2
BuPAd2
BuPAd2
BuPAd2
BuPAd2
BuPAd2
PPh3
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMSO
NMP
dioxane
toluene
heptane
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
0
0
2
36
7
TMEDA[d]
DiPEA[c]
DBU[d]
[c]
K2CO3
K3PO4
[d]
10
21[e]
37[e]
21[e]
18[e]
24[e]
9[e]
52
61
60
46
70
52
0
82
48
74
76
29
69
63
54
66
DBU[d]
DBU[d]
DBU[d]
DBU[d]
DBU[d]
DBU[d]
DBU[d]
DBU[d]
DBU[d]
DBU[d]
DBU[d]
DBU[d]
DBU[d]
DBU[d]
DBU[d]
DBU[d]
DBU[d]
DBU[d]
DBU[d]
DBU[d]
DBU[d]
DBU[d]
[d]
MgSO4
Na2SO4
MgSO4
MgSO4
MgSO4
MgSO4
MgSO4
MgSO4
MgSO4
MgSO4
MgSO4
MgSO4
MgSO4
MgSO4
[d]
[c]
[d]
[d]
PCy3
[d]
P
N
[d]
DPPF
[d]
DtBPF
XantPhos
DPEphos
BINAP
Diop
DPPB
DPPP
DPPE
[d]
[d]
[d]
[d]
Scheme 3. Proposed reaction mechanism.
[d]
[d]
[d]
condensation of the hydrazine and the aldehyde group, at
a lower temperature, to give A. Oxidative addition of the in
situ generated active Pd0 complex to A results in the aryl-
palladium complex B. After the coordination and insertion
of carbon monoxide, the acylpalladium complex C is pro-
duced. Next, either nucleophilic substitution and reductive
elimination or direct nucleophilic attack on the carbonyl
group gives the terminal product and the active Pd0 species
for the next catalytic cycle.
With suitable conditions for the model reaction in hand
(Table 1, entry 20), a large variety of substrates was investi-
gated for our protocol. As shown in Table 2, 20 examples of
different phthalazinones were isolated in moderate to good
yields (60–85%). In addition to simple alkylhydrazines (1),
arylhydrazines with electron-donating and -withdrawing sub-
stituents (2–6) were successfully applied in the reaction with
2-bromobenzaldehyde to give 60–80% yields of the corre-
sponding heterocycles (Table 2, entries 1–6).
Moreover, the reaction tolerates 2-bromobenzaldehyde
reagents with different electronic properties, and the corre-
sponding phthalazinone products were isolated in good
yields (Table 2, entries 7–19). Finally, we demonstrated that
in addition to 2-bromobenzaldehydes, 2-bromoacetophe-
none can also be successfully applied in this methodology,
and 2,4-dimethylphthalazinone was synthesized in 71%
yield in a straightforward manner (Table 2, entry 20).
MgSO4
[a] PdACHTUNGTRENNUNG(OAc)2 (2 mol%), ligand (6 mol% in the case of monodentate, and
2 mol% in the case of bidentate ligands), solvent (2 mL), base, 2-bromo-
benzaldehyde (1 mmol), methylhydrazine (1 mmol), CO (10 bar), 1008C,
16 h. TMEDA=N,N,N’,N’-tetramethylethylenediamine, DiPEA=N,N-
diisopropylethylamine, NMP=N-methylpyrrolidinone, Cy=cyclohexyl,
DtBPF=[1,1’-bis(di-tert-butylphosphino)ferrocene]dichloropalladium(II),
BINAP=2,2’-bis(diphenylphosphino)-1,1’-binaphthalene, Diop=2,3-O-
isopropyliden-2,3-dihydroxy-1,4-bis(diphenylphosphino)butane, DPPB=
1,4-(diphenylphosphino)butane, DPPP=1,3-bis(diphenylphosphino)pro-
pane, DPPE=1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane. [b] GC yield, deter-
mined by GC using hexadecane as the internal standard, based on 2-bro-
mobenzaldehyde. [c] 2 mmol of base or additive were added. [d] 1 mmol
of base or additive was added. [e] 1108C.
ing 1,8-diazabicycloACHTUNGTRENNUNG[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU) as the base
(Table 1, entry 4). The investigation of six different solvents
demonstrated that DMSO was optimal for this sequential
carbonylation reaction and gave 52% of the product at
1008C (Table 1, entry 13).
To improve the condensation step in the domino se-
quence, MgSO4 and Na2SO4 were tested as additives, and
slightly improved yields of the corresponding phthalazinones
were obtained (Table 1, entries 14 and 15; 60–61%). Nota-
bly, an excess of MgSO4 decreased the product yield to only
46% (Table 1, entry 16).
Next, we explored the influence of 13 different mono-
and bidentate phosphorus ligands (Table 1, entries 17–28).
In general, electron-rich and bulky ligands resulted in low
yields of the product. On the other hand, good yields be-
In conclusion, a general and straightforward methodology
for the carbonylative synthesis of pharmacologically inter-
esting phthalazinones has been established by using com-
&
2
&
ꢁ 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Chem. Eur. J. 0000, 00, 0 – 0
ÝÝ
These are not the final page numbers!