transition state and thus control coiling of the chain. The
substituent would exert little steric influence over the course
of the reaction and hence the stereoselectivity observed for
the reactions would be principally attributed to stereo-
electronic factors.
The earlier substrate leading to the formation of a quaternary
carbon with no substituent on C (9b) and substrates having
the substituent on C that did not require the formation of a
6
6
quaternary carbon (17e,f) all led to satisfactory yields of the
cyclized products. While the cyclization originating from 17d
did not lead to a high yield of the cyclized product, it was
informative in that it generated the cyclized products that
did form in an approximately 1:1 ratio. As in the earlier
cyclization of 9b there was no preference for the enol ether
radical cation to occupy a psuedoequatorial position. The
stereoselectivity of the cyclizations did not improve greatly
when the allylic methyl group (and hence the axial substituent
in a transition state like 13, Figure 1) was removed from the
substrate. Despite the absence of this methyl group, the
oxidation of both 17e and 17f still led to levels of selectivity
that were low relative to the selectivities obtained for the
oxidations leading to five-membered ring products (17e vs
Substrates 17a-c were electrolyzed using constant current
conditions (8 mA/2.0 F/mols), a reticulated vitreous carbon
9
(
RVC) anode, an undivided cell, a Pt cathode, and a 0.03
M tetraethylammonium tosylate in 30% MeOH/THF elec-
trolyte solution (Scheme 5).
Scheme 5
1
7a and 17f vs 17b). Clearly, the stereochemistry of the
reactions was not controlled by placing the enol ether radical
cation in the sterically less hindered psuedoequatorial posi-
tion, a situation that would have been favored by both the
more clearly defined equatorial and axial positions of a six-
membered ring transition state and the absence of the
pseudoaxial methyl group. The data supported the view that
the reactions were controlled by stereoelectronics.
With that backdrop, we turned our attention to the
synthesis of tetrahydrofuran building block 7. For this
cyclization it was hoped that the substituent at C of the
5
substrate would approximate the size of a tert-butyl group
and lead to a synthetically useful degree of stereoselectivity
The cyclization reactions leading to five-membered rings
17a-c) afforded selectivities that ranged from 5:1 and 4:1
when R was either a tert-butyl or an isopropyl group to 2.5:1
when R was a methyl group. The major products were
assigned as having trans stereochemistry because of the
(
(
Scheme 6). This effort began with an asymmetric cis-
1 5
presence of an NOE interaction between H and H (Scheme
5). The lower selectivity observed for the cyclization
originating from 17c was attributed to the inability of the
smaller methyl group to effectively control the conformation
of the coiling chain. The selectivities obtained for the
oxidations of 17a and 17b suggested that the stereochemistry
of the reactions was governed by stereoelectronic factors.
This suggestion was supported by the oxidations leading to
six-membered ring products.
Scheme 6
As in earlier intramolecular anodic coupling reactions,1,2
reactions leading to six-membered rings were not as efficient
as their five-membered ring counterparts. In the case of 17d
the cyclization led to only a 30% isolated yield of the
cyclized product. Similar reactions using isopropyl and tert-
butyl substituents in position R did not lead to any cyclized
material. These cyclizations were hindered by both the
6
formation of the quaternary center and the substituent at C .
(
7) Deslongchamps, P. Stereoelectronic Effects in Organic Synthesis;
Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1983. In particular note pages 32 and 33. For an
example involving the cyclization of an oxygen nucleophile onto an oxonium
ion, see: Pothier, N.; Goldstein, S.; Deslongchamps, P. HelV. Chim. Acta
1
992, 75, 604.
(
8) B u¨ rgi, H. B.; Dunitz, J. D.; Shefter, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95,
065. B u¨ rgi, H. B.; Dunitz, J. D. Acc. Chem. Res. 1983, 16, 153.
9) A 100 PPI electrode was used (available from The Electrosynthesis
5
(
Co., Inc.). The electrolyses were conducted utilizing a model 630 coulom-
eter, a model 410 potentiostatic controller, and a model 420A power supply
purchased from the Electrosynthesis Co., Inc. As an alternative the reactions
can be accomplished with a simple setup using a 6-V lantern battery as the
power supply. Frey, D. A.; Wu, N.; Moeller, K. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996,
3
7, 8317.
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 17, 2001
2687