through coordination to a metal center. In this connection,
we prepared molecule 3, in which a 2-nitrobenzyl pendant
arm has been covalently linked to the nitrogen atom of a
cyclam ring. The 2-susbstituted positional isomer was chosen
in order to favor the coordination of the nitro-nitronate group
to the metal, immobilized within the cyclam ring.
amine), are those expected for a low-spin ion.7 Most
importantly, the nitro group is completely excluded from the
coordination sphere, being far away from the metal center,
at a quite long distance: 4.83 Å, from NiII to the nearest
oxygen atom (O2). Probably because of steric reasons, the
nitro group is not coplanar with the aromatic ring, but the
two planes form an angle of 45.6°.
Cyclam and its derivatives firmly encircle divalent transi-
tion metal ions to give complexes, which are especially stable
with respect to demetalation.5 For instance, the square planar
[NiII(cyclam)]2+ complex lasts in 1 M HClO4 with a lifetime
τ ) 30 years.6 On reaction of NiII(CF3SO3)2 with 3 (LH),
the yellow diamagnetic [NiII(LH)](CF3SO3)2 complex salt
was obtained in a crystalline form, whose molecular structure
When dissolved in water, the metal complex shows an
intense absorption band at 330 nm, due to the nitrobenzyl
group, with a shoulder at 450 nm, which is ascribed to the
d-d transition of the low-spin square-planar NiII center, thus
confirming the noncoordination of the nitrobenzyl pendant
arm in solution. When the pH is increased through addition
of standard NaOH, no modification of the spectrum is
observed until pH 10, when the shoulder at 450 nm begins
to decrease and a new, weaker band develops at 550 nm.
Such a spectral pattern is typically noted in the presence of
a low-spin to high-spin conversion, which accompanies a
change of the coordination geometry from square-planar to
octahedral.7 It is suggested that, in basic solution, the -CH2-
group linking the cyclam ring to the 2-nitrobenzene fragment
undergoes deprotonation, which induces the following
events: (i) movement of the pendant arm toward the
metallocyclam subunit; (ii) electronic rearrangement to give
the anion of the nitronic acid; and (iii) formation of a
-
coordinative bond between one oxygen atom of the -NO2
group and the NiII center. At the same time, a water molecule
occupies the remaining site of the coordination octahedron.
The overall process is pictorially illustrated in Scheme 2.
Figure 1. ORTEP diagram of the [NiII(3)](CF3SO3)2‚CH3OH
complex. Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level.
Hydrogen atoms, triflate anions, and a methanol solvent molecule
have been omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles
(deg): Ni1-N1 1.985(4), Ni1-N2 1.945(4), Ni1-N3 1.933(5),
Ni1-N4 1.930(4); N1-Ni1-N2 93.68(18), N1-Ni1-N3 178.52-
(19), N1-Ni1-N4 88.03(17), N2-Ni1-N3 86.10(21), N2-Ni1-
N4 174.66(19), N3-Ni1-N4 92.32(20).
Scheme 2
was determined through X-ray diffraction studies. Figure 1
shows an ORTEP view of the metal complex.
The plot of absorbance at 450 nm vs pH (see inset, Figure
2) exhibits a sigmoidal profile, which has been fitted through
a nonlinear least-squares procedure,8 to give a pKA value of
10.71 ( 0.01 for the acid dissociation equilibrium: [NiII-
(LH)]2+ / [NiII(L-)]+ + H+. Solid and dashed lines in the
inset indicate the % concentration of the two species present
at the equilibrium, I and II (as illustrated in Scheme 2),
respectively, over the investigated pH range. On addition of
standard acid, the band at 450 nm is fully restored,
demonstrating the reversibility of the process.
The metal shows a regular square-planar coordination
geometry, the mean deviation for nitrogens from the N1-
N2-N3-N4 best plane being 0.055(5) Å, while the deviation
of Ni1 from such a plane is 0.032(1) Å. The NiII-N bond
distances, ranging from 1.936(5) Å (average of the three
NiII-secondary amine bonds) to 1.985(4) Å (NiII-tertiary
This indicates the intramolecular nature of the process and
confirms the hypothesis that deprotonation is facilitated by
coordination of the nitronate anion to the nickel(II) center.
(4) Schwo¨rer, M.; Wirz, J. HelV. Chim. Acta 2001, 84, 1441-1458.
(5) Busch, D. H. Acc. Chem. Res. 1978, 11, 392-400.
(6) Billo, E. J. Inorg. Chem. 1984, 23, 236-238.
(7) Boiocchi, M.; Fabbrizzi, L.; Foti, F.; Va´zquez, M. Dalton Trans. 2004,
2616-2620.
(8) Gans, P.; Sabatini, A.; Vacca, A. Talanta 1996, 43, 1739.
3418
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 16, 2005