COMMUNICATION
linear conformation observed for the terminal carbonyl
O(1)-C(26)-Rh(1) 176.3(13)°]. Similar semibridging car-
bonyl ligands were observed in the structure of [Rh (µ-CO)-
]. The two diphosphoxane oxygen atoms are
pointed in opposite directions in 2, giving a chair conforma-
tion for the Rh ring, as opposed to the boat conforma-
[
2
9
(
CO)
2
(µ-dppm)
2
2 4 2
P O
1
0
2 4 2
tion observed in the majority of M P C rings.
1
Although uncoordinated L is slowly hydrolyzed to form
PPh
2 2
P(O)Ph , hydrolysis of 1 is much faster under similar
conditions, suggesting the reaction to be metal-promoted. The
2
chelate complex [RhCl(PPh
prepared from a metal-promoted rearrangement and disrup-
tion of mutually cis Ph PO CCHdCH
ligands.11 The trans
3
)(L )] has previously been
2
2
2
1
orientation of the L ligands in 1 disfavors formation of the
analogous monomer [RhCl(CO)(L )] on hydrolysis, instead
promoting formation of the dimer 2 in which the trans
orientation of the phosphorus donors is maintained.
Figure 1. Molecular structure of 2, with carbonyls and chlorides shown
in one of the two positions. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (deg)
Rh(1)-Rh(1)′ 2.8683(9), Rh(1)-P(1) 2.292(1), Rh(1)-P(2)′ 2.299(1), Rh-
2
(
1)-Cl(1) 2.361(5), Rh(1)-Cl(2) 2.464(5), Rh(1)-C(26) 1.83(2), Rh(1)-
C(27) 1.84(2), P(1)-O(3) 1.636(3), P(2)-O(3) 1.651(3), P(1)-O(3)-P(2)
25.9(2). Primed atoms generated by symmetry transformation -x + 1,
y, -z.
1
-
In order to examine the generality of diphosphoxane dimer
3
formation, the ligand P(pyr)
pared from the reaction of P(pyr)
the presence of base and the analogous rhodium chemistry
2
{NC
4
3
H C(O)Me} L was pre-
2
Cl with 2-acetylpyrrole in
3
studied. The reaction of L with [Rh
2
(µ-Cl)
2 4
(CO) ] gave
3
[
RhCl(CO)(L ) ] 3, and IR spectra demonstrated the presence
2
-
1
-1
of both ν(CO) (1997 cm ) and ν(CdO) (1653 cm ). On
stirring complex 3 in wet toluene at 60 °C, a darkening of
color was observed, and on standing, deep red crystals of 4
precipitated. The IR spectrum of 4 showed the presence of
2
Figure 2. Orientations of [Rh2Cl(CO)(µ-Cl)(µ-CO)(µ-L )2] required to
give the observed disordered structure of 2.
-
1
a terminal carbonyl (2031 cm ) and the absence of the acetyl
related cationic complexes [Rh
2
(CO)
2
(µ-Cl)(µ-CO)(µ-L)
]+
2
1
stretch. H NMR spectroscopy again showed loss of the
-acetylpyrrole functionality. The P{ H} NMR spectrum
(
L ) dppm, PPh NHPPh ) have previously been structurally
2
2
3
1
1
2
6
characterized.
Compound 2 is the first reported example of a rhodium
dimer containing bridging PPh OPPh ligands, though rhod-
ium dimers incorporating the related bridging ligand bis-
diphenylphosphino)methane (dppm) have been widely stud-
consists of a broad apparent doublet of triplets consistent
1
2
with a dimeric structure.
The identity of 4 was confirmed crystallographically as
2
2
13
4
4
[Rh
2
Cl
2
(CO)
2
(µ-L )
2
2 2
] [L ) P(pyr) OP(pyr) ] (Figure 3). In
(
7
contrast to 2, the chloride and carbonyl ligands are terminally
coordinated and there is no disorder in the structure. The
geometry around each rhodium center is square-planar, and
the Rh‚‚‚Rh distance, 3.1177(3) Å, is considerably longer
than that observed in 2 and clearly indicates the absence of
a Rh-Rh bond. This was also the case in the structure of
ied. Analysis of the Rh-Rh distances from complexes
containing the Rh (µ-dppm) skeleton shows that the distance
2
2
in 2 [2.8683(9) Å] lies within the ranges observed both for
compounds which contain a Rh-Rh bond [2.52-3.01 Å
8
(
mean 2.77 Å)] and for those in which a Rh-Rh bond is
absent [2.83-3.47 Å (mean 3.16 Å)]. The P‚‚‚P separation
between the phosphorus atoms of the same ligand (2.93 Å)
is longer than the Rh-Rh distance, indicating compression
along the Rh-Rh internuclear axis, though this may be due
to the presence of the bridging ligands. These bridges are
highly unsymmetric, with Rh-C(27) distances of 1.84(2) and
[
Rh
2
Cl
2
(CO)
2
2
(µ-dppm) ], though for this compound the
1
4
Rh‚‚‚Rh distance is still longer [3.2386(5) Å]. The angle
between the mean plane of the rhodium coordination sphere
[Rh(1), C(17), Cl(1), P(1), and P(2)′] and the mean plane of
the dimer framework [Rh(1), P(1), P(2), Rh(1)′, P(1)′, and
4
P(2)′] in 4 is 82°, and the deviation of the L oxygen atom
2.69(3) Å and Rh-Cl(2) distances of 2.464(5) and 2.889(6)
Å, respectively; hence the ligands are best described as
semibridging. This is further reflected in the bond angles,
with the bridging carbonyl ligands [Rh(1)-C(27)-O(2)
(
9) Woodcock, C.; Eisenberg, R. Inorg. Chem. 1985, 24, 1285.
10) Anderson, D. J.; Kramarz, K. W.; Eisenberg, R. Inorg. Chem. 1996,
5, 2688.
(
(
(
3
11) Irvine, D. J.; Glidewell, C.; Cole-Hamilton, D. J.; Barnes, J. C.; Howie,
A. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1991, 1765.
12) Davis, A. L.; Goodfellow, R. J. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1993,
2273.
165.7(12)°] showing a relatively small deviation from the
(6) (a) Cowie, M. Inorg. Chem. 1979, 18, 286. (b) Olmstead, M. M.;
Lindsay, C. H.; Benner, L. S.; Balch, A. L. J. Organomet. Chem. 1979,
(13) X-ray data for 4: C34H32Cl2N8O4P4Rh2‚C7H8, M ) 1109.44, T ) 293-
179, 289. (c) Liehr, G.; Szucs a´ nyi, G.; Ellermann, J. J. Organomet.
(2) K, monoclinic, C2/c, a ) 19.8250(2) Å, b ) 11.8230(2) Å, c )
3
Chem. 1984, 265, 95.
20.9580(3) Å, â ) 110.9461(7)°, V ) 4587.74(11) Å , Z ) 4, Fc )
-
3,
-1
(
(
7) Puddephatt, R. J. Chem. Soc. ReV. 1983, 12, 99.
8) (a) Fletcher, D. A.; McMeeking, R. F.; Parkin, D. J. Chem. Inf.
Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 746. (b) Allen, F. H.; Kennard, O. Chem. Des.
Autom. News 1993, 8, 31.
1.606 g cm µ ) 1.025 mm ; 26407 reflections collected of which
5218 independent [Rint ) 0.0487]. Final R indices [I > 2σ(I)] R1 )
0.0283, wR2 ) 0.0752.
(14) Cowie, M.; Dwight, S. K. Inorg. Chem. 1980, 19, 2500.
1696 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 41, No. 7, 2002