9868 Tao
Asian J. Chem.
TABLE-2
THERMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS OF Si(3)N-GA
∆Hom (KJ/mol)
∆Som (J·K-1/mol)
-∆Gom (KJ/mol)
T·∆Som (KJ/mol)
Temperature(K)
298
303
308
313
2.510
9.236
12.38
8.634
106.0
128.0
137.7
124.0
29.247
29.781
30.042
30.177
31.588
38.784
42.412
38.812
The data available indicate that the negative values of ∆Gom
are mainly due to the large positive values of ∆Som. ∆Hom is
positive and is much smaller than the value of T∆Som. There-
fore, the micellization process is governed primarily by the
entropy gain associated with it and the driving force for the
process is the tendency of the hydrophobic group of the
surfactant to transfer from the solvent environment to the
interior of the micelle.
This large entropy increase on micellization in aqueous
medium has been explained in two ways: (1) structuring of
the water molecules surrounding the siloxane chains in
aqueous medium, resulting in an increase in the entropy of
the system when the siloxane chains are removed from the
aqueous medium to the interior of the micelle-hydrophobic
bonding; (2) increased freedom of the hydrophobic chain in
the nonpolar interior of the micelle compared to the aqueous
environment
of the system. The enthalpy entropy compensation plots for
the Si(3)N-GA in all the solvent mixtures showed a good corre-
lation between the thermodynamic parameters. The plots
indicate that the change in ∆Hom is effectively balanced by a
corresponding change in ∆Som.
Free energy and enthalpy were negative whereas entropy
was positive. The minimal effect of temperature on the thermo-
dynamic parameters indicates that the process of micellization
was spontaneous in nature.
Conclusion
By using Wilhelmy plate method, the surface tension of
Si(3)N-GA at different temperatures (298-313 K). The results
show that with the increase of temperature, the critical
micelle concentration (CMC) of Si(3)N-GA slightly decreases,
but the maximum surface excess concentration at the air/
water interface increases. The micellization free energies
(∆G°mic) are in the range -29.247--30.177 kJ mol-1 in the studied
ranges of temperature. The process of micellization of Si(3)N-
GA in aqueous solution is mainly driven by the entropy.
An increase in temperature seems to cause both ∆Hom and
∆Som to become more positive, presumably because both the
amount of water structured by the hydrophobic chain and the
amount of water bound by the hydrophilic sugar group in the
nonmicellar species increase with increase in temperature,
resulting in a increase in ∆Hom and ∆Som, respectively. Since
these two parameters have opposite effects on ∆Gom, it may
become more negative or less negative with temperature
change, depending on the relative magnitude of the changes
in ∆Ho and ∆So . From the above data, ∆Go appears to
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors acknowledged the financial support ofYouth
Fund of Taiyuan University of Science and Technology (No.
20113009) and the National Natural Science Foundation of
China.
m
m
m
REFERENCES
become more negative with increase in temperature.
The values of ∆Hom in Table-2 indicate that the micelli-
zation processes in water are exothermic. The variation of ∆Hom
with temperature is due to a change in the hydration of the
head groups during micellization. The micellization of surfac-
tants in water may be understood on the basis of water structure
and hydrophobic interaction. Generally, the structure of liquid
water is considered in terms of a 3-dimensional hydrogen
bonded ''flickering cluster'' which retains much of the ordered
structure of ice. The entropy change is positive in all cases.
However it decreases with increasing temperature. The positive
values of standard entropy of micelle formation ∆Som are due
to the melting of ''flickering cluster'' around hydrocarbon tails
of the surfactant monomer and the increased randomness of
the hydrocarbon chains in the micelle core.Amphiphilic mono-
mers with a long hydrocarbon chain increase the orderliness
of water by formation of a ''Frank-Evan iceberg'' around the
hydrocarbon chain. This results in a decrease in the entropy
1. M. Hato, H. Minamikawa and T. Kato, Surfact. Sci. Ser., 143, 361
(2009).
2. R.M. Hill, Surfact. Sci. Ser., 86, 1 (1999).
3. G.Y. Wang, Z.P. Du, W. Zhang and Q.Y. Cao, Tenside Surfact. Deter-
gents, 46, 214 (2009).
4. R. Wagner, Y. Wu, L. Richter, J. Reiners, J. Weissmuller and A. De
Montigny, Appl. Organomet. Chem., 13, 21 (1999).
5. K. Loos, G. Jonas and R. Stadler, Macromol. Chem. Phys., 202, 3210
(2001).
6. F. Han and G. Zhang, Tenside, Surfact. Deterg., 40, 332 (2003).
7. F. Han and G. Zhang, Colloids Surf. A, 237, 79 (2004).
8. G.Y. Wang, W.S. Qu, Z.P. Du, Q.Y. Cao and Q.X. Li, J. Phys. Chem. B,
115, 3811 (2011).
9. G. Wang, Z. Du, Q. Li and W. Zhang, J. Phys. Chem. B, 114, 6872
(2010).
10. G.Y. Wang, W.S. Qu, Z.P. Du, W.X. Wang and Q.X. Li, J. Phys. Chem. B,
117, 3154 (2013).
11. K. Sakai, S. Umezawa, M. Tamura, Y. Takamatsu, K. Tsuchiya, K.
Torigoe, T. Ohkubo, T. Yoshimura, K. Esumi and H. Sakai, J. Colloid
Interf. Sci., 318, 440 (2008).
12. S.A. Snow, Langmuir, 9, 424 (1993).