44
V. Bansal et al. / Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic 64 (2010) 38–44
that active-site polarity and hydration do affect enzyme activity,
but that this effect was also dependent on the solvent used [32].
Actually, our results show that initially (when first introduced to
an organic solvent) the enzyme retains the polarity of the aqueous
solution from which it was last dissolved in, and changes in enzyme
polarity are a slow process which might involve penetration of the
solvent onto the enzyme fold. In a system whose water activity is
controlled, besides the equal hydration of enzyme and solvent, the
2 h incubation period (required for the experiment) would allow
for some solvent molecules to enter the enzyme fold, and therefore
change the active-site polarity as we observed.
We propose that prolonged exposure to organic solvents leads
to a decrease in enzyme dynamics and active-site polarity, and a
reorientation of the active site inhibitors. These affect the ionization
state of the catalytic triad residues as well as the transition states
and intermediates’ stability, resulting in reduced enzyme activity,
Research Resources, and the National Institutes of Health (SCORE).
The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not
necessarily represent the official view of the National Center for
Research Resources or the National Institutes of Health. In addition,
the authors would like to thank Dr. Carmelo Garcia and Dr. Roland
Oyola from the University of Puerto Rico at Humacao for their assis-
tance in the use of and for providing us access to the Fluorescence
Spectrophotometer.
References
[1] J.F. Amorim Fernandez, P. Halling, Biotechnol. Prog. 18 (2002) 1455–1457.
[2] C.O. Fagain, Enzyme Microbial Technol. 33 (2003) 137–149.
[3] E.A. Susimar Gonzalez Martinez, L. Vergara Cordero, A. Ferrer, I. Montanez-
Clemente, G. Barletta, Biotechnol. Prog. 18 (2002) 1462–1466.
[4] K. Griebenow, A.M. Klibanov, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92 (1995)
10969–10976.
[5] K. Griebenow, A.M. Klibanov, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 53 (1997) 351–362.
[6] K. Griebenow, A.M. Klibanov, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118 (1996) 1195–11700.
[7] Y. Zheng, R.L. Ornstein, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118 (1996) 4175–4180.
[8] A. Dong, J.D. Meyer, B.S. Kendrick, M.C. Manning, J.F. Carpenter, Arch. Biochem.
Biophys. 334 (1996) 406–414.
Vmax and KM
.
5. Conclusion
[9] V.B. Betzaida Castillo, A. Ganesan, P. Peter Halling, F. Secundo, A. Ferrer, K.
Griebenow, G. Barletta, BMC Biotechnol. 51 (2006).
[10] B. Castillo, Y. Pacheco, W. Al-Azzam, K. Griebenow, M. Devi, A. Ferrer, G. Barletta,
J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 35 (2005) 147–153.
[11] E. Fasoli, A. Ferrer, G.L. Barletta, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 102 (2009) 1025–1032.
[12] A. Cruz, E. Ramirez, A. Santana, G. Barletta, G. Lopez, Mol. Simulat. (2009)
1–8.
[13] F.C.G. Secundo, G. Vecchio, F. Zambianchi, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 64 (1999)
624–629.
[14] R. Bovara, G. Carrea, A.M. Gioacchini, S. Riva, F. Secundo, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 54
(1997) 50–57.
[15] R.J.S. Betzaida Castillo, A. Ferrer, G. Barletta, K. Griebenow, Biotechnol. Bioeng.
99 (2008) 9–17.
[16] W.L. Vaz, G. Schoellmann, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 439 (1976) 194–205.
[17] W.L. Vaz, G. Schoellmann, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 439 (1976) 206–219.
[18] D.C.B.L. Turner, Biochemistry 10 (1968) 10.
Previous studies have shown that an enzyme’s initial activ-
ity in organic solvents decreases after prolonged exposure to this
medium. It was also reported that this effect was unrelated to
structural perturbations of the enzymes under study, since their
structures remained “unharmed”. Considering those studies and
the fluorescence spectroscopic results presented here, we suggest a
mechanism that involves two possible orientations/conformations
of the active site bound fluorophore after prolonged exposure of
PEG-SC to ACN and 1,4-dioxane. The dominant conformation of
the inhibitor (or substrate), upon initial exposure to organic sol-
vents is the one that interacts to a greater extent with the active
side residues. During incubation there is a gradual transition of the
active site bound fluorophore to a more flexible and mobile confor-
mation that has less interaction with the active site environment.
These changes seem to be brought about by water stripping effect
and the movement of solvent molecules into the enzyme fold that
brings about polarity changes in the active site. In the case of a
bound substrate in the enzyme active site in an organic solvent, we
believe that the first substrate conformation and active-site polar-
ity (similar to that in aqueous solvent) favors catalysis more than
the later conformation that results after prolonged exposure to the
organic solvent. However, additional studies are needed to rule out
other possible mechanisms and to unequivocally ascertain the con-
tribution of enzyme dynamics, active-site polarity and substrate
reorientation to the phenomenon of enzyme partial inactivation
upon prolonged exposure to organic solvents.
[19] E.M. Kosower, JACS 80 (1958) 3253–3260.
[20] K. Griebenow, Y. Laureano, A.M. Santos, I. Montanez-Clemente, L. Rodriguez,
M.W. Vidal, G. Barletta, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121 (1999) 8157–8163.
[21] A. Fersht, Enzyme Structure and Mechanism, 2nd ed., Freeman and Company,
New York, 1985.
[22] A.F.S.A. Habeeb, H.G. Cassidy, S.J. Singer, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 29 (1958)
587–593.
[23] P.K.K.R. Smith, G.T. Hermanson, A.K. Mallia, F.H. Gartner, M.D. Provenzano,
E.K. Fujimoto, N.M. Goeke, B.J. Olson, D.C. Klenk, Anal. Biochem. 150 (1985)
76–85.
[24] E.N. Vulfson, P.J. Halling, H.L. Holland, Enzymes in Nonaqueous Solvents, Meth-
ods and Protocols Humana Press, Totowa, New Jersey, 2001.
[25] L. Stryer, J. Mol. Biol. 13 (1965) 482–495.
[26] K.J.S.A. Willis, Biochemistry 28 (1989) 4902–4908.
[27] M.R. Eftink, in: C.H. Suelter (Ed.), Methods of Biochemical Analysis, John Wiley
& Sons, Inc., 1991, pp. 127–205.
[28] J. Broos, A.J.W.G. Visser, J.F.J. Engbersen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117 (1995)
12657–12663.
[29] J.R. Lakowicz, Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy, 3rd ed., Springer, 2006.
[30] N.C.B.R.N. Genov, Biochem. J. 238 (1986) 923–926.
[31] R.K. Eppler, E.P. Hudson, S.D. Chase, J.S. Dordick, J.A. Reimer, D.S. Clark, Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105 (2008) 15672–15677.
Acknowledgements
[32] E.P. Hudson, R.K. Eppler, J.M. Beaudoin, J.S. Dordick, J.A. Reimer, D.S. Clark, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 131 (2009) 4294–4300.
The project described was supported by Grants P20 RR016470,
S06 GM-08216, and GM-08102 from the National Center for