10.1002/anie.201811037
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
COMMUNICATION
Figure 3. Structural insight and solution processability study of IPMOPs. (a) Contact areas between cages: (I) IPMOP-A; (II) IPMOP-PA. (b) 195 K CO2 sorption
isotherms for phase-I (as-synthesized), and phase-III (reprecipitation after dissolving in THF) of IPMOP-PA. Phase-II represents THF-dissolved solution phase for
IPMOP-PA. (c) Water droplet cast on the surface of the pelletized IPMOPs: WCA values for (I) IPMOP-A: ~74°; (II) IPMOP-V: ~118°; (III) IPMOP-IL: ~130°; (IV)
IPMOP-PA: ~155°.
increases in the order of IPMOP-A <IPMOP-PA, as attributed to
Acknowledgements
the increasing size of alkyl functional group of the substituted
diimide linkers. Figure 3a shows structures of the two IPMOPs,
green circles highlight the contact areas between neighbouring
cages. It is obvious that the contact area increases with
increasing size of alkyl functional groups involved. In Figure 3a,
the -CH3 groups of IPMOP-A offer only a small contact area
while in IPMOP-PA, the aromatic groups are interpenetrate
between the neighbouring cages i.e. leading to maximal contact
area. With increasing contact area, increasing binding energy
leads to stronger interactions, corresponding to the maintenance
of long range order in solid state, which is consistent with our
experimental observations.
S. M. is thankful to UGC for research fellowship. A.V. D. and
Y.D.M. are thankful to IISER-Pune for research fellowship.
M.S.L. acknowledges the National Research Foundation of
Korea (2016R1A5A1009405) for financial support. The authors
also acknowledge PAL for beam line use (2016-1st-2D-005) and
2016-3rd-2D-026).We are grateful to IISER-Pune for research
facilities. INSA (Project No: IISER-P/GAP-142/7/2014), SERB
(Project No. EMR/2016/000410) and DST-FIST (SR/FST/CSII-
023/2012;
for
micro-focus
SCXRD
instrument)
are
acknowledged for generous funding. The authors thank to G. R.
Tripathy and his student (IISER-Pune) for helping ICP analysis
measurements.
Unlike extended frameworks, solution-processability of MOPs
offer multifarious advantages over other porous materials.[41]
Encouraged by our obtained results, solution-processability for
IPMOP-PA was assessed and found to be solution-processable
in tetrahydrofuran (THF); as confirmed by gas sorption
measurement of Phase-I (as-synthesized) and Phase-III
(reprecipitation after dissolving in THF) (Figure 3b and Figure
S81-S86, Table S2). Among this IPMOP series, we observed
that the solubility increases with increasing size of the alkyl
functional groups upto a certain limit, beyond which the MOP
solubility decreases with higher alkyl groups. Among IPMOPs,
IPMOP-A is insoluble in common solvents, while rest are soluble
in THF (Figure S87-S92 and Table S3), and thus solubility was
found to increase from IPMOP-V to IPMOP-PA to IPMOP-IL. For
hydrophobicity, the surface hydrophobicity was confirmed from
water contact angle (WCA) measurements of all IPMOPs (Figure
3c) and found that WCA also tuned from hydrophilic (WCA~74º)
to superhydrophobic region (WCA~154º) (Table S4) for the first
time for MOPs system.
Keywords: metal-organic polyhedra • carboxylate MOPs •
chemically stable MOPs • copper paddlewheel based MOPs •
hydrophobicity.
[1] I. V. Kolesnichenko, E. V. Anslyn, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 2385-2390.
[2] B. Moulton, M. J. Zaworotko, Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 1629-1658.
[3] O. K. Farha, I. Eryazici, N. C. Jeong, B. G. Hauser, C. E. Wilmer, A. A.
Sarjeant, R. Q. Snurr, S. B. T. Nguyen, A. O. Yazaydin, J. T. Hupp, J.
AM. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 15016-15021.
[4] R. Matsuda, R. Kitaura, S. Kitagawa, Y. Kubota, R. V. Belosludov, T. C.
Kobayashi, H. Sakamoto, T. Chiba, M. Takata, Y. Kawazoe, Y. Mita,
Nature 2005, 436, 238-241.
[5] Y. Cui, Y. Yue, G. Qian, B. Chen, Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 1126-1162.
[6] H.-C. Zhou, J. R. Long, O. M. Yaghi, Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 673-674.
[7] H.-C. Zhou, S. Kitagawa, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5415-54118.
[8] M. C. So, G. P. Wiederrecht, J. E. Mondloch, J. T. Hupp, O. K. Farha,
Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 3501-3510.
[9] M. Eddaoudi, J. Kim, J. B. Wachter, H. K. Chae, M. O'Keeffe, O. M. Yaghi,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 4368-4369.
[10] H. Abourahma, A. W. Coleman, B. Moulton, B. Rather, P, Shahgaldian, M.
J. Zaworotko, Chem. Commun. 2001, 2380-2381.
A potentially extensive class of ultra-stable material is afforded
by employing hydrophobic shielding as a cornerstone design
principle. This basic outline principle can be used to attain
chemical stability of MOP compounds, where metal-ligand bond
is weak in nature. The strategic decoration of diverse alkyl
groups on the outer surface of the cages (stemming from the
ligands) not only increased the hydrophobicity around the metal
center, but also assisted in retaining the robust nature of the
overall framework, affirmed from molecular simulations. We
believe, the present findings for realization of chemically
addressable MOPs will offer simple, straight forward strategic
approaches for the development of diverse stable cage based
frameworks for future applications.
[11] A. J. Howarth, Y. Liu, P. Li, Z. Li, T. C. Wang, J. T. Hupp, O. K. Farha, Nat.
Rev. Mater. 2016, 1, 15018-
[12] H. Assi, G. Mouchaham, N. Steunou, T. Devic, C. Serre, Chem. Soc. Rev.
2017, 46, 3131-3452.
[13] G, Mouchaham, S. Wang, C. Serre, The Stability of Metal-Organic
Frameworks, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2018.
[14] P. G. M. Mileo, T. Kundu, R. Semino, V. Benoit, N. Steunou, P. L.
Llewellyn, C. Serre, G. Maurin, S. Devautour-Vinot, Chem. Mater. 2017,
29, 7263-7271.
[15] S. Kandambeth, V. Venkatesh, D. B. Shinde, S. Kumari, A. Halder, S.
Verma, R. Banerjee, Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6786-6795.
[16] M. Dan-Hardi, C. Serre, T. Frot, L. Rozes, G. Maurin, C. Sanchez, G.
Ferey, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 10857-10859.
[17] D. J. Tranchemontagne, Z. Ni, M. O'Keeffe, O. M. Yaghi, Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 2-14.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.