Jianghao Wu et al. / Chinese Journal of Catalysis 34 (2013) 2236–2244
2. Experimental
sure distillation on a rotary evaporator under reduced pressure
at 40–50 °C, which gave a yellow powder. This catalyst was
[D12mim]1.5PW4O24.
2.1. Preparation of catalysts
The procedure for the synthesis of the catalysts is shown in
Scheme 1. The preparation of [D12mim]1.5PW4O24 is used as an
example.
2.2. Characterization of catalyst structure
FT‐IR spectra were recorded on an ABB FTLA2000 FT‐IR
spectrometer (Canada) (KBr discs, 4000–500 cm–1). TGA was
carried out with a METTLER‐TOLEDO TGA/1100SF instrument
(Switzerland) in N2 at a heating rate of 10 °C/min. Elemental
analyses (C, H, and N) were performed on a CHN elemental
analyzer (Elementar Vario EL III, Germany). The 1H NMR spec‐
tra were recorded on an AVANCE III 400 MHz digital NMR
spectrometer (Bruker, Germany) using a CDCl3 solvent.
2.1.1. Synthesis of N‐alkylimidazole
The synthesis of N‐dodecylimidazole was used as an example.
N-dodecyl bromide (7 g, 28 mmol) was dissolved in dimethyl
formamide (DMF, 25 mL) and then added to a solution of the
sodium salt of imidazole, which was formed by the reaction of
imidazole (2.3 g, 33.9 mmol) with sodium hydride (1.4 g, 62
mmol) in DMF (25 mL). The mixture was heated at 60 °C for 6
h, cooled, and then filtered. The filtrate was washed with brine
and water, and then dried with sodium sulfate. The solvent was
separated by reduced pressure distillation and N‐alkylimidaz‐
2.3. Epoxidation procedure
Cyclohexene (9 mmol), CH3CN (10 mL), and catalyst (0.1 g)
were added to a 25 mL flask. The reaction started after the ad‐
dition of aqueous H2O2 (30 wt%, 3 mmol) at 60 °C within 10
min under vigorous stirring. After the reaction, the product
mixture was analyzed by gas chromatography (GC). The cata‐
lyst was recovered by filtration immediately after the reaction
ready for the next reaction (run). The conversion (X) and selec‐
tivity (S) were calculated as follows:
X = (mol epoxide product + mol byproducts) / (mol initial
H2O2) × 100%
S = (mol epoxide product) / (mol epoxide product + mol
byproducts) × 100%
1
ole was obtained as a pale yellow oily product. H NMR (400
MHz, CDCl3) δ = 7.45 (s, 1H, CH), 7.04 (s, 1H, CH), 6.90 (s, 1H,
CH), 3.91 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H, CH2), 1.77 (m, J = 13.5 Hz, 2H, CH2),
1.27 (m, J = 13.1 Hz, 18H, CH2), 0.88 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H, CH3).
2.1.2. Synthesis of dicationic imidazolium ionic liquids
Dicationic imidazolium ionic liquids were prepared by re‐
fluxing N‐dodecylimidazole (4.72 g, 20 mmol) and 1,4‐dibro‐
mobutane (2.16 g, 10 mmol) in isopropanol (25 mL) at 80 °C
for 24 h. Then, the products were washed with diethyl ether
four times under vacuum. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 10.18
(s, 2H, CH2), 8.12 (s, 2H, CH), 7.29 (s, 2H, CH), 4.58 (s, 4H, CH2),
4.27 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 4H, CH2), 2.19 (s, 4H, CH2), 1.90 (d, J = 6.4 Hz,
4H, CH2), 1.25 (m, 36H, CH2), 0.88 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 6H, CH3).
All of the olefin substrates were tested using the same pro‐
cedure.
3. Results and discussion
2.1.3. Synthesis of dicationic alkyl imidazolium peroxopolyoxo‐
tungsten‐based catalyst [20]
3.1. Catalyst structure and thermal stability
A suspension of tungstic acid (2.50 g, 10 mmol) in 7.93 g (70
mmol) of 30% aqueous H2O2 was stirred and heated at 60 °C
until a colorless solution was obtained. After filtering and cool‐
ing the solution at room temperature, 40 wt% H3PO4 (0.62 g,
2.5 mmol) was added, and the solution was diluted with 30 mL
of water and then stirred for 30 min. Dicationic imidazolium
ionic liquid (3.75 mmol) in dichloromethane (40 mL) was add‐
ed dropwise to the resultant solution with strong stirring over
a period of more than 2 min. Stirring was continued for an ad‐
ditional 60 min. The organic phase was then separated, dried
over Na2SO4, filtered, and gently evaporated by reduced pres‐
The TGA curves of the catalysts are shown in Fig. 1. The hy‐
brid catalysts were stable up to 200 °C (region I), indicating
that these catalysts are thermally stable. The slight mass loss is
due to the removal of the combination water. The mass loss
between 250 and 600 °C is due to decomposition of the organic
components in the catalyst (region II), which is consistent with
the CHN elemental analysis (Table 1). Thus, these results con‐
firm that the molar of cantion and polyanion of the catalysts is
1.5:1, and the hybrids have the chemical formulas shown in
Scheme 1.
Br
(
)
CH2 4
R-Br
Br
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
NH
Br-
Br-
R
R
R
R:
CnH
2n+1 (n = 1, 4, 8, 12, 16)
H2WO4+H2O2+ H3PO4
(
)
CH2 4
[Dnmim]1.5PW4O24
(n = 1, 4, 8, 12, 16)
-
3
PW4O24
R 1.5
N
N
N
N
R
Scheme 1. Typical preparation procedure of the catalysts.