the group 14DMX (ca. 60¡) than of the molecules 14ANX (ca.
20¡). In the relaxed S state, both series of 1-naphthylamines
1
have become largely planar, as deduced from the similarity of
their Ñuorescence spectra.
The substituent X and the solvent polarity exert their inÑu-
ence on E by changing the energy gap *E(S ,S ), which
IC
1 2
governs the vibronic coupling between the potential energy
surfaces of S and S . This coupling Ñattens the S surface
1
2
1
when *E(S ,S ) becomes smaller, leading to a lowering of the
1 2
barrier E for the reaction from S to the ground state.
IC
1
After relaxation of the primarily excited S (FC) state to the
1
equilibrated S state, the IC reaction pathway is assumed to
1
Fig. 11 Potential surfaces of the electronic ground state S and the
0
two lowest excited singlet states
S
and
S
for the 1-
pass through a conical intersection of the S and S potential
1
2
1
0
aminonaphthalenes undergoing internal conversion (IC). The reaction
energy surfaces. This conical intersection exists as a conse-
coordinate m involves the amino twist angle. Light is absorbed to a
quence of the horizontal shift *m of the S and S surfaces
FranckÈCondon S state and Ñuorescence occurs after relaxation. The
1
0
1
caused by the di†erent amino twist angles and bond lengths of
surface of S is Ñattened by vibronic coupling with S . E is the acti-
1
2
IC
the 1-naphthylamines in these states. The increase in E when
vation energy for the non-adiabatic IC reaction from the equilibrated
IC
S
state to S . *E(S ,S ) is the energy gap between S and S .
the solvent polarity becomes larger is attributed to a prefer-
1
0
1
2
1
2
ential stabilisation of the S state relative to S , due to the
1
2
larger dipole moment of the former state. This increase in
two lowest excited singlet states S and S caused by the small
1
2
*E(S ,S ) reduces the vibronic coupling between the two
energy gap *E(S ,S ).5 For the IC reaction taking place with
1 2
1 2
states, which leads to a larger barrier for the IC reaction.
the 14DMX and 14ANX molecules investigated here, the
same mechanism is adopted (see Fig. 11).
After excitation to the S (FC) state with the same amino
1
Acknowledgements
twist angle as in S , a fast equilibration process sets in, involv-
0
ing the planarisation of the amino group of the 1-
Thanks are due to J. Bienert, W. Bosch, H. Lesche and J.
Schimpfhauser, Max-Planck-Institut fur biophysikalische
Chemie, Gottingen, for expert technical assistance. We also
thank Professor J. Nishimura, Gunma University, for the syn-
thesis of 4-methoxy-1-(dimethylamino)naphthalene. This work
was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for ScientiÐc
Research from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Science
and Culture.
naphthylamines. The thermally activated IC reaction then
starts from the relaxed S state. The S potential energy
1
1
surface is Ñattened by vibronic coupling between S and S ,
1
2
when the energy gap *E(S ,S ) is sufficiently small,53h55
which lowers the IC energy barrier E . The height of the IC
activation energy E therefore depends on the strength of the
1 2
IC
IC
vibronic coupling, governed by the gap *E(S ,S ), and also on
1 2
the shift *m determined by the amino twist angle.5
The substituents X in 14DMX and 14ANX and the solvent
polarity exert their inÑuence on the IC reaction by modifying
References
the energy gap *E(S ,S ) and hence the height of the IC acti-
1
2
3
S. I. Druzhinin and B. M. Uzhinov, T heor. Exp. Chem. Engl.
T ransl., 1982, 18, 565.
1 2
vation energy E (Fig. 11). The E barrier decreases with
IC
IC
S. R. Meech, D. V. OÏConnor, D. Phillips and A. G. Lee, J. Chem.
Soc., Faraday T rans. 2, 1983, 79, 1563.
increasing electron acceptor character of the X substituent,
with the lowest value for the cyano-substituted naphthyl-
K. A. Zachariasse, M. Grobys, Th. von der Haar, A. Hebecker,
Yu. V. IlÏichev, O. Morawski, I. Ruckert and W. Kuhnle, J.
Photochem. Photobiol., A, 1997, 105, 373.
K. Suzuki, H. Tanabe, S. Tobita and H. Shizuka, J. Phys. Chem.
A, 1997, 101, 4496.
I. Ruckert, A. Demeter, O. Morawski, W. Kuhnle, E. Tauer and
K. A. Zachariasse, J. Phys. Chem. A, 1999, 103, 1958.
E. Lippert, W. Luder, F. Moll, H. Nagele, H. Boos, H. Prigge and
I. Siebold-Blankenstein, Angew. Chem., 1961, 73, 695.
K. A. Zachariasse, Th. von der Haar, U. Leinhos and W. Kuhnle,
Pure Appl. Chem., 1993, 65, 1745.
W. Schuddeboom, S. A. Jonker, J. M. Warman, U. Leinhos, W.
Kuhnle and K. A. Zachariasse, J. Phys. Chem., 1992, 96, 10809.
J. Hicks, M. Vandersall, Z. Babarogic and K. B. Eisenthal, Chem.
Phys. L ett., 1985, 116, 18.
amines. With increasing solvent polarity, *E(S ,S ) becomes
1 2
larger.3,5 This leads to larger E barriers and hence smaller
IC
IC rate constants.
4
5
6
7
8
9
It is assumed that the IC reaction pathway passes through a
conical intersection,56 which allows the system to proceed to
the ground state S . The conical intersection comes into exis-
0
tence by the horizontal shift (*m) of the S and S potential
1
0
energy surfaces (Fig. 11), this shift being proportional to the
di†erence in amino twist angle h of the 1-naphthylamines in
the S and S states.
1
0
Conclusion
10 K. A. Zachariasse, M. Grobys, Th. von der Haar, A. Hebecker,
Yu. V. IlÏichev, Y.-B. Jiang, O. Morawski and W. Kuhnle, J.
Photochem. Photobiol., A, 1996, 102, 59.
For the 4-substituted 1-naphthylamines 14DMX and 14ANX,
a thermally activated internal conversion reaction takes place
in hexane, diethyl ether and acetonitrile. The efficiency of this
IC reaction depends on the nature of the substituent X,
decreasing in the order CN, Cl, H, CH , OCH , in which the
character of the substituent changes from electron acceptor to
electron donor. For every 14DMX and 14ANX molecule, the
IC process is less efficient in diethyl ether and acetonitrile than
in hexane, slowing down when the solvent polarity becomes
larger. The inÑuence of the substituent X and of the solvent
11 C. F. Lane, Synthesis, 1975, 135..
12 A. A. Ayuk, W. Rettig and E. Lippert, Ber. Bunsen-Ges. Phys.
Chem., 1981, 85, 553.
13 R. F. Borch and A. I. Hassid, J. Org. Chem., 1972, 37, 1673.
14 J. N. Demas and G. A. Crosby, J. Phys. Chem., 1971, 75, 991.
15 K. A. Zachariasse, G. Duveneck and R. Busse, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1984, 106, 1045.
16 U. Leinhos, W. Kuhnle and K. A. Zachariasse, J. Phys. Chem.,
1991, 95, 2013.
17 G. Striker, in Deconvolution and Reconvolution of Analytical
Signals, ed. M. Bouchy, University Press, Nancy, 1982, p. 329.
18 K. A. Zachariasse, W. Kuhnle, U. Leinhos, P. Reynders and G.
Striker, J. Phys. Chem., 1991, 95, 5476.
19 I. Carmichael, W. P. Helman and G. L. Hug, J. Phys. Chem. Ref.
Data, 1987, 16, 239.
20 L. Biczok, T. Berces and H. Inoue, J. Phys. Chem. A, 1999, 103,
3837.
3
3
polarity is mainly caused by the IC activation energy E
which increases when X changes in the series from CN to
,
IC
OCH and with increasing solvent polarity. The IC rate con-
3
stants k are larger for 14DMX than for 14ANX in each of
IC
the three solvents, likewise owing to larger activation energies
for the latter group of molecules. This di†erence in IC effi-
ciency is attributed to the larger ground state twist angle h of
990
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2000, 2, 981È991