X. Li et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 62 (2013) 605e613
611
(103 g, 898.5 mmol, corrected for purity), followed by THF (615 mL).
The solution was cooled to 0e1 ꢁC with an ice-water bath. A solu-
tion of propiophenone 7 (170 g, 876.3 mmol) in THF (340 mL) was
added in portions over 15 min while keeping the internal temper-
ature <7 ꢁC giving a white/yellow-white slurry. After 15 min the
mixture was warmed to 18 ꢁC and DMF (850 mL) was added via the
addition funnel over 2 min giving a clear yellow/orange solution.
After 15 min, the reaction mixture was cooled to ꢀ70 ꢁC using a dry
completely dried (no weight loss between drying turns), which
gave 2194 g of furan 4 (91% yield, purity>98% as determined by
HPLC). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz)
d: 2.22 (s, 6H), 3.92 (s, 6H), 3.95 (s,
6H), 6.94 (d, 2H, J ¼ 6.9 Hz), 7.24e719 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (CDCl3,
100 MHz) d: 9.82, 55.87, 55.90, 109.14, 111.25, 117.77, 118.36, 125.06,
146.86, 148.00, 148.92. LC/MS (m/z ¼ 368.8).
4.1.5. Terameprocol (2)
ice/acetone bath. With vigorous stirring, a solution of
a
-bromoke-
Terameprocol 2 is anticancer drug candidate currently in clinical
trials. Large quantity of terameprocol 2 may be needed in the
future. We were interested in exploring synthetic process which
would allow us to effectively produce terameprocol 2 at kilograms
per batch since methods reported in the literature [10] was not
scalable in our hand. By using different catalysts, solvents, reaction
temperatures, reaction times, and hydrogen pressures, we were
able to develop three optimized procedures (methods A, B and C),
which were scalable, reproducible and could produce terameprocol
2 at relatively large quantity.
tone 8 (240 g, 876.3 mmol) in 2:1 THF-DMF (510 mL) was added in
portions over 25 min while maintaining an internal temperature
between ꢀ60 ꢁC and ꢀ55 ꢁC. After an additional 15 min at ꢀ60 ꢁC,
the reaction was complete as determined by LC/MS analysis. The
reaction was quenched at ꢀ60 ꢁC with water (900 mL) containing
70 mL 1 M HCl and the reaction was warmed to 18e20 ꢁC over 1 h.
The bulk of THF was removed in vacuo (1415 mL solvent removed)
and the resulting mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2 (1.5 L). The
organic layer was separated and the aqueous layer (pH 2e3) was
back extracted twice with CH2Cl2 (2 ꢃ 400 mL). The combined
CH2Cl2 was washed with water (425 mL). The bulk of the CH2Cl2
(1550 mL) was removed in vacuo to give crude product 3, which was
further purified from methanol to give the expected product 321.7 g
(95% yield, purity>98% as determined by HPLC). 1H NMR (CDCl3,
4.1.5.1. Method A. To an 8 L hydrogenator, equipped with an over-
head magnetic stir drive and heating mantle, were charged a finely
divided mixture of 78.65 g (32.6 mmol) 10% Pd-C catalyst (10R39,
55.9% wet) catalyst (available through JohnsoneMatthey Inc) and
11.55 g (5.4 mmol) Degussa E101 10% Pd/C (50% wet) catalyst
(available from SigmaeAldrich Inc.). To the vessel was charged n-
propyl acetate (3.74 L) and the vessel was pressurized to 800 psi
with H2. The mixture was stirred at the maximum stir speed at
room temperature for 30 min to 1 h. The vessel was vented to at-
mospheric pressure, the lid opened under N2 atmosphere and
slurry of furan compound 4 (400 g, 108 mmol) in n-propyl acetate
(1.86 L was charged to the vessel). The mixture was heated to
100 ꢁC under 1000 psi H2 pressure at maximum stir speed. The
reaction was monitored by HPLC until all furan 4 is consumed and
less than 2% THF intermediate 9 is present. The reaction mixture
was cooled to 20e25 ꢁC and the vessel was vented to atmospheric
pressure. The reactor lid was removed and the reaction mixture was
sparged with N2. Immediately, the reaction mixture was filtered
through a bed of CeliteÒ 545 filter material (800 g) and the CeliteÒ
filter material cake was washed with n-propyl acetate (4 L). The
combined n-propyl acetate filtrate was washed with water (2 L),
5 wt % aqueous potassium carbonate solution (2 L) and brine (2 L).
The organic stream was dried over Na2SO4 (400 g), filtered, and
then solvent was removed in vacuo at 50 ꢁC. The resulting residue
was diluted with heptane (2 L) and solvent was removed in vacuo at
50 ꢁC. The resulting solids were suspended in 15% (v/v) IPAe
heptane (1.6 L), heated to 50e60 ꢁC and cooled to 20 ꢁC over 1 h.
The slurry was agitated for 1 h at 20 ꢁC and vacuum filter (up to
18 h). The crude solids were transferred (289 g) to a 2 L vessel,
equipped with an overhead stir drive, condenser and heating
mantle, and 15% (v/v) IPAeheptane (578 mL) was added. The
mixture was heated to 65 ꢁC until the slurry thinned (about 5 min)
and the mixture was allowed to cool to 15 ꢁC over 3.5 h. The slurry
was vacuumed and the cake was washed with chilled (5e10 ꢁC) 15%
(v/v) IPAeheptane (300 mL). The solids were dried in vacuo to
constant weight (217 g, 55.9% yield, purity > 99% as determined by
400 MHz)
d
: 1.31 (d, J ¼ 7.1 Hz, 2CH3, 6H), 3.55 (m, 2H), 3.85 (s,
4OCH3, 12H), 6.98 (d, 2H, J ¼ 6.9 Hz), 7.24e719 (m, 4H). 13C NMR
(CDCl3, 100 MHz) d: 11.82, 42.11, 58.87, 110.14,110.23, 131.33, 149.44,
150.11, 198.22. LC/MS (m/z ¼ 386.4).
4.1.4. 2,5-Bis(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-3,4-dimethylfuran (4)
To a dry 50 L, 3-necked round bottom flask (equipped with
a mechanical stirrer, addition funnel, thermocouple and N2 inlet
and outlet) was added solid 97% t-BuOK (774.8 g, 6.56 mol, cor-
rected for purity), followed by THF (4.60 L). The solution was cooled
to 0e4 ꢁC with an ice-water bath. A solution of propiophenone 7
(1.243 kg, 6.40 mol) in THF (2.50 L) was added in portions over
60 min while keeping the internal temperature <7 ꢁC giving
a white/yellow-white slurry. After 15 min the mixture was warmed
to 10 ꢁC and DMF (6.20 L) was added via the addition funnel over
15 min giving a clear yellow/orange solution. After 15 min, the re-
action mixture was cooled to ꢀ70 ꢁC using a dry ice/acetone bath.
With vigorous stirring, a solution of
a-bromoketone 8 (1.748 kg,
6.4 mol) in a solution of 2:1 THF-DMF (THF: 2.5 L; DMF: 1.25 L) was
added in portions over 90 min while maintaining an internal
temperature between ꢀ60 ꢁC and ꢀ55 ꢁC. After an additional
15 min at ꢀ60 ꢁC, the reaction was complete as determined by LC/
MS analysis. The reaction was quenched at ꢀ60 ꢁC with water
(8.60 L) containing 1M HCl 510 mL and the reaction were warmed
to 18e20 ꢁC over 1 h. The bulk of THF was removed in vacuo
(9000 mL solvent removed) and the resulting mixture was extrac-
ted with CH2Cl2 (5.6 L). The organic layer was separated and the
aqueous layer (pH 2e3) was back extracted twice with CH2Cl2
(2 ꢃ 7.6 L). The combined CH2Cl2 was washed with water (3.5 L).
The bulk of the CH2Cl2 (8000 mL) was removed in vacuo and was
transferred to a 3-neck round bottom flask equipped with me-
chanical stirrer, addition funnel and condenser. The resulting so-
lution was heated to reflux (44 ꢁC) and a solution of 3% HCl in
MeOH (prepared by adding 460 mL acetyl chloride to 8000 mL
methanol) was added in a steady stream over a period of 90 min.
Solids precipitated within 15e20 min. Reflux was continued (54 ꢁC)
for 5 h and the mixture was cooled to 0e2 ꢁC over 2 h. The solids
were vacuum filtered and the filter cake was washed with MeOH
(2920 mL), then heptane (2920 mL). The white solids were dried in
a vacuum oven (20 h, 50 ꢁC), then the solid was stirred and crushed
to break down larger pieces. The solid was dried in a vacuum oven
(20 h, 50 ꢁC). The procedure was repeated 3 times till solid was
GC). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz)
d
: 0.85 (d, 6H, J ¼ 6.6 Hz), 1.83e1.92
(m, 2H), 2.30 (dd, 2H, J ¼ 9.3, 13.5 Hz), 2.76 (dd, 2H, J ¼ 5.0, 13.5 Hz),
3.85 (s, 6H), 3.86 (s, 6H), 6.65 (d, 2H, J ¼ 2.0 Hz), 6.70 (dd, 2H, J ¼ 8.0,
2.0 Hz), 6.79 (d, 2H, J ¼ 8.0 Hz). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz)
d: 16.19,
38.80, 39.14, 55.76, 55.86, 110.99, 112.22, 120.90, 134.42, 147.02,
148.68. LCMS (m/z ¼ 358.9).
4.1.5.2. Method B. Furan compound 4 (400 g) was hydrogenated in
n-propyl acetate using 10R39 catalyst (2.5 mol%) and E101 NE/W
GG (0.5 mol%) at 100 ꢁC. After pre-reducing the catalyst mixture at