D. Panov et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 691 (2006) 4076–4079
4079
At the same time all the alkoxides under consideration,
highly branched ones included, appear to complex almost
completely with the Grignard reagent thus being better
donors than the Cl-atom in the bridge position (cf struc-
tures I and II) and consequently should always accelerate
the reaction in comparison with the uncomplexed Grignard
reagent instead of suppressing the reaction rate. However,
in Table 2 the ordinary butylmagnesium chloride takes an
intermediate position between the alkoxy complexes as to
the reaction rate or to the reduction/addition ratio. It fol-
lows inevitably that the course of the reaction cannot be
determined exclusively by donating properties of the alkox-
ide ligands. On the contrary, their steric effects must be lar-
gely superimposed upon the reactivity.
to reactions resulting eventually in a decrease in the reac-
tion rate. As the Grignard addition reaction with ketones
is more susceptible to steric effects than the reduction, in
case of carbonyl compounds the ratio Red/Add increases
with an increase in steric requirements of alkoxides.
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by the Dow Corn-
ing Corporation (Midland, USA) and the Estonian Science
Foundation (Grant No. 6512).
References
Obviously, branched alkyl groups of alkoxy ligands hin-
der considerably the transition states from gaining favor-
able conformations, the addition reaction with ketones
being more susceptible to the steric effects.
[1] A. Tuulmets, M. H o˜ rak, T. K o˜ opere, J. Ruotsi, Org. React. (USSR)
1
9 (1982) 102–119;
A. Tuulmets, M. H o˜ rak, T. K o˜ opere, J. Ruotsi, Chem. Abstr. 99
1983) 53836.
(
[2] A. Tuulmets, Reakts. Sposobn. Org. Soed. 1 (1964) 196–209;
From our experimental data we can conclude that the
rate enhancements by methoxy- and ethoxygroups are
mainly due to the donating effects while in case of the
branched alkyl groups the steric effects are overwhelming
and suppress the rates of all Grignard reactions, the cou-
pling reactions of silanes included.
A. Tuulmets, Chem. Abstr. 61 (1964) 13154.
[3] R. D’Hollander, M. Anteunis, Bull. Soc. Chim. Belges 74 (1965) 71–
9.
4] E.C. Ashby, J. Laemmle, H.M. Neumann, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 94
1972) 5421–5434.
8
[
[
(
5] J. Miller, G. Gregoriou, H.S. Mosher, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 83 (1961)
3955–3960.
In conclusion, we have revisited an old question of the
impact of reaction products on the Grignard reaction.
Although addressed in numerous works [1–9], the way
how the product magnesiumalkoxydes interfere in the reac-
tion was not entirely clear, not to mention the controversial
influence of the products on the reaction rates and addition
to reduction ratios.
Application of kinetic measurements to reactions of
Grignard-alkoxide complexes taken in a great excess with
silanes and with a ketone provided an insight into the prob-
lem valid for all Grignard reactions.
We were able to show that alkoxide-type products of
Grignard reactions complex tightly with Grignard reagents
and enhance in this way the nucleophilicity and the reactiv-
ity of the reagent. However, alkoxides branched at a-C
atom exert additionally an unfavourable steric hindrance
[6] D.O. Cowan, H.S. Mosher, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 27 (1962) 1–10.
[
[
7] H.O. House, D.D. Traficante, J. Org. Chem. 28 (1963) 355–360.
8] M. Anteunis, R. D’Hollander, Tetrahedron Lett. (1963) 1275–
1
278.
[9] M. Chastrette, R. Amouroux, Compt. Rend. Ser. C. 270 (1970) 92–
95.
[10] J. Laemmle, E.C. Ashby, H.M. Neumann, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 93
1971) 5120–5127.
(
[
[
11] E.C. Ashby, Pure Appl. Chem. 52 (1980) 545–569.
12] A. Tuulmets, D. Panov, M. Sassian, Tetrahedron Lett. 44 (2003)
3
943–3945.
[13] A. Tuulmets, B.T. Nguyen, D. Panov, M. Sassian, J. Jarv, J. Org.
¨
Chem. 68 (2003) 9933–9937.
14] A. Tuulmets, B.T. Nguyen, D. Panov, J. Org. Chem. 69 (2004) 5071–
[
5
076.
[
[
15] E.C. Ashby, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. (1972) 2133–2142.
16] F. Walker, E.C. Ashby, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 91 (1969) 3845–3850.
[17] C. Reichardt, Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry,
third ed., Wiley–VCH, Weinheim, 2003, p. 102.