seemed particularly attractive for it had the potential to set
in a straightforward manner the C2-C3-C4 relationship.
The Diels-Alder reaction of a dehydroproline I with an
electron-rich diene II (e.g., Danishefsky’s or Rawal’s) might
lead to enone III (Figure 2). This product could then, in
amples in which the trisubstituted olefin is incorporated in
a five-membered ring: none without activation, only a few
with formyl activation,8 and fewer yet with carboxy, car-
balkoxy,9 or keto activation.10 These limited examples,
furthermore, require in general heating and/or Lewis acid
catalysis, conditions most likely inappropriate in the present
context due to facile racemization of chiral (Vinylogous)
malonate deriVatiVes.
Triflate 411 was prepared to serve as a direct precursor of
dehydroproline derivatives I (Scheme 1). trans-4-Hydroxy-
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Dehydroprolines
Figure 2. Overview of the projected approach to (-)-kainic acid.
principle, rapidly be converted into kainic acid through a
sequence that would include conjugate addition of a methyl
group and enolate trapping to produce IV, followed by
oxidative cleavage, double bond formation, and hydrolysis.
It was obvious that success of the plan would primarily
hinge on whether the unactivated disubstituted (R ) H) or
activated trisubstituted (R ) CHO, CO2H, CO2Me) olefin I
could be made to react satisfactorily with diene II. It was
feared, however, and with some foundation, that the disub-
stituted olefin, even if reactive, would not undergo cycload-
dition regioselectively as desired and, moreover, that an
activated trisubstituted olefin would prove nevertheless
resistant under normal conditions. The literature contains
relatively few examples of trisubstituted olefins as reactive
Diels-Alder partners,7-10 and particularly scarce are ex-
L-proline was converted in 93% yield into the N-Boc methyl
ester derivative 3, which was smoothly oxidized to the
corresponding ketone11 in 85% yield with PCC in the
presence of molecular sieves. This procedure was found to
be considerably more efficient and reliable than the others
tested (TPAP/NMO, Swern, and Dess-Martin). Triflate 4
was then obtained regioselectively and in high yield from
this ketone with NaHMDS-PhNTf2.
Reduction of 4 with triethylsilane in the presence of Pd-
(PPh3)4 led to 3,4-dehydroproline 5 in 85% yield. Unfortu-
nately, however, none of many Diels-Alder reactions
attempted with 5 and various diene partners (electron rich
and electron poor) was found to be even marginally produc-
tive, including those heated in a sealed tube or subjected to
high pressure. Since an acceptable means of converting
triflate 4 into the corresponding acrolein derivative could
not be found,12 attention was directed toward the preparation
of diester 7. Pleasingly, Pd-catalyzed methoxycarbonylation
of 4 afforded the desired acrylate derivative 7 in 60% yield
(7) Six-membered ring dienophiles: (a) Danishefsky, S.; Kitahara, T.;
Yan, C. F.; Morris, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 6996-7000. (b)
Jankowski, C. K.; LeClair, G.; Be´langer, J. M. R.; Pare´, J. R. J.;
VanCalsteren, M.-R. Can. J. Chem. 2001, 79, 1906-1909. (c) Boger, D.
L.; Patel, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 683-686. (d) Grieco, P. A.; Lis,
R.; Zelle, R. E.; Finn, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 5908-5919. (e)
O’Connor, P. D.; Mander, L. N.; McLachlan, M. M. W. Org. Lett. 2004,
6, 703-706. Acyclic dienophiles: (f) Paczkowski, R.; Maichle-Mossmer,
C.; Maier, M. E. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 3967-3969.
(8) Five-membered carbocycles with cyclopentadiene: (a) Ishihara, K.;
Yamamoto, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 1561-1562. (b) Ishihara, K.;
Kurihara, H.; Matsumoto, M.; Yamamoto, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120,
6920-6930. (c) Ryu, D. H.; Lee, T. W.; Corey, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002, 124, 9992-9993. (d) Sprott, K. T.; Corey, E. J. Org. Lett. 2003, 5,
2465-2467. (e) Davies, H. M. L.; Dai, X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
2692-2693. With Rawal’s diene: (f) Huang, Y.; Iwama, T.; Rawal, V. H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7843-7844. Furanoside-type dienophiles:
(g) Rehnberg, N.; Sundin, A.; Magnusson, G. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55,
5477-5483. (h) Ponten, F.; Magnusson, G. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 7978-
7983. Indole dienophiles: (i) Chataigner, I.; Hess, E.; Toupet, L.; Piettre,
S. R. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 515-518. (j) Chretien, A.; Chataigner, I.; L’Helias,
N.; Piettre, S. R. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 7990-8002.
(10) (a) Reddy, T. J.; Rawal, V. H. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2711-2712. (b)
Jung, M. E.; Davidov, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2002, 41, 4125-
4128. (c) Jung, M. E.; Ho, D.; Chu, H. V. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 1649-1651.
(11) (a) Oba, M.; Terauchi, T.; Miyakawa, A.; Kamo, H.; Nishiyama,
K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 1595-1598. (b) Honda, T.; Takahashi, R.;
Namiki, H. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 499-504.
(9) (a) Strunz, G. M.; Bethell, R.; Dumas, M. T.; Boyonoski, N. Can. J.
Chem. 1997, 75, 742-753. (b) Martin, C.; Mailliet, P.; Maddaluno, J. J.
Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 3797-3805. (c) Pichon, N.; Harrison-Marchand, A.;
Mailliet, P.; Maddaluno, J. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 7220-7227.
(12) Surprisingly, no aldehyde was obtained on treatment of triflate 4
with Pd(0) and tributyltin hydride in DMF under carbon monoxide (only
the reduced product 5 was formed). Other approaches to the conjugated
aldehyde were low yielding and/or too long.
5666
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 24, 2006