A. Muñoz-Ramírez, et al.
Phytochemistry 174 (2020) 112359
7
2
C, CH2); 27.5 (s, CH2); 27.3 (s, CH2); 22.7 (s, CH2); 21.1 (s, CH3);
0.7 (s, CH3); 14.3 (s, CH3).
4.8. Evaluation of radical-trapping activity using ABTS
To prepare the reaction, sodium persulfate and ABTS were mixed
with water. The compounds were allowed to react for 16 h and then
were diluted by transferring 150 μL into 15 mL ethanol. Trolox
4
.4.2. 1,2-Diacethyl-3-pentadecylbenzene (4)
Yield 82.4%; solid. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, δ, ppm) δ: 7.18 (d,
H, JH-H = 6.9 Hz, CH); 7.12 (t, 1H, JH-H = 7.6 Hz, CH); 7.04 (d, 1H,
(
0–50 μM) was used for the calibration curve.
1
To measure the samples, 30 μL was added to 2000 μL ABTS reagent.
The solution was allowed to stand for 7 min, and the absorbance was
measured at 754 nm.
JH-H = 8.0 Hz, CH); 2.51 (t, 2H, JH-H = 7.6 Hz, CH2); 2.31 (s, 3H,
CH3); 2.27 (s, 3H, CH3); 1.26 (m, 26H, CH2); 0.88 (t, 3H, JH-
H = 6,4 Hz, CH3). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, δ, ppm) δ: 168.7 (s,
C=O); 168.6 (s, C=O); 142.8 (s, C); 140.9 (s, C); 137.1 (s, C); 127.6 (s,
CH); 126.5 (s, CH); 121.2 (s, CH); 32.3 (s, CH2); 30.5–29.7 (m, 12C,
CH2); 23.1 (s, CH2); 21.1 (s, CH3); 20.7 (s, CH3); 14.5 (s, CH3).
4.9. Evaluation of antioxidant activity by FRAP
To prepare the FRAP solution, 25 mL of 300 mM acetate buffer (pH
4
.5. Determination of the inhibitory activity of (Z)-3-(pentadec-10′-enyl)-
3.6) was mixed with 2.5 mL of 20 mM ferric chloride hexahydrate in
distilled water, followed by the addition of 2.5 mL of 2,4,6-tris-(2-
pyridyl)-s-triazine (TPTZ) 10 mM in 40 mM HCl. The samples were
dissolved in methanol, and 1500 μl freshly prepared FRAP solution was
added to each cuvette with 50 μL of the samples dissolved in methanol.
The solution was allowed to stand for 4 min, and absorbance was
measured at 593 nm using a PerkinElmer Lambda 25 UV/Vis spectro-
photometer at room temperature.
catechol (1), 3-pentadecylcatechol (2), (Z)-1,2-diacetyl-3-(pentadec-10′-
enyl)-benzene (3) and 1,2-diacetyl-3-pentadecylbenzene (4) against
soybean 15-lipoxigenase (15-sLOX)
Analysis of 15-sLOX activity (Cayman Chemical Item Nº. 60,712)
−1
−1
was performed at 234 nm (ε = 25.000 M cm ) and was produced
due to the formation of the conjugated diene, which was measured
using a Perkin spectrophotometer-Elmer Lambda 25 UV/Vis. All reac-
tions were carried out with a final volume of 2 mL with constant agi-
tation at room temperature. For this reaction, a 0.1 M HEPES buffer was
prepared at pH 7.4 containing Triton X-100 and 10 μM of the linoleic
acid substrate. IC50 values were determined using the GraphPad Prism
Demo v 8.2.1.
4
.10. Molecular modeling
format *.pdb, code 3O8Y (resolution of 2.30 Å) containing an iron atom
in the active site with Fe (III) oxidation state. From this file, the water
molecules present in the macromolecule were eliminated. Using the
AutoDockTools program, hydrogen atoms were added to the protein.
Once these modifications were made, we proceeded to create a file with
extension *. pdbqt, which contained the information generated from
the partial charges and the types of atoms belonging to the macro-
molecule. Ligands were constructed using the GaussView 3.07 program,
and geometric optimization was subsequently carried out using the
Gaussian 09 program. For this optimization, the semi-empirical method
4.6. Determination of the inhibitory activity of (Z)-3- (pentadec-10′-enyl)-
catechol (1), 3-pentadecylcatechol (2), (Z)-1,2-diacetyl-3- (pentadec-10′-
enyl)-benzene (3) and 1,2-diacetyl-3-pentadecylbenzene (1) against human
5-lipoxygenase (5-hLOX) using enzyme kinetics assays
This fluorescence-based assay is performed using microplates. The
enzyme (Cayman Chemical Item No. 60402) was diluted (1:500) in the
assay buffer (HEPES 50 mM, EDTA 2 mM, ATP 10 μM and CaCl
0 μM at pH 7,5) and mixed with 10 μM of H2DCFDA dye. The reaction
mixture was incubated for 15 min in the assay plate. Subsequently,
80 μL of assay buffer was added per well, and 10 μL of inhibitor was
2
1
(
AM1) was initially used followed by the B3LYP method (6-31G*).
Once the structure was optimized and we had determined the par-
2
tial charges derived from electrostatic potential (ESP), molecular cou-
pling analysis was carried out using the Autodock 4 computer program
and the Genetic-Lamarckian algorithm implemented by AutoDock with
a size of grid of 100 points and the box centered on the nonhemic iron
positioned in the catalytic site. Finally, a total of 100 runs were ob-
tained.
added to a final concentration of 10 μM; this reaction mixture was in-
cubated for 30 min. The reaction was started by the addition of a sui-
table concentration of arachidonic acid (0.5 μM), and fluorescence was
read in a multimode detector Synergy™ HT Multi-Mode Microplate
Reader (Biotek) at 480 nm excitation/520 nm emission after a reaction
that had proceeded for 1 h at room temperature for determinate the %I
values. The IC50 values were obtained by the same procedure describe
above but with different inhibitor concentrations (0–10 μM). Finally,
the kinetic assay was performed using different concentrations of sub-
strate (0, 0.5, 1.5 and 3 μM) to determine the inhibitory mechanism and
identify the best inhibitor under the experimental conditions described
previously. All data were collected in duplicate, and the assays were
performed on different days to ensure reproducibility of the methods
used, the GraphPad Prism Demo v 8.2.1 was used for obtaining the
corresponding IC50 (hyperbolic saturation curve) and kinetics para-
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial
interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influ-
ence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgment
meters as (K
.7. Evaluation of radical-trapping activity using DPPH
The assay for DPPH uptake capacity was performed in a 96-well
microplate using 20 μL of 2.5 mg/mL compounds in methanol, which
were added to 100 μL of 0.1 mM DPPH in methanol. The plate was
incubated in the dark for 30 min at room temperature. The absorbance
m m i
, V ) by nonlinear regression and K by double-reciprocal.
USA1799 – Vridei 021941 MC-PAP Universidad de Santiago de
Chile. Postgraduate studies financed by CONICYT: CONICYT-PCHA/
Doctorado Nacional/2014–21140089. Powered@NLHPC: This re-
search/thesis was partially supported by the supercomputing infra-
structure of the NLHPC (ECM-02).
4
Appendix A. Supplementary data
(
A) of each reaction mixture was measured at 515 nm and compared
with a blank methanol control using ascorbic acid as the calibration
curve.
6