132
A. A. Taherpour and K. Kheradmand
Vol 46
Methyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4-carboxylate (2). White crystals,
mp 127–128ꢁC (lit. 126–128ꢁC) [27–30]. FTIR (KBr): 3150
(NAH), 3138, 3005, 2937, 1708 (C¼¼O), 1660, 1538, 1480,
(DMSO): 8.56 (s, 1H), 3.83 (s, 3H). 13C NMR: 161, 138.8,
130.1, and 51.83. MS: m/z (relative intensity), Mw ¼ 127; 127
(Mþ, 8.8), 95 (70.6), 96 (100), 78 (17.6), and 63 (18.5).
C4H5N3O2, CHN-analysis; calculated: C (37.80%), H (3.97%),
and N (33.06%), experiment: C (37.73%), H (3.95%), and N
(33.01%).
azide II (Me3Si-N3) on the alkylpropyolates (1,3) and
DMAD (5) in high yields.
1432, 1352, 1212, 1116, 1023, 843, 779 cmꢂ1 1H NMR dH
.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The results show that the trimethylsilyl (Me3Si-) was
removed at the final simple alkyl 1,2,3-triazole-4-car-
boxylate (2, 4, and 6) products. No details are given
about the by-products and only the final products are
considered.
The 13C NMR results show 4, 5, and 3 C-atom types
for 2, 4, and 6, respectively. See results in the Experi-
mental section. The [Mþ] for 2, 4, and 6, were 127, 141,
and 185, respectively. The percentages of C, H, and N
are explained in the Experimental section. In accordance
with the results that were shown in the Experimental sec-
tion the MS (and CI) spectrums and CHN analysis dem-
onstrated that the trimethylsilyl (Me3Si-) was removed
from the products during the synthesis process.
Ethyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4-carboxylate (4). White crystals,
mp 102–104ꢁC (lit. 102–104ꢁC) [27–30]. FTIR (KBr): 3224
(NAH), 3167, 2986, 1723 (C¼¼O), 1661, 1533, 1466, 1375,
1332, 1238, 1202, 1114, 1029, 843, 780 cmꢂ1 1H NMR dH
.
(DMSO): 8.46 (s, 1H), 4.27–4.35 (q, 2H, 7.0 Hz) and 1.27–
1.32 (t, 3H, 7.0 Hz). 13C NMR: 160.4, 138.2, 131.4, 60.4, and
14.0. MS: m/z (relative intensity); Mw ¼ 141; CI ¼ 141
(6.82), 113 (47.73), 95 (100), 71, 68 (78.5), and 44 (34.1).
C5H7N3O2, CHN-analysis; calculated: C (42.55%), H (5.00%),
and N (29.77%), experiment: C (42.50%), H (5.03%), and N
(29.74%).
Dimethyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4,5-carboxylate
(6). White
crystals, mp 116–118ꢁC (lit. 117–118ꢁC) [27–30]. FTIR
(KBr): 3239 (NAH), 3100, 2996, 2861, 1742 (C¼¼O), 1658,
1519, 1437, 1389, 1304, 1228, 1190, 1084, 990, 833, 767
EXPERIMENTAL
1
cmꢂ1. H NMR dH (DMSO): 3.87 (s). 13C NMR: 160.2, 131.0,
The simple imides that were synthesized (2, 4, and 6), are
known compounds and those physical data, infrared and 1H
NMR spectra were essentially identical with those of authentic
samples [27–30]. The FTIR spectra was recorded as KBr pel-
and 52.4. MS: m/z (relative intensity); Mw ¼ 185; 187 (M2Hþ,
38.2), 154 (67.65), 124 (58.8), 93, 58, and 43 (100).
C6H7N3O4, CHN-analysis; calculated: C (38.92%), H (3.81%),
and N (22.70%), experiment: C (38.98%), H (3.85%), and N
(22.66%).
1
lets on a Shimadzu FTIR 8000 spectrometer. H NMR spectra
was determined on a 300 MHz Bru¨ker spectrometer. The sol-
vent for NMR recording was DMSO. It should be noted that a
limited amount of compounds is required for this experiment.
Therefore some small quality of vapor is evolved during irradi-
ation. The power generated by the microwave oven was mea-
sured before the experiments by the method described in the
literature [31].
Caution: For safety reasons all of the experiments should be
performed in an efficient hood in order to avoid contact with
vapors, as some quantity of substances can be vaporized
during irradiation.
The simple one-pot microwave assisted solvent free synthe-
sis of useful alkyl 1,2,3-triazole-4-carboxylate derivatives (2,
4, and 6) by Huisgen 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reactions with
trimethylsilyl azide (Me3Si-N3) on the alkylpropyolates 1,3
and DMAD (5), in high yields is described. Comparison of
this procedure with the other methods confirms the facility and
rapidity of this method for synthesis of the alkyl 1,2,3-triazole-
4-carboxylate derivatives.
Acknowledgments. The authors gratefully acknowledge Profes-
sor Curt Wentrup and the colleagues in Chemistry Department of
The University of Queensland-Australia, for their useful sugges-
tions. The authors are grateful to the Research Council of Science
and Research Campus and Arak branch of I.A. University for
supporting this study.
Typical experimental procedure for synthesis of methyl-
1H-1,2,3-triazole-4-carboxylate (2). A mixture of methyl-pro-
piolate 1 (1 g, 1 mL, 0.012 mol) and trimethylsilyl azide
(Me3Si-N3) II (1.2 g, 1.5 mL, 0.012 mol) was made in a dried
heavy wall Pyrex tube. The tube was sealed and then exposed
to microwave oven. After 10 min irradiation at 60 W power,
the mixture was cooled to room temperature. The residue of
compounds was evaporated under air and reduced pressure. An
off-white solid was afforded. The product 2 can be re-crystal-
lized from chloroform þ acetone and petroleum ether. These
stages afforded 0.049 g product (workup yield 82% and GC
yield ꢃ100%).
REFERENCES AND NOTES
[1] Stadler, A.; Kappe, C. O. In Microwave-Assisted Organic Syn-
thesis; Lidstom, P., Tierney, J. P., Eds.; Blackwell: Oxford, 2005, 177.
[2] Kappe, C. O. Angew Chem Int Ed 2004, 43, 6250.
[3] Kappe, C. O.; Stadler, A. Microwaves in Organic and
Medicinal Chemistry; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Wein-
heim, 2005.
The amounts of ethylpropiolate 3 and trimethylsilyl azide II
(Me3Si-N3) for synthesis ethyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4-carboxylate
(4) are: 0.965 g (1 mL, 0.010 mol) and 1.1 g (1.3 mL, 0.01
mol), respectively. The yield of 4 was 0.054 g, 83%. The
amounts of DMAD 5 and Me3Si-N3 (II) for synthesis di-
methyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4,5-carboxylate (6): are: 1.157 g (1
mL, 0.0082 mol) and 1 g (1.2 mL, 0.009 mol), respectively.
The yield of 4 was 0.072 g, 77%.
[4] Zbancioc, N. G.; Caprosu, D. M.; Moldoveanu, C. C.; Ionel,
I. I. Arkivoc 2005, 10, 189.
[5] Katritzky, A. R.; Singh, S. K. Arkivoc 2003, 13, 68.
[6] Ling, M. J.; Sun, C. M. Synlett 2004, 4, 663.
[7] Dai, W.-M.; Guo, D.-S.; Sun, L.-P.; Huang, X.-H. Org Lett
2003, 5, 2919.
Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry
DOI 10.1002/jhet