couplings with an aryl halide when amines and boronic esters
are present in the reaction milieu.
After an initial attempt of the one-pot reaction sequence
failed, we explored aminations of the purified borylation
product of 3-chlorotoluene. To our delight, selective C-N
coupling was found by using anhydrous K PO as the base
3 4
according to eq 1. Returning to the one-pot sequence, we
Cross-couplings of aryl boron reagents or amines with aryl
halides constitute two of the most important reactions for
aryl halides. These reactions are typically facilitated by Pd
catalysts in the presence of stoichiometric quantities of base.
Given the similar reaction conditions for C-C and C-N
couplings, attempted catalytic amination of the halogenated
arylboronate ester in Scheme 1 could produce an arylamine
Scheme 1. Possible Outcomes for a One-Pot Borylation/
examined the effects of the Ir and Pd precatalysts, base, and
solvent on yields for the “one-pot” sequence in Scheme 2.
The results are tabulated in Table 1.
Entries 1-4 examine the effects of the Ir source and the
Ir ligand. While room temperature borylations are prohibi-
tively slow for 3-chlorotoluene, the borylations could be
carried out at 80 °C when the Ir ligand was 4,4′-di-tert-butyl-
2
,2′-bipyridyl (dtbpy). The best yields of the borylated
arylamine were obtained when borylations were carried out
with the (Ind)Ir(COD)/1,2-bis(dimethylphosphino)ethane
(dmpe) Ir precatalyst/ligand formulation. In all cases, conver-
sion of 3-chlorotoluene to the intermediate boronate ester
was complete. Hence, the variations in yields for entries 1-4
likely arise from the efficiencies of the amination step.
Entries 1 and 5-8 illustrate the effects of the base on the
if C-N coupling is favored, polyaromatic products if C-C
coupling dominates, or a mixture of these products if C-N
and C-C formation is competitive.
3 4 2 3
amination step. K PO and Cs CO are both effective,
t
t
whereas NaO Bu and KO Bu gave very low yields of the
amino boronate ester. Entry 5 shows the deleterious effects
of water as the amino boronate ester is not detected when
In terms of literature precedent, the prospects for selective
amination according to Scheme 1 were bleak. As well as
we are aware, there are no examples where C-B bonds
survive during Pd-catalyzed amination conditions. Moreover,
there are numerous examples where cross couplings of
arylboronic acids8 and esters9 are accomplished in the
presence of primary and secondary amines. However, our
examinations of one-pot aromatic borylation/C-C coupling
of arenes offered a ray of hope for the amination pathway
in Scheme 1. Specifically, we found that Suzuki-Miyaura
cross-couplings of pinacolate esters of arylboronic acids were
typically slower than reactions of the arylboronic acids
themselves.10 Moreover, the rates of C-C couplings for
pinacol boronate esters further diminish when the reactions
are carried out under anhydrous conditions. Since virtually
all examples of B-C/C-X cross-couplings of substrates with
amine functionality involve boronic acids or boronate esters
in the presence of either water or hydroxide, we reasoned
that the combination of an aprotic base and an anhydrous,
aprotic solvent offered the best chance for realizing C-N
in lieu of C-C coupling.
t
t
K
3
PO
4
2
‚nH O is the base. In contrast to NaO Bu and KO Bu,
where predominance of the intermediate boronate ester
indicates that conversion to the amino boronate is simply
slow, with K
3
PO
4
2
‚nH O the intermediate boronate ester is
completely consumed. Entries 1, 9, and 10 show that the
amination step is moderately sensitive to variations in the
solvent, with DME giving superior results. Last, entries 1
and 11 illustrate the effect of the Pd precatalyst with Pd
2
-
dba being superior to Pd(OAc) , the principle difference
3
2
being significant generation of the deborylated arylamine for
the latter Pd precatalyst.
Armed with the results from Table 1, we examined the
scope of the borylation/amination sequence for various
3-substituted halobenzenes for which borylation at the
5-position predominates. The general conditions in Scheme
3 were used and the results are listed in Table 2.
The isolated yields for the reactions in Table 2, based on
the starting aryl halide, range from 47% to 83% with an
average yield of 64%. This average corresponds to an 80%
yield for the individual steps, assuming that the borylation
and amination yields are identical. When the pure aryl
boronate ester derived from borylation of 3-chlorotolene was
isolated and subsequently aminated with aniline, the product
in entry 1 was isolated in 60% overall yield based on
3-chlorotoluene, compared to the 75% yield obtained for the
one-pot reaction. Thus, higher isolated yields are realized in
the one-pot tandem reactions where isolation and purification
(8) For selected examples, see: (a) Miura, Y.; Oka, H.; Momoki, M.
Synthesis 1995, 11, 1419-1422. (b) Miura, Y.; Mamoki, M.; Nakatsuji,
M. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 1555-1565. (c) Miura, Y.; Nishi, T.; Teki, Y.
J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 10158-10161. (d) Barder, T. E.; Walker, S. D.;
Martinelli, J. R.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 4685-
4
696.
9) Read, M. W.; Escobedo, J. O.; Willis, D. M.; Beck, P. A.; Strongin,
R. M. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 3201-3204.
10) Chotana, A. G.; Holmes, D.; Maleczka, R. E., Jr.; Smith, M. R.,
III. Manuscript in preparation.
(
(
1408
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 7, 2006