C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
The excitation of a CT complex is also a powerful method for
the selective photocycloaddition.16 A charge-transfer absorption is
often observed in related systems.17 However, no CT bands were
observed in the absorption spectra of the HCl salts of 1a-1c in
methanol. Recently, we elucidated the origin of the interaction
between the pyridinium and the aromatic rings by ab initio
calculations,13 in which the long-range interactions, such as the
electrostatic and inductive interactions, predominate. Therefore,
even if a charge-transfer interaction is involved in this system, the
major contributor would be a cation-π interaction.
All of these results described here lead to the conclusion that
pyridinium-π interactions govern the alignment of the trans-
styrylpyridinium cation in solution, the irradiation of which would
result in the selective formation of the syn-HT dimer.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid
for Scientific Research (B) (No. 17350046) from the Japan Society
for the Promotion Science.
Figure 2. X-ray packing structures for (a) 1a and (b) 1a‚HCl. Hydrogen
atoms were omitted for clarity. The nitrogen atoms are indicated with a
red color.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details and
1
characterization of new compounds. H NMR spectra for 4a, 2b, 3b,
5b, 2c, and 3c. X-ray crystallographic data and CIF files for 1a, 1a‚
HCl, 2a, 3a, and 4a. This material is available free of charge via the
The X-ray structures proved that 2a and 3a were syn-HT and syn-
HH dimers, respectively, which are in agreement with those reported
in the literature.9 More important, the X-ray analysis of 4a provided
a revised structure from the reported anti-HT to anti-HH.
Irradiation of compound 1b having a strong electron-withdrawing
CF3 group in the presence of 3 equiv of concentrated HCl resulted
in a significantly lower selectivity compared with the case of 1a
(entry 7); the relative yields of 2b and 6b are 27 and 43%,
respectively. On the other hand, the photodimerization of 1c
possessing a methoxy group resulted in a significantly higher
selectivity; the 95% formation of the syn-HT dimer 2c was observed
along with a small amount of 3c (entry 8). The fact that the
selectivity of the syn-HT dimer 2 is on the order of 1c > 1a > 1b
and that of the cis-isomer 6b is in the opposite order clearly shows
the important role of the electron density around the π-component
in the orientation of the dimerization and the acceleration of the
formation of 2. Because an electrostatic interaction is the major
force of the cation-π interaction,12,13 the substituent effects strongly
suggest the significant contribution of the cation-π interaction in
this reaction. Although an explanation was proposed for this
selectivity, in which the contribution of the charge repulsion
between the pyridinium cations is the main factor,9 this cannot
satisfy the observed acceleration of the formation of 2. Moreover,
this charge repulsion model cannot explain the fact that the syn-
HH dimer 3 decreased in the order of 3b > 3a > 3c.
References
(1) (a) Griesbeck, A. G.; Mattay, J. Synthetic Organic Photochemistry; Marcel
Dekker: New York, 2005. (b) Coyle, J. C. Photochemistry in Organic
Synthesis; The Royal Society of Chemistry: London, 1986. (c) Horspool,
W. M. Synthetic Organic Photochemistry; Plenum Press: New York, 1984.
(2) Tanaka, K.; Toda, F. In Organic Solid-State Reactions; Toda, F., Ed.;
Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2002; pp 109-
158.
(3) Takagi, K.; Shichi, T. In Solid State and Surface Photochemistry;
Ramamurthy, V., Schanze, K. S., Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 2001;
pp 31-110.
(4) Yang, C.; Inoue, Y. In Cyclodextrin Materials Photochemistry, Photo-
physics and Photobiology; Douhal, A., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2006;
Chapter 11.
(5) Ramamurthy, V.; Shailaja, J.; Kaanumalle, L. S.; Sunoj, R. B.; Chan-
drasekhar, J. Chem. Commun. 2003, 1987.
(6) For selected papers, see: (a) Nishijima, M.; Wada, T.; Mori, T.; Pace, T.
C. S.; Bohne, C.; Inoue, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 3478. (b) Takagi,
K.; Suddaby, B. R.; Vadas, S. L.; Backer, C. A.; Whitten, D. G. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 7865. (c) Varshney, D. B.; Gao, X.; Friscic, T.;
MacGillivray, L. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 646. (d) Karthikeyan,
S.; Ramamurthy, V. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 452. (e) Yang, J.; Dewal,
M. B.; Shimizu, L. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 8122.
(7) Amirsakis, D. G.; Elizarov, A. M.; Garcia-Garibay, M. A.; Glink, P. T.;
Stoddart, J. F.; White, A. J. P.; Williams, D. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2003, 42, 1126.
(8) Williams, J. L. R.; Webster, S. K.; Van Allan, J. A. J. Org. Chem. 1961,
26, 4893.
(9) (a) Li, X.-H.; Wu, L.-Z.; Zhang, L.-P.; Tung, C.-H. Org. Lett. 2002, 7,
1175. (b) Zhang, W.-Q.; Zhang, X.-H.; Zheng, Y.; Shen, G.; Zhuang,
J.-P. Ganguang Kexue Yu Guang Huaxue 2000, 18, 144. (c) Quina, F.
H.; Whitten, D. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 877.
A comparison of the X-ray structures of 1a and its HCl salt
supported the existence of the pyridinium-π interaction during the
photodimerization. The packing diagrams of 1a and its salt are
shown in Figure 2a and 2b. Figure 2a clearly shows that the phenyl
and the pyridyl groups are separated from each other and no
stacking orientation is observed. On the contrary, the molecules of
the HCl salts are alternately packed in an antiparallel alignment.
The phenyl and the pyridinium rings are arranged face-to-face with
the distance between them being 3.295 Å, suggesting the existence
of the intermolecular cation-π interaction between them. It has
been reported that the photolysis of this salt in the solid state
provided the syn-HT dimer 2a in high yield.14 This indicates the
similarity of the alignment structures in crystal and in solution. The
related pyridinium systems also show a similar head-to-tail type
alignment.15
(10) (a) Yamada, S.; Inoue, M. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1477. (b) Yamada, S.;
Yamamoto, J.; Ohta, E. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 855. (c) Yamada, S.;
Saitho, M.; Misono, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 5833. (d) Yamada,
S.; Morita, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 8184.
(11) For a review, see: Yamada, S. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5, 2903.
(12) For a review, see: Ma, J. C.; Dougherty, D. A. Chem. ReV. 1997, 97,
1303.
(13) Tsuzuki, S.; Mikami, M.; Yamada, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 8656.
(14) Horner, M.; Hu¨nig, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 6120.
(15) (a) Yamada, S.; Morimoto, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 5673. (b)
Yamada, S.; Morimoto, Y.; Misono, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 5557.
(16) (a) Saito, H.; Mori, T.; Wada, T.; Inoue, Y. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1909. (b)
Saito, H.; Mori, T.; Wada, T.; Inoue, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
1900. (c) Saito, H.; Mori, T.; Wada, T.; Inoue, Y. Chem. Commun. 2004,
1652.
(17) For examples, see: (a) Kim, E. K.; Lee, K. Y.; Kochi, J. K. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1992, 114, 1756. (b) Ishida, T.; Ibe, S.; Inoue, M. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 2 1984, 297. (c) Verhoeven, J. W.; Dirkx, I. P.; de Boer.
T. J. Tetrahedron 1969, 25, 4037.
JA074874Y
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 129, NO. 40, 2007 12101