Electrochemical studies were carried out using a DELL GX110
PC with a General Purpose Electrochemical System (GPES),
version 4.8, software connected to an autolab system containing a
PGSTAT 30 or Type III potentiostat. The techniques used a three-
electrode configuration, with a 0.5 mm diameter Pt disc working
electrode, a Pt rod counter electrode and an Ag/AgCl (saturated
KCl) reference electrode against which the ferrocenium/ferrocene
couple was measured to be +0.55 V. The supporting electrolyte
was 0.1 M tetrabutylammonium tetrafluoroborate (TBABF4).
OTTLE (Optically Transparent Thin Layer Electrode) measure-
ments were taken using a quartz cell of 0.5 mm, a Pt/Rh gauze
working electrode, an Ag/AgCl reference electrode and a Pt wire
counter electrode.24 UV-vis spectra were recorded on a Perkin-
Elmer Lambda 9 spectrophotometer, controlled by a Datalink PC,
running UV/Winlab software. Measurements on samples were
carried out at 233 K in DMF. TBABF4 (0.1 M) was used as the
supporting electrolyte in all cases.
Electron paramagnetic resonance spectra were taken using a
flat cell, a Pt/Rh gauze working electrode, an Ag/AgCl reference
electrode and a Pt wire counter electrode and generated using
a BAS CV-27 voltammograph. Spectra were recorded on an X-
band Bruker ER200D-SCR spectrometer connected to a Datalink
486DX PC with EPR Acquistion System, version 2.42 software.
The temperature was controlled by a Bruker ER4111 VT variable
temperature unit. All g values were corrected to 2,2¢-diphenyl-1-
picrylhydrazyl with gliteratue = 2.0036 0.0002.25 Measurements on
the samples were carried out at 233 K in DMF. TBABF4 (0.1 M)
was used as the supporting electrolyte in all cases.
filter to improve signal-to-noise ratio (Costronics Electronics).
The amplified signal was collected with a digital oscilloscope
(Tektronix, TDS 220), which was synchronized with a trigger
signal of the laser pulse from a photodiode (Thorlabs Inc.,
DET210). To reduce stray light, scattered light and emission from
the sample, two monochromators and appropriate optical cut-
off filters were placed before and after the sample. Owing to the
amplification and noise reduction system, the detectable change
of absorbance was as small as 10-5–10-6.
Acknowledgements
We thank Donald Robertson for providing Na2mnt and Johnson
Matthey for the supply of K2[PtCl4] for use in this study. Financial
support from EPSRC under the Supergen Excitonic Solar Cells
project is gratefully acknowledged. This work has made use of
the resources provided by the EaStCHEM Research Computing
Facility. (http://www.eastchem.ac.uk/rcf). This facility is partially
supported by the eDIKT initiative (http://www.edikt.org).
References
1 (a) S. D. Cummings and R. Eisenberg, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118,
1949; (b) J. S. Pap, F. L. Benedito, E. Bothe, E. Bill, S. D. George, T.
Weyhermueller and K. Wieghardt, Inorg. Chem., 2007, 46, 4187.
2 J. Zhang, P. Du, J. Schneider, P. Jarosz and R. Eisenberg, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2007, 129, 7726.
3 C. Makedonas and C. A. Mitsopoulou, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2006, 590.
4 J. A. Weinstein, M. T. Tierney, E. S. Davies, K. Base, A. A. Robeiro
and M. W. Grinstaff, Inorg. Chem., 2006, 45, 4544.
5 B. O’Regan and M. Gra¨tzel, Nature, 1991, 353, 737; M. Gra¨tzel, Nature,
2001, 414, 338; N. Robertson, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 2338.
6 A. Islam, H. Sugihara, K. Hara, L. P. Singh, R. Katoh, M. Yanagida,
Y. Takahaski, S. Murata and H. Arakawa, New J. Chem., 2000, 24, 343.
7 A. Islam, H. Sugihara, K. Hara, L. P. Singh, R. Katoh, M. Yanagida, Y.
Takahaski, S. Murata and H. Arakawa, Inorg. Chem., 2001, 40, 5371.
8 E. A. M. Geary, L. J. Yellowlees, L. A. Jack, I. D. H. Oswald, S. Parsons,
N. Hirata, J. R. Durrant and N. Robertson, Inorg. Chem., 2005, 44, 242.
9 E. A. M. Geary, K. L. McCall, A. Turner, P. R. Murray, E. J. L.
McInnes, L. J. Yellowlees and N. Robertson, Dalton Trans., 2008, 3701.
10 C. Yang, J. Qin, Q. Yang, J. Si, S. Wang, Y. Wang, P. Ye and C. Ye,
Synth. Mater., 2001, 121, 1491.
DFT calculations were run using Gaussian 03, Revision D.01,26
The images were generated using Arguslab.27 The 6–31G* basis
set was used for the C, N, H, O, Cl and S atoms and the Hay-Wadt
VDZ (n + 1) ECP basis sets for the Pt(II) centre.28
TiO2 film-covered slides prepared using a previously reported
method29 were treated in the furnace at 300 K for 30 min. After
allowing to cool to between 50–100 ◦C the slides were introduced
into an OH bath (pH 11) and left for an hour. The slides were
removed from the basic solution and put to dry in the oven
at 110 ◦C for 30 min before being introduced into the 0.23 M
sensitizing solutions of the dye in MeCN. The prior base treatment
of the slides led to the in situ hydrolysis and subsequent attachment
of the sensitiser dye. The films were removed from the sensitizing
solutions after 48 h and time-resolved kinetics were tested using
these sensitised slides covered with a redox inactive electrolyte
(0.25 M LiClO4 in propylene carbonate).
11 F. Liu and G. J. Meyer, Inorg. Chem., 2003, 42, 7351.
12 F. Liu and G. J. Meyer, Inorg. Chem., 2005, 44, 9305.
13 F. Gajardo, A. M. Leiva, B. Loeb, A. Delgadillo, J. R. Stromberg and
G. J. Meyer, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 2008, 361, 613.
14 P. Qu and G. J. Meyer, Langmuir, 2001, 17, 6720.
15 M. Haga, E. S. Dodsworth and A. B. P. Lever, Inorg. Chem., 1986, 25,
447.
16 Cambridge Structural Database, Chem. Des. Automat. News, 1993, 8,
Transient absorption decays were measured using the “flash
photolysis” technique. The sample was excited with a dye laser
(Photon Technology International Inc., GL-301) pumped by
a nitrogen laser (Photon Technology International Inc., GL-
3300). The excitation wavelength was 450 nm for 3a dye or
530 nm for 5a dye. The excitation wavelengths were chosen so
the amount of photons absorbed by each dye was comparable.
The pulse width was 800 ps, the fluence was about 50 J cm-2
at both excitation wavelengths and the repetition frequency was
1 Hz. A 100 W tungsten–halogen lamp (Bentham, IL1) with a
stabilized power supply (Bentham, 605) was used as a probe light
source. The probe light passing through the sample was detected
with a silicon photodiode (Hamamatsu Photonics, S1722–01).
The signal from the photodiode was pre-amplified and sent
to the main amplification system with an electronic band-pass
31.
17 M. Carnalli, F. Caruso and L. Zambonelli, Cryst. Struct. Commun.,
1980, 9, 721.
18 C. J. Adams, N. Fey, M. Parfitt, S. J. A. Pope and J. A. Weinstein, Dalton
Trans., 2007, 4446.
19 C. Makedonas and C. A. Mitsopoulou, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2006,
2460; C. Makedonas, C. A. Mitsopoulou, F. J. Lahoz and A. I. Balana,
Inorg. Chem., 2003, 42, 8853; C. Makedonas and C. A. Mitsopoulou,
Inorg. Chim. Acta, 2007, 360, 3997.
20 G. Markl and R. Vybiral, Tetrahedron Lett., 1989, 30, 2903.
21 G. M. Sheldrick, SADABS, Program for area detector adsorption
correction, Institute for Inorganic Chemistry, University of Go¨ttingen,
Germany, 1996.
22 P. T. Beurskens, G. Beurskens, R. de Gelder, S. Garcia-Granda, R. O.
Gould, R. Israel and J. M. M. Smits, Crystallography Laboratory,
University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 1999.
23 G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A: Found. Crystallogr., 2008,
64, 112.
6946 | Dalton Trans., 2008, 6940–6947
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2008
©