Arch. Pharm. Pharm. Med. Chem. 2001, 334, 357–360
Dioxane-fused 4-anilinoquinazoline 359
express low level of EGFR and compound 2g containing
General procedure for the preparation of 4-anilino-6,7-
3-F-4-Cl-aniline ring showed more than 150-fold selectivity
ethylenedioxyquinazolines (2a–2h)
for A431 tumor cell line. While all of results are difficult to
interpret, there is an approximate correlation between IC50
and GI50 in the case of compounds (2b–2d) containing a
A mixture of 5 (16 mg, 0.072 mmol), appropriate (un)substi-
tuted aniline (0.144 mmol), and a catalytic amount of conc. HCl
in i-PrOH (4 ml) was heated at reflux for 24 h. The reaction
mixture was cooled to room temperature and the resulting solid
was filtered, washed with i-PrOH, and dried to give 4-anilino-
3
-halogenoaniline ring.
In conclusion, we prepared cyclic analogues 2a–2h of PD
53035 (1) to probe the effect of the dioxane ring on the
6
,7-ethylenedioxyquinazolines 2 as free base.
1
inhibition of EGFR kinase and the growth inhibition of
humantumorcelllines. Amongthem, compound 2b bearing
the 3-chloroaniline ring was as potent as PD153035 against
the EGFR but showed about 5.4-fold better potency than
PD153035 in the inhibition of growth of A431 cell line with
good selectivity. The above results demonstrate that 4-anil-
inoquinazoline fused with 1,4-dioxane would be effective
inhibitor of EGFR when considered on the inhibitory activity
against EGFR kinase and the growth of human tumor cell
lines. Thus, we will try to prepare the various derivatives of
6,7-Ethylenedioxy-(4-phenylamino)quinazoline (2a)
1% Yield; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ 11.04 (1H, s, NH), 8.76 (1H,
4
s, H-2), 8.68 (1H, s, H-10), 8.25 (1H, s, H-5), 7.70 (2H, d, J = 6.6
Hz, H-2′ & H-6′ of aniline), 7.47 (2H, m, H-3′ & H-5′ of aniline),
7.30 (1H, J = 7.5 Hz, H-4′ of aniline), 4.51–4.47 (4H, m, 2 × H-7
& 2 × H-8).
4-[(3-Chlorophenyl)amino]-6,7-ethylenedioxyquinazoline
(
2b)
60% Yield; 1H NMR (DMSO-d ) δ 11.78 (1H, s, NH), 9.60 (1H,
6
1
fold.
,4-dioxane-fused 4-anilinoquinazoline by using this scaf-
s, H-2), 9.10 (1H, s, H-10), 8.69 (1H, s, H-2′ of aniline), 8.46
(1H, d, J = 6.3 Hz, H-6′ of aniline), 8.28–8.22 (2H, m, H-4′ &
H-5′ of aniline), 8.09 (1H, s, H-5), 5.25–5.21 (4H, m, 2 × H-7 &
2
× H-8).
Acknowledgement
4
-[(3-Bromophenyl)amino]-6,7-ethylenedioxyquinazoline
This work was supported by Korea Institute of Science and
Technology (2E16800).
(
2c)
7
3% Yield; mp 230–240 °C; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ 10.95 (1H,
s, NH), 8.80 (1H, s, H-2), 8.27 (1H, s, H-10), 8.07 (1H, s, H-2′
of aniline), 7.78 (1H, d, J = 6,6 Hz, H-6′ of aniline), 7.27–7.43
Experimental part
(
2H, m, H-4′ & H-5′ of aniline), 7.34 (1H, s, H-5), 4.59–4.41 (4H,
+
m, 2 × H-7 & 2 × H-8); EI-MS (m/z): 358 (M ) (calcd mass for
Chemistry
C16H12BrN3O2 358.19).
1H NMR spectra were recorded on a Gemini Varian-300
4
-[(3-Iodophenyl)amino]-6,7-ethylenedioxyquinazoline
(
300 MHz). Mass spectra (EI) were determined on HP GC 5972
(
2d)
and HP MS 5988A system at 70 eV. Analytical thin layer chro-
matography (TLC) was carried out by precoated silica gel (E.
Merck Kiesegel 60F254 layer thickness 0.25 mm). Flash column
chromatography was performed with Merck Kiesegel 60 Art
5% Yield; mp 242–245 °C; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ 11.37 (1H,
9
s, NH), 8.89 (1H, s, H-2), 8.48 (1H, s, H-10), 8.15 (1H, s, H-2′
of aniline), 7.66–7.80 (3H, m, H-4′, H-5′ & H-6′ of aniline), 7.46
9
385 (230–400 mesh). All solvents used were purified accord-
(
1H, s, H-5), 4.69–4.52 (4H, m, 2 × H-7 & 2 × H-8).
ing to standard procedures.
4
-[(3-Trifluoromethylphenyl)amino]-6,7-ethylenedioxy-
6,7-Ethylenedioxy-4(3H)-quinazolin-4-one (4)
quinazoline (2e)
30% Yield; mp 273–275 °C; 1H NMR (DMSO-d ) δ 11.08 (1H,
s, NH), 8.86 (1H, s, H-2), 8.35 (1H, s, H-10), 8.19 (1H, s, H-2′
of aniline), 8.09 (1H, d, J = 8.1 Hz, H-6′ of aniline), 7.65–7.74
A mixture of 7-amino-1,4-benzodioxane-6-carboxylic acid (3,
.13 g, 5.8 mmol), triazine (0.47 g, 5.8 mmol), and piperidine
0.04 ml, 0.58 mol) in EtOH (120 ml) was heated at reflux for
4 h. The precipitated solid was filtered and washed with EtOH.
6
1
(
2
(
2H, m, H-4′ & H-5′ of aniline), 7.34 (1H, s, H-5), 4.50–4.47 (4H,
The filtrate was concentrated and the resulting solid was
washed with EtOH. The combined solid was dried in vacuo to
+
m, 2 × H-7 & 2 × H-8); EI-MS (m/z): 347 (M ) (calcd mass for
C17H12F3N3O2 347.29).
1
give 4 (0.51 g, 43%) as a white solid: mp 209 °C (dec.); H NMR
(
7
(
2
DMSO-d6, 300 MHz) δ 7.95 (1H, s, H-2), 7.45 (1H, s, H-10),
.06 (1H, s, H-5), 4.36–4.33 (4H, m, 2 × H-7 & 2 × H-8), 1.67
1H, s, NH); EI-MS (m/z): 204 (M ) (calcd mass for C10H8N2O3
04.18).
4
-[(4-Fluorophenyl)amino]-6,7-ethylenedioxyquinazoline
(
2f)
+
47% Yield; mp 282–284 °C; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ 11.11 (1H,
s, NH), 8.80 (1H, s, H-2), 8.31 (1H, s, H-10), 7.72 (2H, d, J = 8.0
Hz, H-2′ & H-6′ of aniline), 7.50 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, H-3′ & H-5′
of aniline), 7.34 (1H, s, H-5), 4.50–4.46 (4H, m, 2 × H-7 & 2 ×
H-8); EI-MS (m/z): 297 (M ) (calcd mass for C16H12FN3O2
297.28).
4
-Chloro-6,7-ethylenedioxyquinazoline (5)
+
A solution of 4 (0.56 g, 2.7 mmol) and N,N-dimethylaniline
0.64 ml, 5.5 mmol) in POCl3 (25 ml) was heated at reflux for
h. POCl3 was removed by distillation and the residue was
(
2
diluted with CH2Cl2 and treated with ice-water. The organic
layer was separated and washed with aqueous NaHCO3, brine,
dried (MgSO4), and concentrated to give 5 (0.54 g, 89%) as a
yellowish solid. The crude 5 was used for the next step without
purification: EI-MS (m/z): 222 (M ) (calcd mass for
C10H7ClN2O2 222.63).
4-[(4-Chloro-3-fluorophenyl)amino]-6,7-ethylenedioxy-
quinazoline (2g)
27% Yield; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ 10.33 (1H, s, NH), 8.78 (1H,
s, H-2), 8.31 (1H, s, H-10), 8.20 (1H, s, H-2′ of aniline), 8.10
(1H, d, J = 7.8 Hz, H-6′ of aniline), 7.56 (1H, d, J = 7.8 Hz, H-5′
+