V Mishra, R Nath
CONCLUSIONS
The enzyme amylase has been found to manifest the
bioelectret state. The observed polarization storage
may be attributed to the rotation of polar amino acid
residues or associated side-groups, and bound water
molecules present in three different states in the
amylase macromolecule. Four relaxation polarizations
are observed, with long enough relaxation times to
sustain the FroÈhlich waves that are proposed to play a
fundamental role in the catalytic action of enzymes.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors wish to thank Prof R Srinivasan, the then
Director, Inter-University Consortium (IUC)-India,
for providing experimental facilities, and Dr V
Ganesan, Low Temperature Laboratory, IUC, for
his active cooperation. Financial assistance by CSIR-
India and UGC-India is also gratefully acknowledged.
Figure 6. Effect of hydration on peak magnitude of 300K peak.
TSDC spectrum of glycine,27 one of the active-site
components of amylase; even the activation energy
values are comparable in both cases, being around 1eV.
Thus, in the case of amylase also, it could be concluded
that the rotation of some amino acid residue or
associated side-group in the peptide linkage is respon-
sible for the observed peak around 265K.
REFERENCES
1 FroÈhlich H, Int J Quantum Chem 2:642 (1968).
2 FroÈhlich H, Phys Lett A 44:385 (1973).
3 FroÈhlich H, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72:4211 (1975).
4 Green DE, Ann NY Acad Sci 227:6 (1975).
5 Mascarnehas S, Electrets, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Chapter 6
(1987).
The 300K peak could be attributed to the water
molecules bound at the surface of the macromol-
ecules.21 These are the molecules most remote from
the polypeptide chain and are very weakly bound; they
could be considered to have the usual water properties,
namely they will freeze at low temperature. They may
undergo transition from the bound to the free state
very easily and be easily removed by dehydration.16,17
They may be the possible source for polarization
storage through Maxwell±Wagner type space-charge
polarization, giving rise to a peak around 300K in the
TSDC spectrum of amylase. The observed very high
activation energy value (around 2eV) supports the
above suggestion.
6 Mishra V and Nath R, Indian J Pure Appl Phys 34:197, 996
(1996).
7 Capelletti R and Bridelli MG, Proc 10th Int Symp Electrets, 22±
24 September, 1999, Delphi, Greece. IEEE (1999).
8 Mishra V, Thomas SC and Nath R, Polym Int 47:331 (1998).
9 Anagnostopoulou-Konsta A and Pissis P, J Phys D: Appl Phys
20:1168 (1987).
10 Christodoulides C, J Phys D: Appl Phys 18:1501 (1985).
11 Mishra V, Nath R, Sarvanan P, Ganesan V and Srinivasan R,
Solid State Phys C 39:421 (1996).
12 Turnhout J van, Electrets, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p 81 (1980).
13 Vanderschueren J and Gasiot J, Thermally Stimulated Relaxation
in Solids, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p 135 (1979).
14 Pillai PKC, Narula GK. Tripathi AK and Mandiratta RG, Phys
Status Solidi A 67:651 (1985).
The results of the present investigation support the
FroÈhlich3 model of longitudinal polarization waves
that are proposed to play a fundamental role in the
catalytic action of enzymes. From very general
theoretical considerations, FroÈhlich concluded that,
(i) enzymes should have highly polar metastable states,
and (ii) these should be capable of dipole vibrations,
because the excitation of the highly polar metastable
state is coupled with excitation of dipole oscillations.
Because the enzyme conformation is largely domi-
nated by the interaction of its charged groups with the
surrounding water molecules, such polarization in-
duces the conformational changes that are of para-
mount importance for the catalytic action of enzymes.
In the case of amylase, four relaxation polarizations are
observed with long enough relaxation time (about 2s)
to support FroÈhlich's suggestion of polar metastable
states, ie the enzyme may sustain polarization waves.
The presence of calcium ions is found to be necessary
for the catalytic action of amylase, which may induce
an electric ®eld of high enough magnitude to induce
the bioelectret state in the enzyme.
15 Vassilikou-Dova A, Grigorakakis S and Kounelaki A, Proc 8th
Int Symp Electrets, 27±29 September, 1994, Paris, France.
IEEE (1994).
16 Leveque JL and Garson GC, Biopolymers 16:1725 (1977).
17 Bridelli MG, Capelletti R, Losi S, Mozzarelli A and Vecli A, Proc
8th Int Symp Electrets, 27±29 September, 1994, Paris, France.
IEEE (1994).
18 Pissis P, Apekis L, Christodoulides C and Boudouris G, J Phys
D: Appl Phys 15:2513 (1982).
19 Pissis P, Boudouris G, Gorson JC and Leveque JL, Z Naturforsch
Teil A 36:321 (1989).
20 Anagnostopoulou-Konsta A, Apekis L and Tsoukaris G, Proc
7th Int Symp Electrets, 23±27 September, 1991, Potsdam,
GDR. IEEE (1991).
21 Pissis P, Diamanti D and Boudouris D, J Phys D: Appl Phys
16:1311 (1983).
22 Pissis P, J Phys D: Appl Phys 18:1897 (1985).
23 Pottel R, Adolph D and Keatze U, Ber Bunsenges Phys Chem
79:278 (1975).
24 Tait MJ, Suggett A, Franks F, Ablett S and Quickenden PA, J Sol
Chem 1:131 (1972).
25 Berthold J, Desbrieres J, Rinaudo M and Sanmen, Polymer
35:5729 (1994).
26 Nobuhiro M, Nobuyuki A, Naoki S and Satoru M, Biopolymers
34:357 (1994).
27 Mishra V and Nath R, Indian J Pure Appl Phys 36:477 (1998).
702
Polym Int 49:699±702 (2000)