2
M. Tümer et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 1199 (2020) 127018
2. Experimental
structures [13]. Crystallographic diffraction data for L1 were ob-
tained at 150(2) K. A single crystal of L2 was mounted on a fiber and
nitrogen cryostream was adjusted to 150(2) K. However, the crystal
lost crystallinity and became white powder at this temperature.
Therefore, the data for L2 were collected at room temperature with
no problem. The structures were solved by direct methods and
refined on F2 using all the reflections [13]. All the non-hydrogen
atoms were refined using anisotropic atomic displacement pa-
rameters and hydrogen atoms bonded to carbon atoms were
inserted at calculated positions using a riding model. Details of the
crystal data and refinement are given in Table 1. Bond distances and
angles for compounds are given in the supplementary documents
(Tables S1 and S2).
2.1. Materials and measurements
All reagents and solvents were of reagent-grade quality and
obtained from commercial suppliers (Aldrich or Merck). Elemental
analyses (C,H,N) were performed using a LECO CHNS 932. Infrared
spectra were obtained using KBr disc (4000-400 cmꢀ1) on a Per-
kinElmer Spectrum 100 FT-IR. The electronic spectra in the
200e900 nm range were obtained on a PerkinElmer Lambda 45
spectrophotometer. Mass spectra of the ligands were recorded on a
LC/MS APCI AGILENT 1100 MSD spectrophotometer. 1H and 13C
NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker 400 MHz instrument. TMS
was used as internal standard and CDCl3 as solvent. The thermal
analysis studies of the compounds were performed on a Perki-
nElmer STA 6000 simultaneous Thermal Analyzer under nitrogen
atmosphere at a heating rate of 10 ꢁC/min. The DSC analysis of the
synthesised compounds were performed on DSC (PerkinElmer
DSC-8000) using continuous heating and cooling under a pure ni-
trogen (N2) atmosphere. The samples (about 2 mg) are accurately
weighed by using a precision balance and the weighed samples
were sealed in aluminium pans. The samples were heated up to the
estimated clearing temperature at heating rate of 10 ꢁC/min and
stayed at its isotropic temperature for 4 min to reach thermal
stability.
2.3. General procedure for the synthesis of 4-(heptyloxy)-3-
methoxybenzaldehyde (L1) and 4-(decyloxy)-3-
methoxybenzaldehyde (L2)
A mixture of 4-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde (1 mmol), 1-
bromoheptane (1 mmol) and K2CO3 (3 mmol) in N,N-dimethyl
formamide (25 mL) was stirred at room temperature for 4 h. The
reaction was monitored by TLC. After the completion of reaction,
the product was extracted into ether layer and it was dried over
anhydrous
Na2SO4
to
obtain
4-(heptyloxy)-3-
methoxybenzaldehyde (L1). Similar procedure except using 1-
bromodecane rather than 1-bromoheptane was followed up to
obtain 4-(decyloxy)-3-methoxybenzaldehyde (L2).
The single-photon fluorescence spectra of the vanillin based
compounds L1 and L2 were collected on a PerkinElmer LS55 lumi-
nescence spectrometer. All samples were prepared in spectropho-
tometric grade solvents and analysed in a 1 cm optical path quartz
cuvette. The solutions of ligands (1.0 ꢂ 10ꢀ3 mol Lꢀ1) were prepared
in DMF solvent.
L1: C15H22O3: Yield: 98%, color: Dirty white, melting point:
38e40 ꢁC. Elemental Analysis (%): Found (Calcd.): C, 72.02 (71.97%);
H, 8.81 (8.86%). 1H NMR (
d, ppm; CDCl3): 9.85 (1H, s, eHC]O),
7.43e7.45 (1H, dd (j: 1.8, 8.1 Hz), AreH), 7.41 (1H, d (j: 1.8 Hz),
AreH), 6.96e6.98 (1H, d (j: 8.1 Hz), AreH), 4.12 (2H, t, OeCH2-),
3.93 (3H, s, OeCH3), 1.92 (2H, p, OeCeCH2-), 1.49e1.32 (8H, m,
A stock solution in the 1 ꢂ 10ꢀ3 M concentration of the vanillin
based compounds L1 and L2 was prepared in DMF for electro-
chemical studies. Cyclic voltammograms were recorded on a
Iviumstat Electrochemical workstation equipped with a low cur-
rent module (BAS PAe1) recorder. The electrochemical cell was
equipped with a BAS glassy carbon working electrode (area
4,6 mm2), a platinum coil auxiliary electrode and a Agþ/AgCl
reference electrode filled with tetrabutylammonium tetra-
floroborate (0.1 M) in DMF and DMF solution and adjusted to 0.00 V
vs SCE. Cyclic voltammetric measurements were made at room
temperature in an undivided cell (BAS model C-3 cell stand) with a
platinum counter electrode and an Agþ/AgCl reference electrode
(BAS). All potentials are reported with respect to Agþ/AgCl. The
solutions were deoxygenated by passing dry nitrogen through the
solution for 30 min prior to the experiments, and during the ex-
periments the flow was maintained over the solution. Digital
simulations were performed using DigiSim 3.0 for windows (BAS,
Inc.). Experimental cyclic voltammograms used for the fitting
process had the background subtracted and were corrected elec-
tronically for ohmic drop. Mettler Toledo MP 220 pH meters was
used for the pH measurements using a combined electrode (glass
electrode reference electrode) with an accuracy of 0.05 pH.
Eclipse E200, Nikon Japan Polarised optical microscope (POM)
equipped with the digital camera was used. Temperature of sample
was controlled with heating stage LTS 120, with PE95 LinkPad ac-
curacy of 0.1 C from LinkamScientific Instrument, Ltd., England.
POM studies carried out not only to observe the morphological
texture of prepared samples but also to monitor phase transitions.
aliphatic-CH2), 0.88(3H, t, eCH3). 13C NMR (
d, ppm; CDCl3):
14.05e31.71 (Aliphatic -CH2-, -CH3), 56.02 (OCH3), 68.99 (OCH2-),
109.18e154.30 (AreC), 190.70 (-HC]O). FTIR (KBr, cmꢀ1): 2927
n(CeH)alph, 1677
n(C]O), 1393 n(CeO)phenolic, 781 n(out of plane
CeH).
L2: C18H28O3: Yield: 82%, color: Dirty white, melting point:
52e55 ꢁC. Elemental Analysis (%): Found (Calcd.): C, 73.97 (73.93);
H, 9.68 (9.65%). 1H NMR (
d, ppm; CDCl3): 9.86 (1H, s, eHC]O), 7.44
(1H, dd (j: 1.8, 8.1 Hz), AreH), 7.43 (1H, d (j: 1.8 Hz), AreH), 6.99 (1H,
Table 1
Crystallographic data for the compounds.
Identification code
L1
L2
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature(K)
Crystal system
Space group
C15H22O3
250.33
150(2)
C18H28O3
292.40
293(2)
Monoclinic
P2(1)/c
Triclinic
P1
Unit cell
a (Å)
b (Å)
c (Å)
a
b
g
8.4137 (18)
9.939 (2)
17.509 (4)
102.404 (3)
94.736 (3)
101.260 (3)
1390.6 (5)
4
22.131 (3)
9.3398 (13)
8.5515 (12)
90
93.341 (2)
90
1764.6 (4)
4
1.101
(ꢁ)
(ꢁ)
(ꢁ)
Volume (Å3)
Z
Calculated density(g/cm3)
1.196
0.082
Abs. coeff. (mmꢀ1
)
0.073
2.2. X-ray crystallography for compounds L1 and L2
Refl. collected
5756
15312
R1, wR2 [I > 2
s
(I)]
0.0472,0.1339
0.0889,0.1641
0.762
0.0419,0.1216
0.0818,0.1527
1.008
R1, wR2 (all data)
Goodness-of-fit on F2
CCDC
Data were collected on a Bruker ApexII CCD diffractometer using
Mo-K
a
radiation (
l
¼ 0.71073 Å). Data reduction was performed
1062277
1062278
using Bruker SAINT [12]. SHELXTL was used to solve and refine the