428 J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 122, No. 3, 2000
Rogers et al.
as double-stranded DNA fragments, upon UV irradiation and
treatment with hot piperidine.4 Specific cleavage at the 5′-side
of 5′-GG-3′ steps was observed. Upon nitration of the naph-
thalimide ring, photocleavage at thymine sites was also ob-
served. Variable selectivity between these two modes of
cleavage was obtained, depending upon the position of the nitro
substituent. In a subsequent publication, Saito et al. demonstrated
that irradiation of this L-lysine 1,8-naphthalimide derivative in
the presence of a duplex hexamer selectively produced piperi-
dine-labile damage at the 5′-side of 5′-GG-3′ sites.5 Using laser
flash photolysis, the one-electron reduced imide was directly
detected. Production of this species was via bimolecular
quenching of the naphthalimide triplet state. The quenching rate
constant was estimated to be 5.3 × 107 M-1 s-1. When the
photoinduced reaction is not base-specific and not reversible,
site-specific damage is rendered only when the chromophore
is tightly associated with the target of interest. This prerequisite
localizes the site of damage and results in rapid (since the
process is not diffusion controlled) photochemical reactions.
Moreover, rapid excited state quenching by the associated target
precludes the formation of diffusible species (e.g., singlet
oxygen). Although the naphthalimide derivatives are flat planar
species, likely to intercalate between DNA base pairs, no
evidence of ground-state complexation was indicated in the
reports of Saito et al.4,5
In a series of separate reports, the noncovalent interactions
of a series of N-alkylamine-substituted naphthalene imides with
DNA were assessed.7-10 Since the pendant alkylamine is
protonated in neutral aqueous solution, the binding constants
were shown to be strongly dependent upon ionic strength.9 For
a given DNA substrate, imide substituent, and ionic strength
(0.10 M NaCl), the binding constants for the naphthaldiimide
derivatives (K ) (3.0-4.6) × 105 M-1) were ∼10-fold larger
than those of the corresponding naphthalene monoimide.7
The ability of functionalized naphthalene imides and diimides
to strongly associate with DNA and, in certain cases, exhibit a
binding preference for GC-rich regions,10 makes them viable
candidates to explore the photoredox chemistry while associated
to DNA. A detailed understanding of the photochemical
mechanisms must first consider the nature of the excited states
responsible for damage. Under conditions where the chromo-
phore is not associated with the DNA polymer, photodamage
initiated by triplet states will predominate, owing to their long
lifetimes. However, upon association of the chromophore to the
target, rapid nucleotide oxidation by the singlet excited-state
becomes competitive. Triplet-state quenching of a naphthalene
imide by oligonucleotide duplexes has been demonstrated.5
However, the partitioning of singlet and triplet state reactivity,
while associated with the oligonucleotides, has not been
explored.
state remains unclear in cases where the chromophore is
associated with the DNA polymer. Moreover, the photoredox
activity of the excited states of the corresponding naphthaldi-
imide chromophore with DNA has not been characterized.
Although a number of organic and inorganic chemical systems
have been employed to photochemically cleave oligonucleotide
polymers, the photochemical efficiency has not been systemati-
cally correlated with extent of ground-state complexation. In
this paper, we (a) report the synthesis of a novel pair of cationic
naphthalene imide and diimide derivatives, (b) characterize the
noncovalent interactions of these two photoredox reagents with
calf-thymus DNA, and (c) demonstrate the first systematic
investigation of the relative roles of singlet and triplet excited
states in nucleotide oxidation.
Experimental Section
Materials. 2-Bromoethylamine hydrobromide, 1,4,5,8-naphthalene-
tetracarboxylic dianhydride, ethanolamine (99+ %), p-toluenesolfonyl
chloride (99+%), methyl viologen dichloride hydrate (98%), 1,4-
diazobicyclo [2.2.2]-octane (DABCO) (98%) and benzyl viologen
dichloride (97%) were used as received from Aldrich Chemicals
(Milwaukee, WI). 1,8-naphthalic anhydride (97%, Acros) was recrystal-
lized from N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMA) and dried in vacuo prior to
use. Sodium hydrogen phosphate (99%) was obtained from Acros and
used as received. Solutions of calf-thymus DNA (highly polymerized
sodium salt (Sigma, St. Louis, MO)) were sonicated at 25 °C for 1 h.
The resulting solution was filtered through a 0.45 µM Millipore filter.
DNA concentrations (in base pairs) were determined spectroscopically
using ꢀ ) 13 200 M-1 cm-1 at 260 nm.11 DNA stock solutions were
stored at 4 °C and discarded after one week.
Water was deionized and freshly passed through an Ion-Pure Reverse
Osmosis system. The system utilizes a point of use cartridge system,
followed by UV irradiation to provide > 18 MΩ ultrapure bacteria-
free water. Other materials were obtained from commercial sources.
N-(2-(N-Pyridinium)ethyl)-1,8-naphthalene Imide (NI, 1). Etha-
nolamine (5 mL) was added dropwise over 15 min to a solution of
1,8-naphthalic anhydride (3.46 g, 17.4 mmol) in 40 mL of DMA. The
mixture was heated at 100 °C for 2 h. The crude reaction mixture was
concentrated on a rotary evaporator,and the product washed with 95%
ethanol. The resulting N-(2-ethanol)-1,8-naphthalimide (3.16 g, 13.1
mmol) and p-toluenesulfonyl chloride (2.75 g, 14.4 mmol) were stirred
in pyridine at room temperature for 20 h and then refluxed for 5 h.
After conversion to the chloride salt (DOWEX 1 × 8-200 ion-exchange
resin), the crude product was recrystallized in methanol under an
atmosphere of acetone. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): 9.20 (d, 2H, pyr), 8.60
(t, 1H, pyr), 8.40 (d+d, 4H, napht), 8.05 (t, 2H, pyr), 7.80 (t, 2H, napht),
4.95 (t, 2H, -CH2), 4.60 (t, 2H, -CH2). Anal. Calcd C, 67.36, H, 4.43,
N, 8.27. Found C, 66.57, H, 4.43, N, 8.15. UV max (10 mM phosphate
buffer; pH 7.00) 344 nm (ꢀ ) 13 500 M-1 cm-1); 264 nm (4800 M-1
cm-1); 232 nm (ꢀ ) 38 900 M-1 cm-1); 214 nm (ꢀ ) 21 700 M-1
cm-1).
N,N′-bis-[2-(N-Pyridinium)ethyl]-1,4,5,8-naphthalene Diimide (NDI,
2). Ethanolamine (10 mL) was added dropwise (over a period of 15
min) to a solution of 1,4,5,8-naphthalenetetracarboxylic dianhydride
(5.00 g, 18.6 mmol) in 40 mL N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF). The
reaction mixture was heated at 90 °C for 2 h. The resulting N,N′-(2-
ethanol)-1,4,5,8-naphthalene diimide (3) was filtered, and the precipitate
was washed with acetone. Compound (3) (2.3 g, 9.02 mmol) and
p-toluenesulfonyl chloride (3.78 g, 19.84 mmol) were stirred in pyridine
at room temperature for 20 h and then refluxed for 5 h. The product
was filtered, and the precipitate was washed with acetone and
recrystallized from methanol. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): 9.24 (d, 4H, pyr),
8.61 (t + s, 6H, pyr + napht), 8.09 (t, 4H, pyr), 4.96 (t, 4H, -CH2),
4.62 (t, 4H, -CH2). Anal. Calcd (for NDI‚2H2O) C, 57.44, H, 4.44,
N, 9.57. Found C, 57.10, H, 4.41, N, 9.51. UV max (10 mM phosphate
buffer; pH 7.00): 382 nm (ꢀ ) 25 600 M-1 cm-1), 362 nm (ꢀ ) 21 000
M-1 cm-1), 260 nm (ꢀ ) 9720 M-1 cm-1), 234 nm (ꢀ ) 35 200 M-1
cm-1).
We have previously demonstrated that the triplet states of
naphthalene imide and diimide systems do oxidize individual
nucleotides.6 However, nucleotide oxidation in DNA polymers
by these imide excited states has not yet been demonstrated.
The reports by Saito et al. provide convincing evidence that
the triplet excited states of 1,8-naphthalimide derivatives does,
indeed, produce oxidized nucleotide, with subsequent oligo-
nucleotide cleavage. However, the role of the singlet excited
(7) Yen, S.-F.; Gabbay, E. J.; Wilson, W. D. Biochemistry 1982, 21,
2070-2076.
(8) Hopkins, H. P.; Stevenson, K. A.; Wilson, W. D. J. Solution Chem.
1986, 15, 563-579.
(9) Tanious, F. A.; Yen, S.-F.; Wilson, W. D. Biochemistry 1991, 30,
1813-1819.
(10) Liu, Z.-R.; Hecker, K. H.; Rill, R. L. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 1996,
14, 331-339.
(11) Armitage, B.; Yu, C.; Devadoss, C.; Schuster, G. B. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1994, 116, 9847-9859.