(51%), possibly owing to reduced selectivity in the oxidation
of the diene. Some improvement was realized when the
oxidation was conducted using Sharpless’ asymmetric di-
hydroxylation conditions. Thus, treatment of 17 with AD-
mix-R at room temperature for 23 h afforded a 59% yield
9
of the diol.
Hydrogenation of the remaining olefin in 18 proved to be
less than straightforward. Isomerization of the double bond
was observed under standard conditions (Pd(OH)
(1 atm)), leading to a 1:1 mixture of the cis- and trans-
tetrahydrofurans. After examining several sets of conditions
and catalysts, it was found that using PtO as catalyst under
5 psi H provided the tetrahydrofuran in 99% overall yield
with less than 4% of the cis-tetrahydrofuran being formed.
To set the stage for the second cycloisomerization reaction,
the diol was cleaved to the corresponding aldehyde with
2
/C, EtOAc,
Figure 1. Observed NOE signals in 6.
H
2
2
alkene, and transformation of the acyclic alkene into a new
allyl propargyl ether. Direct oxidation of the terminal alkene
proved to be difficult. Ozonolysis of 6 did not lead to the
desired aldehyde, and dihydroxylation was sluggish owing
to the proximity of the trimethylsilyl group. In the end, after
conducting the dihydroxylation at reflux in acetone with
4
2
4
NaIO . Addition of the Grignard reagent formed from lithium
trimethylsilylacetylide and magnesium bromide etherate
proceeded cleanly and in high yield. However, under the best
4
NMO and catalytic OsO , only a 36% yield of the dihy-
droxylated product could be obtained. To remove the steric
hindrance to oxidation, the silyl group was removed by
treatment with TBAF (6 equiv) in THF at reflux for 6 h,
affording diene 17 in 99% yield. Dihydroxylation of 17 was
much more facile, proceeding to completion within 4 h at
room temperature. The yield of isolated diol was still modest
2 2
conditions found (5 equiv MgBr , -40 °C, Et O), the
stereoselectivity of the addition was only modest, ranging
from 1.5 to 2.5:1. As expected, the major product resulted
1
0
from a Cram-chelate attack on the aldehyde. Use of the
corresponding triisopropoxy-titanium reagent gave a modest
1
1
reversal of selectivity (1:2), whereas other metals such as
zinc and lithium gave no selectivity whatsoever. The mixture
of alcohols could be oxidized to a single ketone with Dess-
Martin periodinane in 92% yield. However reduction with a
Scheme 3
4 4 2 3
series of reducing agents such as NaBH , Zn(BH ) , LiBHEt ,
and L-Selectride gave no significant improvement in dia-
stereoselectivity relative to the Grignard reaction.
Direct separation of the alcohol diastereomers 19a and b
proved impossible by chromatography. However, conversion
to the corresponding dicobalt hexacarbonyl complexes al-
f
lowed a very easy separation by chromatography (R differ-
ence of 0.2 in 10% EtOAc/hexanes). After separation of the
isomers, the cobalt could be removed by oxidation with
NMO to afford the alcohols 19a and 19b, with a mass
balance of 95%. In several cases, we have found that the
formation of cobalt complexes allows facile separation of
diastereomeric propargylic alcohols (e.g., precursor to 13).
This may prove to be a general method for separating this
class of stereoisomers.
Allylation of the major addition product, 19a, with
n-butyllithium and allyl bromide proceeded in 70% yield.
Finally, subjection of the allyl ether to the cycloisomerization
conditions defined above readily furnished the diether 20a
in 55% yield. A similar sequence with 19b afforded 20b,
also in good yield. Both reactions proceeded with complete
stereocontrol, and NOE studies again confirmed that both
(
9) Kolb, H. C.; VanNieuwenhze, M. S.; Sharpless, K. B. Chem. ReV.
994, 94, 2483.
10) The stereochemistry of 19a and b was determined by coupling
1
(
constant analysis, which has been shown to be reliable for this class of
compounds. See: (a) Horton, D.; Tronchet, J. M. J. Carbohydr. Res. 1966,
2
3
1
, 315. (b) Horton, D.; Hughes, J. B.; Thomson, J. K. J. Org. Chem. 1968,
3, 728. (c) Grese, T. A.; Hutchinson, K. D.; Overman, L. E. J. Org. Chem.
993, 58, 2468.
(11) Reetz, M. T. Organotitanium Reagents in Organic Synthesis;
Springer: Berlin, 1986. See also ref 11c and Tabusa, F.; Yamada, T.; Suzuki,
K.; Mukaiyama, T. Chem. Lett. 1984, 405.
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 26, 2001
4163