464
M.S. Deshmukh, N. Sekar / Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 135 (2015) 457–465
distance between O23AH37 bond increases by 0.009 Å from the
E-enol (0.997 Å) to the E*-enol (1.006 Å), which means that in the
excited state (E-Enol) the H37 approaches near the N13 via hydro-
gen bonding for the proton transfer. The distance between
Here, we report the ground and excited state dipole moments of
the compounds 6a–6b using Bakhshiev [43] and Kawski–Cham-
ma–Viallet correlations [44,45]. This method is based on a linear
relation between the absorption, emission maxima and solvent
polarity functions (ENT ) [46–48] which is dependent on both the rel-
O23AC17 bond decreases by 0.015 Å from the ground state enol
(1.351 Å) to the excited state enol (1.336 Å), which is further
decreased by 0.071 Å in the excited state keto form (1.265 Å). In
addition to this, the bond angle H37AO23AC17 increases by 0.28°
from the ground state enol (107.96°) to the excited state enol
(108.24°) (Table S12). In this pathway, H37 approaches closer to
ative permittivity (e) and refractive index (g) of the solvent. The
polarity function of solvent has been taken from literature [49].
By using the solvatochromic data and polarity function of sol-
vents, we calculated the dipole moment ratio of the excited state
to the ground state of the compounds 6a and 6b. The experimental
dipole moments were compared with the dipole moments in the
vacuum phase computed by DFT and TD-DFT computation
(Table 7). The dipole moment obtained from short wavelength
emission data compared with the ratio of the dipole moment of
excited state enol and ground state enol form in vacuum phase.
However, the long wavelength emission data is compared with
ratio of dipole moment of the excited state keto and the ground
state keto form in vacuum phase. These results clearly indicate that
a large difference is observed between the dipole moment obtained
from the solvatochromism data and the computed dipole moment.
Dipole moments of the compounds 6a–6b were computed in
the different solvents by DFT and TD-DFT to investigate the elec-
tronic behavior from the ground state to the excited state in differ-
ent solvents. We observed that the dipole moments of the
compounds 6a and 6b are higher for the excited state enol and
the ground state keto forms and lower for the ground state enol
and the excited state keto; this is due to the excited state of the
enol form and the ground state of the keto form stabilized by sol-
vation or hydrogen bonding with different solvents. The plots of
N13 of the imidazole unit in the excited state enol form and further
transfer to N leads to the excited state keto (K*) form with NAH
bond distance of 1.021 Å and H37AO23 bond distance of 1.901 Å.
The excited state keto returns to the ground state keto (K) con-
former with NAH bond distance of 1.046 Å and H37AO23 hydrogen
bonding distance of 1.690 Å. As H37 approaches to O23, the excited
state keto (K*) hydrogen bonding distance decreases by 0.211 Å
from 1.901 to 1.690 Å and it is immediately converted to the
ground state keto (K) conformer followed by the ground state enol
(E) form. Similar structural behavior is observed for the compound
6b (Tables S13–S16, Fig. S15).
In the case of the excited state enol (E*) of the compound 6a, as
the solvent polarity increases the O23AC17 and N13AH37 bond dis-
tance increases from 1.335 to 1.337 and 1.679 to 1.684 Å, while
O23AH37 and C14AC16 bond length decreases from 1.008 to
1.006 Å and from 1.448 to 1.445 Å, respectively (Fig. S16, Tables
S9–S10). The Mulliken charges on N13 and H37 in all the solvents
increase from the ground state enol (E) to the excited state enol
(E*) (Fig. S17, Table S11) while at the same time decrease for O23
atom indicating that in the excited state enol (E*) form, H37 is in
close proximity of N13 atom, which is favorable for ESIPT. From
the excited state (K*-Keto) to the ground state (K-Keto) Mulliken
charges for O23, H37 and N13 atom increases (Fig. S18, Table S11),
which supports the ESIPT process. Similar observation is observed
in the compound 6b (Figs. S19–S21).
the dipole moment (l
) versus solvent polarity function (ENT ) of
compounds 6a–6b enol and keto form in the ground and the
excited state is shown in Tables S17–S18; Figs. S22–S23.
Conclusion
To conclude, this paper reports the synthesis of the fluorescent
2-(2-hydroxyphenyl)-6-methylimidazo[4,5-f]isoindole-
Effect of solvent polarity on the ground and the excited state dipole
moments
5,7(1H,6H)-dione and its derivative. This compound is well charac-
terized by FTIR, 1H NMR and mass spectroscopy. The thermal sta-
bility was determined by TGA analysis and it was found that the
compounds are thermally stable. The compounds 6a and 6b shows
a single prominent absorption peak but in the case of emission of
compound 6a dual in non-polar, polar aprotic and single emission
in polar protic solvent. While in compound 6b dual emission
observed only in ethanol and DMF. The photophysical properties
of the compounds are sensitive toward the solvent environment.
The highest quantum efficiency was observed in THF (6a = 0.15,
6b = 0.10). Photophysical properties of the synthesized compounds
were supported by DFT and it was observed that computational
results are good agreement with the theoretical observations.
The polarity of the solvents affects the fluorescence properties
due to their solvation or hydrogen bonding with heteroatom pres-
ent in the compounds. The dipole moment also depends on the
polarity as well as the groups present in the molecule. The geom-
etry of the compound at the ground and the excited state decide
their electronic behavior. The effect of the solvent on the absorp-
tion and the emission spectra clearly indicates the change in the
dipolar characteristics of the compounds in the excited state,
which means that the solvatochromic data gives an efficient tool
to understand the change in the dipole moment in the first excited
state.
Table 7
Dipole moment (l in Debye) of the compounds 6a and 6b.
Compounds
aEnol lg
bEnol le
bEnol le
aEnol lg
aKeto lg
5.819
bKeto le
5.612
bKeto le
aKeto lg
cExperimental
Dipole moment
% D
6a
6b
a
6.082
6.731
1.107
0.964
0.44d
0.12e
2.54d
3.8e
60f
88g
4.7002
4.921
1.047
4.139
3.812
0.921
59f
76g
Dipole moment of the compound in ground state.
Dipole moment of the compound in excited state.
b
c
d
e
f
Experimental dipole moment obtained from solvatochromism data using Bakhshiev and Kawski–Chamma–Viallet correlations.
Dipole moment at the short wavelength emission obtained from the solvatochromism data using Bakhshiev and Kawski–Chamma–Viallet correlations.
Dipole moment at the longer wavelength emission obtained from solvatochromism data using Bakhshiev and Kawski–Chamma–Viallet correlations.
(% D)% Deviation between the experimental and the computed dipole moment for short wavelength emission.
g
(% D)% Deviation between the experimental and computed dipole moment for long wavelength emission.