Published on Web 02/01/2002
A Supramolecular Microfluidic Optical Chemosensor
Christina M. Rudzinski, Albert M. Young, and Daniel G. Nocera*,†
†
‡,§
Contribution from the Department of Chemistry, 6-335, Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
7
7 Massachusetts AVenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139-4307, and Lincoln Laboratory,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 244 Wood Street, Lexington, Massachusetts 02420-9108
Received June 1, 2001. Revised Manuscript Received November 6, 2001
Abstract: A supramolecular microfluidic optical chemosensor (µFOC) has been fabricated. A serpentine
channel has been patterned with a sol-gel film that incorporates a cyclodextrin supramolecule modified
3+
3+
with a Tb macrocycle. Bright emission from the Tb ion is observed upon exposure of the µFOC to
biphenyl in aqueous solution. The signal transduction mechanism was elucidated by undertaking steady-
state and time-resolved spectroscopic measurements directly on the optical chemosensor patterned within
the microfluidic network. The presence of biphenyl in the cyclodextrin receptor site triggers Tb3 emission
by an absorption-energy transfer-emission process. These results demonstrate that the intricate signal
transduction mechanisms of supramolecular optical chemosensors are successfully preserved in microfluidic
environments.
+
specially tailored supramolecular chemosensors1
1-15
in which
Introduction
a noncovalent molecular recognition event at a receptor site is
communicated by physical or chemical means to a reporter site,
which produces a measurable optical signal. This “3R” sensing
scheme of recognize, relay, and report typically relies on the
chemical and physical compatibility between the analyte and
the crafted supramolecular binding site, relay mechanisms
involving intricate energy or electron transfer and specially
tailored photophysical properties of the reporter site.
Microfluidic (µF) devices are emerging as an important
technology for chemo- and bioanalytical applications. The
miniaturization offered by µF devices allows for the analysis
of fluid samples to be performed on a chip, leading to
advantages such as reduced sample volume, increased reaction
speed, and the possibility of massive parallelism.1-8 One method
1
for rapidly prototyping µF networks involves conformally
contacting a micromolded elastomeric polymer such as poly-
Following the 3R approach, we have created a cyclodextrin
(
dimethylsiloxane) to a glass or quartz substrate, thus forming
3
+
9,10
(CD) supramolecule appended with a Tb macrocycle (1 in
enclosed microchannels.
To date, optical analysis on µF
Figure 1) for the optical detection of polyaromatic hydrocarbons
platforms has been performed by direct spectroscopic detection
methods. The advantage of this approach is that signal trans-
duction is easy to implement within the constraints imposed by
the µF environment. The simplicity of the detection method,
however, has inherent limitations; these include difficulties
associated with selectively distinguishing analyte (usually
because an optical signature must be identified from a multi-
component spectral envelope) and the measurement of an optical
signal against a bright background, to name a few. Such
limitations may be overcome when analytes are detected by
1
6,17
in aqueous solutions.
hydrocarbon in the CD bucket is signaled by the appearance of
Molecular recognition of the aromatic
3
+
green luminescence from the encrypted Tb ion. Detailed
mechanistic investigations show signal transduction to proceed
via an absorption-energy transfer-emission (AETE) mechanism
in which excitation energy absorbed by the bound analyte is
3+
transferred from its long-lived triplet excited state to the Tb
1
8
reporter site. The appearance of green luminescence against
a dark background enables polyaromatics to be detected at
submicromolar concentrations with no need for amplification.
In view of the benefits gained in selectivity and sensitivity, the
†
Department of Chemistry, MIT.
Lincoln Laboratory, MIT.
Current address: IBM Emerging Products, Microelectronics Division,
‡
§
Hopewell Junction, New York 12533.
(11) Rudzinski, C. M.; Nocera, D. G. In Optical Sensors and Switches; Schanze,
K., Ramamurthy, V., Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 2001; Vol. 7, p 1.
(12) de Silva, A. P.; Gunaratne, H. Q. N.; Gunnlaugsson, T.; Huxley, A. J. M.;
McCoy, C. P.; Rademacher, J. T.; Rice, T. E. Chem. ReV. 1997, 97, 1515.
(13) Chemosensors of Ion and Molecular Recognition; Desvergne, J.-P., Czarnik,
A. W., Eds.; NATO Advanced Study Institute Series C; Kluwer Aca-
demic: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1997; Vol. 492.
(
1) Manz, A., Becker, H., Eds. Microsystem Technology in Chemistry and
Life Sciences. Topics in Current Chemistry; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1998;
Vol. 194.
(
2) Jakeway, S. C.; de Mello, A. J.; Russel, E. L. Fresenius’ J. Anal. Chem.
2
000, 366, 525.
(
(
(
3) Sanders, G. H. W.; Manz, A. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2000, 19, 364.
4) Regnier, F. E.; He, B.; Lin, S.; Busse, J. Trends Biotechnol. 1999, 17, 101.
5) Guenat, O. T.; Fiaccabrino, G. C.; Morf, W. E.; Koudelka-Hep, M.; de
Rooij, N. F. Chimia 1999, 53, 87.
(14) Fluorescent Chemosensors for Ion and Molecule Recognition; Czarnik, A.
W., Ed.; ACS Symposium Series 538; American Chemical Society:
Washington, DC, 1993.
(6) Delamarche, E.; Bernard, A.; Schmid, H.; Bietsch, A.; Michel, B.; Biebuyck,
(15) Czarnik, A. W. Acc. Chem. Res. 1994, 27, 302.
H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 500.
7) Weigl, B. H.; Yager, P. Science 1999, 283, 346.
8) Manz, A.; Grabner, N.; Widmer, H. M. Sens. Actuators, B1 1990, 244.
9) Kim, E.; Xia, Y.; Whitesides, G. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 5722.
(16) Mortellaro, M. A.; Nocera, D. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 7414.
(17) Rudzinski, C. M.; Hartmann, W. H.; Nocera, D. G. Coord. Chem. ReV.
1998, 171, 115.
(
(
(
(18) Rudzinski, C. M.; Engebretson, D. S.; Hartmann, W. K.; Nocera, D. G. J.
Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 7442.
(
10) Kim, E.; Xia, Y.; Whitesides, G. M. Nature 1995, 376, 581.
10.1021/ja010176g CCC: $22.00 © 2002 American Chemical Society
J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
9
VOL. 124, NO. 8, 2002 1723