26
L. Zhou et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 166 (2016) 25–30
Recently, 4-hydroxy-naphthalimide derivative have been reported
as an efficient two-photon platform for designing two-photon probes
with its tunable two-photon properties because of the hydroxyl group
from 690 nm to 1020 nm with pulse duration of less than 100 fs and a
repetition rate of 80.5 MHz. The laser beam was focused onto the sam-
ples using a lens with a focus length of 3.0 cm. The emission was collect-
ed at an angle of 90° to the direction of the excitation beam to minimize
the scattering. The emission signal was directed into a CCD (Princeton
Instruments, Pixis 400B) coupled monochromator (IsoPlane160) with
an optical fiber. A 750 nm short pass filter was placed before the spec-
trometer to minimize the scattering from the excitation light. The two
photon absorption (TPA) cross section (δ) of the sample (s) at each
wavelength was calculated according to Equation (1), and rhodamine
[
10]. Herein, we used this platform further to develop a new ratiometric
2
+
two-photon fluorescent probe, Np-Pd, for Pd
ion detection and
bioimaging applications. The probe Np-Pd showed two well-separated
fluorescence emission peaks(445 nm and 550 nm), which provided a
large signal-to-background ratio of 26, and therefore high sensitivity
−
7
of the probe with a detection limit of 2.8 × 10
mol/L observed for
2
+
Pd ions. It exhibited a pronounced ratiometric signal changes as the
2
+
deprotection of aryl propargyl ethers in the presence of Pd ions, and
large tissue-imaging depths with a high resolution for ratiometric imag-
ing by TPFM.
3
B in CH OH was used as the reference (r) [12].
δ ¼ δrðSs Φr fr crÞ=ðSr Φs fs csÞ
ð1Þ
2
. Experimental
where S is the integrated fluorescence intensity, Φ is the fluorescence
quantum yield, C is the concentration of sample (s) and reference (r),
and ϕ is the collection efficiency of the experimental setup. The uncer-
tainty in the measurement of cross sections is ~15%. The detailed calcu-
lation is given in the Supplementary data (Fig. S1).
2
.1. Reagents and apparatus
Unless otherwise specified, all chemicals were obtained from com-
mercial suppliers and used without further purification. Thin layer chro-
matography (TLC) was carried out using silica gel 60 F254, and column
chromatography was conducted over silica gel (100–200mesh), both of
them were obtained from Qingdao Ocean Chemicals (Qingdao, China).
In all experiments, water used was doubly distilled and purified by a
Milli-Q system (Millipore, USA). LC-MS analyses were performed
using an Agilent 1100 HPLC/MSD spectrometer. Mass spectra were per-
formed using an LCQ Advantage ion trap mass spectrometer (Thermo
2.4. Spectrophotometric measurements
The fluorescence measurement experiments were measured in
phosphate buffer solution (10 mM) with DMSO as co-solvent solution
(H O/ DMSO = 99:1, v/v). The pH value of PBS solution used was
2
from 3.0 to 10, which was achieved by adding minimal volumes of HCl
solution or NaOH solution. The fluorescent emission spectra were re-
corded at excitation wavelength of 375 nm with emission wavelength
1
Finnigan). HNMR spectra were obtained using a Bruker DRX-400 spec-
−
3
trometer using TMS as an internal standard. All chemical shifts are re-
ported in the standard δ notation of parts per million. UV–vis
absorption spectra were recorded in 1.0 cm path length quartz cuvettes
on a Shimadzu 2450 UV–visible Spectrometer. Fluorescence measure-
ments were carried out on a F4500 fluorescence spectrometer with ex-
citation and emission slits set at 5.0 nm and 5.0 nm, respectively. The pH
was measured with a Mettler-Toledo Delta 320 pH meter.
range from 425 to 650 nm. A 1 × 10
mol/L stock solution of probe
was prepared by dissolving probe compound in DMSO. Procedure of cal-
ibration measurements with probe in the buffer with different pH
followed: 20 μL stock solution of probe and 1980 μL PBS buffer solution
with different pH were combined to afford a test solution, which
−
6
contained 1 × 10 mol/L of probe. The solutions of various testing spe-
cies were prepared from NaCl, CaCl MgSO CuCl ·H O,
Zn(NO ·6H O, using twice-distilled water with final concentrations
2
,
2
,
2
2
)
3 2
2
2
.2. Synthesis of probe molecule Np-O, and Np-Pd
of 0.0125 mol/L, as well as, glutathione (GSH), cysteine (Cys), and gluta-
mate (Glu) using twice-distilled water with final concentrations of
0.025 M. Procedure of selectivity experiments followed: for cations or
anions, 20 μL stock solution of probe, 1948 μL PBS solution (pH 7.4)
and 32 μL solution of each cation or anion were combined to afford a
Synthesis of Np-Br: 2.57 g (0.01 mol) compound 1 and 1.8 g
(
3
0.011 mol) 4-bromo aniline was dissolved in 100 mL of CH COOH,
the mixture was refluxed for 4 h, then poured into ice-water, the solid
was washed with HCl(aq.) and NaOH(aq.), respectively, and then the
gray white solid was obtained via the vacuum pump leak and dried
−
6
test solution, which contained 1 × 10 mol/L of probe and 100 μM cat-
ion or anion; for amino acids, 20 μL stock solution of probe, 1900 μL PBS
buffer solution (pH 7.4) and 80 μL solution of each amino acid were
under the vacuum oven. 1HNMR(400 MHz, d
-DMSO) δ(ppm) =
0.07 (s, 1H), 8.63–8.59 (t, J = 4 Hz, 1H), 8.35–8.26 (t, J = 18 Hz, 1H),
.03 (s, 1H), 7.76–7.74 (d, J = 4 Hz, 1H),7.56–7.54 (d, J = 4 Hz, 1H),
.48–7.39 (m, 4H), +C ESI ms = 432.3, calcd = 431.0.
6
−
6
1
8
7
combined to afford a test solution, which contained 1 × 10 mol/L of
probe and 100 μM amino acid.
According to the literature to synthesize 4-hydroxyl group naphtha-
2.5. HPLC analysis
1
6
lene imide (Np-O) [11]: Np-O: HNMR (400 MHz, d -DMSO) δ(ppm) =
1
1.97 (s, 1H), 8.59–8.53 (3H), 8.71–7.17 (6H), +C ESI ms = 368.4,
calcd = 368.2.
Synthesis of Np-Pd: 184 mg (0.5 mmol) Np-O, 138 mg (1 mmol)
CO , 118 mg (1 mmol) 3-bromoprop-1-yne, and 50 mL CH CN were
added into a round bottom flask, the mixture was reacted for 4 h at
0 °C, then poured into ice-water, the solid was washed with water
1 μM of Np-Pd in DMF (2.0 mL) and 1 μM of Np-O in buffered
(10 mM PBS, pH 7.4) DMF/ H
the control solution. The reaction solution (2.0 mL) was prepared with
5 μM Np-Pd in buffered DMF/H O solution incubated for 30 min at
2
O solution (1:99, v/v) were prepared as
K
2
3
3
2
37 °C after addition of Pd2 ions (50 eq.). An aliquot of each solution
(100 μL) was loaded onto an Inertsil ODS-3 (250 mm × Φ 4.6 mm)
C18 column (GL Sciences, Inc.) fitted on an Agilent 1260 Infinity HPLC
system, and the eluates were monitored with a photodiode array detec-
tor. Detection wavelength was kept at 330 nm, and flow rate was set at
1.0 mL/min. Milli-Q water containing 0.1% TFA (A) and MeCN (B) were
used as developing solvents. Gradient conditions were chosen as fol-
lows: 10% A and 90% B for 15 min.
+
5
three times, and then the white solid was obtained in 95% yield via
the vacuum pump leak and dried under the vacuum oven. 1HNMR
(
400 MHz, d
6
-DMSO) δ(ppm) = 8.59–8.47(m, 3H), 7.89–7.85(t, J =
8
3
Hz, 1H), 7.71–7.67(d, J = 16 Hz, 2H), 7.44–7.35(m, 4H), 5.24(s, 1H),
.33(s, 1H), +C ESI ms = 408.3, calcd = 406.2.
2
.3. Two-photon excited fluorescence measurement
2.6. Cell cytotoxic assays and imaging
The two-photon excited fluorescence was measured by using a Ti:
sapphire femtosecond oscillator (SpectraPhysics Mai Tai) as the excita-
tion source. The output laser pulses have a tunable central wavelength
The cytotoxic effects of the probe were assessed using MTT assays.
Fluorescent images of cells and tissues were obtained using Olympus