C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Figure 1. Spectral properties of a representative dendritic array of
glucosamine 5 in 20% aqueous DMSO.
Figure 2. Biodistribution of dendritic arrays of glucosamine in CA20948
pancreatic tumor-bearing mice at 24 h post-injection of the probes.
11 (207 156)]. The concentrations of solutions used for molar
absorptivity determinations ranged from 0.3 to 8 µM.
In conclusion, we have described the synthesis of novel poly-
valent molecular beacons that used a NIR carbocyanine as the inner
core. On the basis of the synthetic strategy described above, higher
generations of the polyvalent compounds are accessible. The
strategic “encapsulation” of the chromophore system in the inner
core prevents fluctuations in the spectral properties of the com-
pounds. This improves data reproducibility and enables using the
same excitation source and emission filter for the analyses of
samples by optical methods. Our preliminary in vivo results showed
enhanced uptake of the beacons in proliferating tumor cells, possibly
mediated by GLUTs. Finally, the polyvalent structural framework
could be used to amplify a variety of biological and chemical
molecular recognition interactions.
The glycolytic pathway for energy production by cells requires
delivery of glucose to the mitochondria, where it is phosphorylated
by an enzyme called hexokinase.10 Glucose transporters (GLUTs)
are responsible for channeling the carbohydrate into cells. Because
of their high energy needs, proliferating cells overexpress GLUTs
to enhance glycolysis relative to normal cells. Consequently,
radiolabeled glucose derivatives are used to detect cancers in
humans.11 Previous studies have shown that a fluorescent probe-
labeled glucosamine derivative, 2-(N-(7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3- diazol-
4-yl)amino)-2-deoxyglucose (2-NBDG), is a viable nonradioactive
method to monitor glucose transport and uptake in living cells.12
Therefore, we evaluated the retention of representative polyvalent
molecular beacons in a proliferating tumor model (CA20948) in
nude mice.
Acknowledgment. Funding for this project was provided by
Each tumor-bearing mouse received 0.1 µmol of the beacons/
kg of body weight via tail vein injection. The in vivo and ex vivo
distribution of the molecular beacons were monitored by NIR
fluorescence imaging using two collimated solid 780-nm laser
sources for excitation and a CCD camera equipped with 830-nm
interference filter to capture the fluorescence emission.4 An
advantage of the optical method is that the blood clearance profile
and the tumor uptake of the beacons can be monitored continuously
and in real time. At 24 h post-injection, the nude mice were
sacrificed. Aliquots of blood and some major organs (tumor, kidney,
muscle, kidney, and liver) were harvested and washed with
phosphate-buffered saline. The mean fluorescence count in each
tissue was determined for each compound and normalized. Negative
control studies show that the precursor dye 1 was not retained in
the tumor but accumulated in the liver at about 1 h post-injection.
On the contrary, the dendritic arrays of glucosamine were retained
in the tumor up to 24 h post-injection (Figure 2). Uptake of 6 by
the liver was slightly higher than uptake in the tumor and the
kidneys. Evaluation of the retention rate and biodistribution suggests
that compound 8 rapidly accumulated in the tumor and had the
lowest overall uptake in nontarget tissues. These preliminary results
also show that each compound can be used for different applica-
tions. For example, compound 9, which is retained in blood for
>24 h, could serve as a blood pool agent for monitoring blood
flow and imaging blood vessels.
the NSF Bioengineering Grant (BES 0119489).
Supporting Information Available: Description of synthetic
procedures, spectral characterization, and fluorescence imaging method.
This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
pubs.acs.org.
References
(1) Yordanov, A. T.; Kobayashi, H.; English, S. J.; Reijnders, K.; Milenic,
D.; Krishna, M. C.; Mitchell, J. B.; Brechbiel, M. W. J. Mater. Chem.
2003, 13, 1523-1525.
(2) Gopidas, K. R.; Whitesell, J. K.; Fox, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003,
125, 6491-6502.
(3) Sevick-Muraca, E. M.; Houston, J. P.; Gurfinkel, M. Curr. Opin. Chem.
Biol. 2002, 6, 642-650.
(4) Achilefu, S.; Dorshow, R. B.; Bugaj, J. E.; Rajagopalan, R. InVest. Radiol.
2000, 35, 479-485.
(5) Parak, W. J.; Gerion, D.; Pellegrino, T.; Zanchet, D.; Micheel, C.;
Williams, S. C.; Boudreau, R.; Le Gros, M. A.; Larabell, C. A.; Alivisatos,
A. P. Nanotechnology 2003, 14, R15-R27.
(6) Gao, X. H.; Nie, S. M. Trends Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 371-373.
(7) Wickline, S. A.; Lanza, G. M. J. Cell. Biochem. 2002, 90-97.
(8) Ye, Y.; Li, W. P.; Anderson, C. J.; Kao, J.; Nikiforovich, G. V.; Achilefu,
S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 7766-7767.
(9) Bolam, D. N.; Xie, H. F.; White, P.; Simpson, P. J.; Hancock, S. M.;
Williamson, M. P.; Gilbert, H. J. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 2468-2477.
(10) Pauwels, E. K. J.; Ribeiro, M. J.; Stoot, J. H. M. B.; McCready, V. R.;
Bourguignon, M.; Mazie`re, B. Nucl. Med. Biol. 1998, 25, 317-322.
(11) Gambhir, S. S. Nat. ReV. Cancer 2002, 2, 683-693.
(12) Yamada, K.; Nakata, M.; Horimoto, N.; Saito, M.; Matsuoka, H.; Inagaki,
N. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 22278-22283.
JA049441Z
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 126, NO. 25, 2004 7741