1
34
T.Y. Kim et al. / Molecular Catalysis 445 (2018) 133–141
ratio of acetone to propionaldehyde was proportional to the acidic
strength of a catalyst.
ing speed) for 6 h. The resultant powder was ground and sieved to
retain aggregates below 200 m prior to a use in a catalytic reaction.
The preparation of neutral lithium phosphate (N-LPO) followed
a procedure similar to that of B-LPO, except for the source of phos-
phate. First, 1.28 g of lithium hydroxide monohydrate (0.030 mol,
In contrast, lithium phosphate (Li PO , hereafter LPO)-based
3
4
catalysts were capable of producing allyl alcohol [11]. Stoichio-
metric LPO exhibited rather poor selectivity toward allyl alcohol
(
17%), but, when LPO was synthesized with the addition of other
LiOH·H O, Sigma-Aldrich) was dissolved in 10 ml of deionized
2
◦
alkali-metals (Na or K), it showed higher selectivity (∼86%) as well
water, and then the solution was heated to 60 C with stirring. The
as higher activity. In particular, Li NaPO , so-called basic lithium
solution was neutralized via the drop-wise injection of 0.7 M H PO4
2
4
3
phosphate (B-LPO), showed the best performance. The LPO cata-
lysts that contained alkali metals possessed stronger basic sites
and weaker acidic sites than the stoichiometric LPO, which indi-
cated that basic sites are essential for the formation of allyl alcohol.
The authors also performed reaction tests by titrating acidic or basic
sites with pyridine or dichloroacetic acid, respectively, and thereby
found that both acidity and basicity were required for the formation
of allyl alcohol.
aqueous solution with vigorous stirring. The neutralized solution
was aged for 24 h at 60 C. The remaining procedures were iden-
tical to those for B-LPO preparation: filtration, washing, drying,
calcination, and grinding.
◦
2.2. Catalytic activity tests
Catalytic reactions for the isomerization of trans-2,3-
Zhong et al. reported a similar tendency whereby basic LPO
showed a catalytic performance that was higher than that of stoi-
chiometric LPO [12]. They also studied the effect of precursors for
lithium, sodium, and phosphate on the morphology and catalytic
properties of basic LPO [13]. Lithium hydroxide and sodium phos-
phate were more appropriate precursors, as the synthesized LPO
showed higher performance thanks to a crystallinity and a surface
area that was better and higher, respectively, than that of the others
tested.
Previous studies helped explain the isomerization of epoxides in
terms of acid-base catalysis. However, no studies regarding surface
structures and the roles of the surface moieties have been per-
formed, which limits a fundamental understanding of the catalysis
in the reaction. The identification of active surface structures would
be helpful to design improved catalyst for this reaction.
Herein, we rationally identified the active surface of an LPO cat-
alyst for the isomerization of EB to BO, and proposed the roles of the
surface moieties during catalysis. Basic and neutral lithium phos-
phates (B-LPO and N-LPO, respectively) were compared to identify
characteristics of the active catalytic materials. We performed
several experiments including catalytic activity tests, structural
characterization, and acidic-basic characterization. Based on the
experimental evidences, theoretical DFT calculations were carried
out to identify the active surface of LPO. The presence of the iden-
tified active surface was also confirmed via FT-IR analyses. Finally,
the roles of the surface moieties on the active surface structure were
proposed, based on the optimized geometry for adsorption of EB.
These results will be helpful in the design and synthesis of more
active catalysts for these types of reactions.
epoxybutane (hereafter EB, purchased from Alfa Aesar (97%))
were performed on a fixed-bed quartz reactor with a thermocou-
ple well. A K-type thermocouple was placed on the thermocouple
well to measure the reaction temperature, and the reactor was
externally heated using an electric furnace. A varied amount of
catalyst (3–50 mg) was used in the catalytic reaction to main-
tain a conversion level lower than 20%. The reactor was heated
◦
to the desired temperatures with a ramping rate of 10 C/min
and was maintained for 30 min with a flow of dry N (99.999%,
2
−
1
3
0 cm3 min ). An aqueous solution of the reactant was then
injected using a liquid syringe pump (Cole-Palmer 74900 series)
◦
into a pre-heating zone, which was maintained at 200 C. The
values for the concentration of the reactant solution and dry
N2 flow rate were varied to control the partial pressure of H O
2
(
0–62 kPa) while maintaining other conditions in a constant
state: total flow rate (51 sccm) and the partial pressure of EB
0.9 kPa). In the reaction condition, there were no mass transfer
(
limitations (Mears criterion for external mass transfer limitation,
and Weisz-Prater criterion for internal mass transfer limitation;
see Supporting information). Product gases were cooled using
a helix-type condenser, and liquefied contents were collected
hourly in a sample tube containing deionized water. Acetonitrile
was used as an external standard for quantification. The products
were analyzed using gas chromatography (Younglin ACME 6100
®
instrument) equipped with a FID detector and an Rtx -VRX capil-
lary column (Restek, cat. # 19316). The data acquired after 2 h of
reaction time were used to compare the activity of the catalysts.
2.3. Characterization
High-resolution transmission electron micrograph (HR-TEM)
2
. Experimental and theoretical methods
images were obtained using a JEOL JEM-3010 microscope with an
acceleration voltage of 300 kV. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) pat-
terns were obtained using a Rigaku D-MAX2500-PC powder X-ray
diffractometer with Cu K␣ radiation (1.5406 Å) in an operating
mode of 50 kV and 100 mA. The crystallite sizes were calculated
based on peaks at 16.8 ((010) plane) and 36.9 ((002) plane) using
the Scherrer equation. N2 adsorption-desorption analyses were
carried out using a Micromeritics ASAP-2010 instrument. The spe-
cific BET surface area was calculated at P/Po = 0.1–0.2.
2.1. Preparation of catalysts
Basic lithium phosphate (B-LPO) was prepared via precipi-
◦
◦
tation. First, 1.82 g of sodium phosphate monobasic (0.015 mol,
NaH PO , Sigma-Aldrich) and 1.28 g of lithium hydroxide mono-
2
4
hydrate (0.030 mol, LiOH·H O, Sigma-Aldrich) were separately
2
dissolved in 15 ml and 10 ml of deionized water, respectively. The
former solution (NaH PO ) was transferred to a 100 ml round-
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed on a
KRATOS AXIS electron spectrometer with Mg K␣ radiation. The
binding energies were corrected using C 1s as an internal standard
(284.5 eV). The peaks were fitted by mixed Gaussian-Lorentzian
functions (10% Lorentzian) with subtraction of the Shirley-type
background using a XPS peak-fitting program (XPSPEAK 4.1). The
2
4
◦
bottom flask, and was then heated to 40 C with stirring. The
aqueous solution of LiOH·H O was then added drop-wise with vig-
2
orous stirring. A white precipitate was immediately formed when
the solution was added. After complete injection of the solution,
◦
the mixed solution was aged for 24 h at 40 C. The white precip-
7
31
itates were isolated on a filter, washed three times with 200 ml
of de-ionized water, and dried overnight at 343 K. Calcination of
the dried precipitates was conducted at 673 K (5 K/min of ramp-
Li and P magic angle spinning (MAS) nuclear magnetic resonance
(NMR) spectra of the samples were recorded on a Bruker AVANCE
400 WB (400 MHz) spectrometer operated at frequencies of 156