J . Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 2407-2409
2407
Sch em e 1
Mod ifica tion of th e Sw er n Oxid a tion : Use
of a Solu ble P olym er -Bou n d , Recycla ble,
a n d Od or less Su lfoxid e
J oanna M. Harris, Yaoquan Liu, Shengyong Chai,
Mark D. Andrews, and J ohn C. Vederas*
Department of Chemistry, University of Alberta,
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2G2
Received December 22, 1997
The Swern procedure, using oxalyl chloride activation
of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), is one of the most widely
used methods of oxidizing primary and secondary alco-
hols to aldehydes and ketones.1 Although very effective,
this process produces the unpleasant-smelling, volatile
(bp 37 °C) byproduct, dimethyl sulfide. We have previ-
ously reported the use of 6-(methylsulfinyl)hexanoic acid
(2) as an efficient substitute for DMSO in Swern oxida-
tion reactions.2 This modification generates the non-
volatile sulfide 1, which is easily separable from the
reaction mixture by extraction or filtration through silica
gel. Also described was preliminary work on the attach-
ment of 2 to commercial chloromethyl polystyrene beads
(Merrifield resin) to form a polymer-bound reagent 3
(Scheme 1). The present study expands on these inves-
tigations and reports the attachment of 2 to soluble
poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) supports to form polymer-
bound reagents that can be easily removed from the
reaction mixture by precipitation and filtration. After
use in the Swern procedure, the PEG-bound reagent can
be readily recycled by periodate oxidation, with no
observable loss of oxidation capacity.
Initial studies on supports to bear the sulfoxide func-
tionality necessary for Swern oxidation focused on in-
soluble solid-phase polymers such as Merrifield resin.
Use of a 2-fold excess of polymer-supported sulfoxide 3
in the Swern process quantitatively oxidizes endo-borneol
to camphor, with no residual acohol remaining. However,
after regeneration by sodium metaperiodate oxidation,3
the oxidation capacity of the polymer-bound reagent is
reduced from 92% to 78%. This may be due to cross-
linking of the polystyrene backbone by reaction with
oxalyl chloride. Clearly, if the reagent is to be recyclable,
the polymer-support must be inert to the reaction condi-
tions for both the Swern oxidation and periodate regen-
eration of the sulfoxide functionality. A rapidly expand-
ing area of polymer-supported chemistry is the use of
soluble scaffolds.4 These have the advantage of forming
a homogeneous phase in the reaction medium, but having
polymeric properties that simplify product separation and
reagent recovery. One of the most versatile and widely
used polymer supports for such liquid-phase synthesis
is poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG).5 PEG is soluble in a wide-
range of organic solvents and water, thereby facilitating
homogeneous reaction, but is insoluble in hexane, diethyl
ether, and tert-butyl methyl ether.6 It is therefore easily
separated from the reaction mixture by precipitation and
filtration.
When choosing a polymer for liquid-phase synthesis a
compromise must be made between loading capacity and
solubility. PEG is commercially available in a range of
molecular weights up to 20 000; those between 2 000 and
20 000 are crystalline with loading capacities between 1
and 0.1 mmol/g, whereas the lower molecular weight
PEG’s exist as liquids at room temperature. A number
of different size PEG’s (with hydroxyl functionalities at
both ends) and MeO-PEG’s (with the polyether termi-
nated by a methoxy group at one end and a free hydroxyl
at the other) were investigated in an attempt to optimize
the reaction conditions and loading capacity. Reagent 2
is easily coupled to PEG in the presence of DCC and
DMAP.7 The reduced sulfide acid 1 can be similarly
coupled and subsequently oxidized to the sulfoxide 5 with
sodium metaperiodate (Scheme 2).3 Although they have
higher loading capacities, the low molecular weight
(below 2 000) liquid polymers present problems with
* Tel (403)-492-5475. FAX (403)-492-8231. e-mail: J ohn.Vederas@
ualberta.ca.
(1) (a) Mancuso, A. J .; Swern, D. Synthesis 1981, 165-185. (b)
Mancuso, A. J .; Huang, S.-L.; Swern, D. J . Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 2480-
2482. (c) Omura, K.; Swern, D. Tetrahedron 1978, 34, 1651-1660. (d)
Mancuso, A. J .; Brownfain, D. S.; Swern, D. J . Org. Chem. 1979, 44,
4148-4150.
(2) Liu, Y.; Vederas, J . C. J . Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 7856-7859.
(3) (a) Leonard, N. J .; J ohnson, C. R. J . Org. Chem. 1962, 27, 282-
284. (b) J ohnson, C. R.; Keiser, J . E. Organic Syntheses, Wiley: New
York, 1973; Collect. Vol. 5, pp 791-793.
(4) Gravert, D. J .; J anda, K. D. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 489-509 and
references therein.
(5) (a) Han, H.; Wolfe, M. M.; Brenner, S.; J anda, K. D. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1995, 92, 6419-6423. (b) Han, H.; J anda, K. D. J .
Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 7632-7633.
(6) Harris, J . M. In Poly(Ethylene Glycol) Chemistry: Biotechnical
and Biomedical Applications; Harris, J . M., Ed.; Plenum Press: New
York, 1992.
(7) Han, H.; J anda, K. D. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 2539-2544.
S0022-3263(97)02304-9 CCC: $15.00 © 1998 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 03/10/1998