562 Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. Vol. 80, No. 3 (2007)
Photochemistry of New Benzoxazole Derivatives
CH=N), 7.32 (1H, d, J ¼ 7:4 Hz, ArH), 7.21–7.10 (2H, m, ArH),
7.02–6.93 (2H, m, ArH), 6.55–6.53 (2H, m, ArH), 5.87 (1H, brs,
OH), 3.86 (3H, s, CH3). Anal. Calcd for C14H13NO3: C, 69.12; H,
5.93; N, 5.76%. Found: C, 69.15; H, 5.47; N, 5.63%.
2-(3-Methoxy-2-hydroxyphenyl)benzoxazole (3-MHBO): A
mixture of 1 (198 mg, 0.814 mmol) and DDQ (430 mg, 1.89
mmol) in chloroform was stirred for 2 h at room temperature
(Scheme 1). After evaporation to remove solvent, the residue
was purified by silica-gel column chromatography (hexane/ethyl
acetate = 10/1 to 100% ethyl acetate) followed by recrystalliza-
tion from ethyl acetate to give a white solid (82 mg, 42%).
1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, Me4Si) ꢁ 11.70 (1H, s, OH), 7.77–
7.75 (1H, m, ArH), 7.65 (1H, d, J ¼ 8:0 Hz, ArH), 7.63–7.60 (1H,
m, ArH), 7.41–7.37 (2H, m, ArH), 7.05 (1H, d, J ¼ 8:0 Hz, ArH),
6.97 (1H, t, J ¼ 8:0 Hz, ArH), 3.97 (3H, s, CH3). Anal. Calcd for
C14H11NO3: C, 69.70; H, 4.60; N, 5.81%. Found: C, 69.55; H,
4.93; N, 5.88%.
Scheme 1.
2-(4-Methoxy-2-hydroxyphenyl)benzoxazole (4-MHBO):10
A mixture of 2 (211 mg, 0.868 mmol) and DDQ (203 mg, 0.895
mmol) in chloroform was stirred for 2 h at room temperature
(Scheme 1). After evaporation to remove the solvent, the residue
was purified by silica-gel column chromatography (hexane/ethyl
acetate = 10/1 to 100% ethyl acetate) followed by recrystalliza-
tion from ethyl acetate to give a white solid (45 mg, 22%).
1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, Me4Si) ꢁ 11.64 (1H, s, OH), 7.92
(1H, d, J ¼ 8:8 Hz, ArH), 7.70–7.67 (1H, m, ArH), 7.59–7.56
(1H, m, ArH), 7.37–7.34 (2H, m, ArH), 6.64–6.58 (2H, m, ArH),
3.87 (3H, s, CH3).
Measurements.
1H NMR spectra were measured with a
1
Bruker ARX-400 (400 MHz for H NMR) and Bruker AVANCE
500 (125 MHz for 13C NMR) spectrometer in solution of CDCl3
with tetramethylsilane as an internal standard. UV absorption
and fluorescence spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu UV-1600
UV–visible spectrophotometer and on a Hitachi F-4500 fluores-
cence spectrometer, respectively. Fluorescence lifetimes were de-
termined with Horiba NAES-1100 time-resolved spectrofluorom-
eter. Laser flash photolysis was performed by using an excimer la-
ser (Lambda Physik LPX-100, 308 nm, 20 ns fwhm) as excitation
light sources, and a pulsed xenon arc (Ushio UXL-159) was used
as a monitoring light source. A photomultiplier (Hamamatsu
R-928) and a storage oscilloscope (Iwatsu TS-123) were used
for the detection.
Fig. 2. UV absorption spectra of 3-MHBO (a) and 4-
MHBO (b) in benzene, acetonitrile, and ethanol.
Results and Discussion
Steady-State Absorption Spectra. The shapes of the ab-
sorption spectra of 4-MHBO resemble those of the parent
compound HBO,11 whereas those of 3-MHBO were different
from those of 4-MHBO or HBO. Figure 2 shows the steady-
state absorption spectra of 3-MHBO and 4-MHBO, measured
in benzene, acetonitrile, and ethanol. For 4-MHBO (Fig. 2b),
the absorption band around 330–340 nm was assigned to the
syn-enol form, and the absorption around 319–323 nm are
due to anti-enol form.12 The absorption spectrum of 3-MHBO
(Fig. 2a) is more complex.
The difference in the absorption spectra is obviously a con-
sequence of the methoxy group at the 30-position in 3-MHBO,
which changes the electronic structure, as seen from a com-
parison of the NMR spectra. In 1H NMR spectra, the peak cor-
responding to the methoxy hydrogen (methoxy-H) appeared
at 3.97 and 3.87 ppm for 3- and 4-MHBO, respectively. On
the other hand, the hydrogen at 60-position (60-H) appeared
Fig. 3. Hydrogen bonds in 3- and 4-MHBO.
at 7.65 and 7.92 ppm for 3- and 4-MHBO, respectively
(Fig. 3). The downfield shift of methoxy-H (0.10 ppm) and
the upfield shift of 60-H (0.27 ppm) in 3-MHBO suggests that:
1) a hydrogen bond between the neighboring hydroxy groups
at 20-position formed and 2) mesomeric effect (electron-donat-
ing effect) of 30-methoxy group on 60-H. These effects on the
electronic structure probably cause the considerable difference
in the absorption spectra of 3-MHBO.