meric alkynylallenes 2 which result from an undesired
nucleophilic attack by the acetylenic copper species at the
triple bond (SN2′) rather than at the sp3 carbon of the
electrophile (pathways A and B, respectively, in Scheme 1).
the Csp-aluminum σ bond, as well as the propargylic
Csp -leaving group bond, as a consequence of the proposed
complexation shown in Scheme 2.
3
Scheme 2. 1,4-Diynes via Mutual Activation of Alkynylalanes
and Propargylic Electrophiles
Scheme 1. Competitive Reactions Involved in the Formation
of 1,4-Skipped Diynes 1
In analogy, Hooz et al.15 also invoke such aluminum
complexes to explain the different regioselective outcomes
of alkynylalane additions to R,â-unsaturated endo- and
exocyclic ketones as shown in Scheme 3.
In turn, these allenic products are prone to polymerization.
Second, undesired isomerization of the 1,4-diyne 1 to the
corresponding allenes and eventually the 1,3-isomer is pos-
sible even under the weakly basic conditions, thus lowering
the yield and complicating the isolation of the skipped
diynes.12 Finally, the acetylenic copper species can be prone
to oxidative homocoupling (pathway C, Scheme 1).13
During the course of our work devoted to alternative
approaches to skipped 1,4-diynes which address the afore-
mentioned limitations of copper(I)-mediated couplings, we
have recently reported a method obviating the use of base
which employs a bimetallic silicon-copper system.14 Herein,
we present the first use of alkynylalanes for the preparation
of methylene-bridged 1,4-diynes via their cross-coupling with
Scheme 3. Regioselectivity of the Addition of Alkynylalane
to R,â-Unsaturated Ketones
The alkynylalane adds to give the 1,4-Michael addition
product in acyclic systems, but in conformationally restricted
systems such as cyclohexenylethanone and cyclohexenone,
only the R,â-unsaturated ketone which is able to adopt a
cisoid conformation in the transition state complex leads to
a 1,4-Michael adduct.16
A differentiation should be made between these types of
mutual complexation couplings and those between alanes and
allylic,17 benzylic,18 and tertiary19 electrophiles considered
to proceed by a cationic SN1 mechanism which, through a
lack of stabilization (as well as a lack of regioisomers),20
would be implausible here.
For the preparation of our base-sensitive diynes (vide
supra), it was preferable to avoid the use of strongly basic
transmetalation methods (alkynyl-alkali metal-Al exchange)
commonly applied for the generation of the requisite alky-
nylalane species21 (pathway A in Scheme 4).
3
a selection of propargylic electrophiles. This novel Csp-Csp
bond-forming reaction relies on the sole use of a mono-
metallic aluminum-alkynyl species and thereby circumvents
the ubiquitous need for copper in such cross-coupling
reactions.
The origin of this work rests on the expectation that if an
alkynylalane is generated in the presence of a propargylic
electrophile capable of complexing with the Lewis acid
aluminum species a coupling reaction could ensue and lead
to the formation of a skipped diyne. The successful trans-
fer of the alkynyl residue would rely in part on weakening
(11) (a) Brandsma, L. Synthesis of Acetylenes, Allenes and Cumulenes;
Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2003 and references therein. (b) Jeffery, T.; Guenot,
S.; Linstrumelle, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 5757. (c) Hansen, T. V.;
Stenstrom, Y. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2001, 12, 1407. (d) Spinella, A.;
Caruso, T.; Martino, M.; Sessa, C. Synlett 2001, 1971. (e) For an
exception: Padmanabhan, S.; Nicholas, K. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24,
2239.
(12) (a) Mel’nikova, V. I.; Pivnitskii, K. K. Zh. Neorg. Khim. 1990, 26,
78. (b) Mathai, I. M.; Taniguchi, H.; Miller, S. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967,
89, 115. (c) Hungerford, N. L.; Kitching, W. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
1 1998, 1839.
(13) (a) Trost, B. M.; Fleming, I. ComprehensiVe Organic Synthesis;
Pergamon: Oxford, 1991; Vol. 5, p 1543. (b) Bohlmann, F.; Schoenowsky,
H.; Inhoffen, E.; Grau, G. Chem. Ber. 1964, 97, 794.
(14) Montel, F.; Beaudegnies, R.; Kessabi, J.; Martin, B.; Muller, E.;
Wendeborn, S.; Jung, P. M. J. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1905.
(15) Hooz, J.; Layton, R. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971, 93, 7320.
(16) This limitation can be overcome indirectly by employing a nickel
catalyst: (a) Schwartz, J.; Carr, D. B.; Hansen, R. T.; Dayrit., F. M. J.
Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 3053. (b) Kwak., Y.-S.; Corey, E. J. Org. Lett. 2004,
6, 3385.
(17) (a) Trost, B. M.; Ghadiri, M. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 1098.
(b) Gallina, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 519.
(18) Miller, D. B. J. Org. Chem. 1966, 31, 908.
(19) Negishi, E.; Baba, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 7385.
(20) Flemming, S.; Kabbara, J.; Nickisch, K.; Westermann, J.; Mohr, J.
Synlett 1995, 183.
5630
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 24, 2006