Inorganic Chemistry
Article
was proved by the DLS results, in which the average
hydrodynamic diameters (Dh) were measured to be 16, 24,
32, 122, and 164 nm with 10%, 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% H2O,
respectively (Figure 2b). Tetraphenylethene (TPE) is a typical
aggregation-induced emission (AIE) luminogen, which is
nonemissive in solution but shows intense emission in
aggregated state. Unexpectedly, complex S exhibited weak
emission in aggregated state. Complex S possesses a rigid 3D
structure by complexing with metal ions to form a nanobelt.
We speculated that such rigid 3D structure of complex S
hinders compact packing and the conformation of TPE units
might not be intensely affected even in aggregated state, as a
result to negligible AIE phenomenon.23,24
Tpy-Cd complexes were unstable and prone to disassemble
to tpy ligands under alkaline conditions or S2− existing due to
the formation of insoluble cadmium salt. Based on this fact,
herein, the aggregates of complex S were explored as a
fluorescence turn-on sensor responsive to S2−. Initially,
fluorescence turn-on experiments were performed in
CH3CN/H2O (v/v, 1/9) mixture, but the fluorescence
intensity could not be accurately measured due to the fact
that obvious precipitates were formed after adding analysts
(Figure S17). Thus, the complex S in CH3CN/H2O (v/v, 1/1)
mixture was chosen as the experimental subject, and the
volume of each experiment was 2.0 mL. As described in Figure
4a, after 4.0 μmol of various salts (KBr, KI, KNO3, Na2SO4,
NaCl, NH4Cl, NH4BF4, CH3COOK, NaHCO3, Na2CO3,
Na2S) was added to aggregates in CH3CN/H2O (v/v,1/1),
complex S showed a specific emission enhancement response
to alkali salt (CH3COOK, NaHCO3, Na2CO3) and Na2S.
Corresponding fluorescent emission spectroscopies showed a
16-, 45-, 31-, and 51-fold enhancement for analyst CH3COOK,
NaHCO3, Na2CO3, and Na2S, respectively. In contrast, no
obvious fluorescence enhancement was found from other
analysts, and the slight emission increase for Br−, Cl−, and I−
was probably resulting from further aggregation via partly
disassembly lead by halogen ions coordination (Figure 4b).25
Such results were supported by the UV−vis spectroscopies, in
Figure 4. Fluorescence responses of complex S in 2 mL of CH3CN/
H2O at 298 K (v/v, 1/1; c = 7.04 × 10−6 M): (a) the photographs (λex
= 365 nm) and (b) the relative fluorescence intensity of after and
before addition of 4.0 μmol interfering species; c) fluorescence
spectra after adding different concentrations of Na2S (λex = 320 nm;
slit width: ex = 5 nm, em = 5 nm).
−
2−
coeffucients (ε) of 2.57 × 105 M−1 cm−1 and two distinct
absorption bands at ∼322 and ∼334 nm (Figure 3b), which
are assigned to intraligand charge transfer (ILCT).21 To
further research the light-emitting behavior of ligand L and
assembled nanobelt S, the UV−vis and fluorescence spectra
were determined in mixed solvent with the different fraction of
poor solvent. As shown in Figure 3c, Figure 3e, and Figure S13,
the ligand L displayed weak luminescence in CHCl3 and there
was no obvious change with gradually increasing methanol or
hexane fraction from 10% to 70% due to its solubility;
however, the fluorescence intensities displayed obvious
enhancement with 90% CH3OH or hexane fraction. As we
expected, such result was attributed to the AIE effect of TPE-
containing L. As observed from Figure 3a and Figure S12, the
formation of aggregates with 90% CH3OH or hexane was
verified by the decrease of high-energy bands at 283 nm and
increase of low-energy tailing bands in the absorption spectra
due to the π−π stacking interactions.22 Moving to complex S,
which was nonluminescent in dilute CH3CN, just a slight
emission enhancement was observed with gradually increasing
methanol or water fraction from 10% to 90% (Figure S15,
Figure 3d, and Figure 3f). Surely, as observed from Figure 3f,
the aggregates were obviously formed with 90% water,
supported by the UV−vis spectra in which a similar change
to the ligand was observed. Further, the aggregates forming
which no considerable change was observed for NO3 , SO4
,
and BF4− and where there was a decrease of high-energy bands
at 283 nm and an increase of low-energy tailing bands for Br−,
Cl−, and I− (Figure S18). Further, the characteristic ILCT
band around 330 nm was still observed for other analysts;
however, it disappeared for NaHCO3, Na2CO3, and Na2S,
demonstrating that complex S was disassembled to ligands
(Figure S18). Further, the 1H NMR spectra displayed that the
signals assigned to complex S fully disappeared and that the
ligand L was formed after adding Na2S, suggesting that Na2S
was able to disassemble the complex to form the ligands
As displayed in Figure S23, time-dependent fluorescence
spectra of complex S with excess S2− (4.0 umol) were recorded
in 2.0 mL of CH3CN/H2O (1/1, v/v). As the reaction
proceeded, the emission at 494 nm rapidly increased before 90
s elapsed. From 90 to 1100 s, the rate of fluorescence
enhancement gradually decreases to close to 0 over time
(Figure S24). Further, the concentration-dependent fluores-
cence enhancement was determined by fluorescence titration
experiments (Figure 4c). Upon the progressive addition of
Na2S to complex S in 2.0 mL of CH3CN/H2O (1/1, v/v), the
fluorescence intensity at 494 nm gradually increased. There
was good linearity between the fluorescence intensity and the
concentration of the Na2S in the 0−1.0 × 10−3 M range
D
Inorg. Chem. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX