10.1002/ejoc.202000442
European Journal of Organic Chemistry
FULL PAPER
obtained on an FP-8500 (JASCO) spectrometer and the absolute PL
quantum yields (Φ) were determined by using a JASCO ILFC-847S; the
quantum yield of quinine sulfate as reference was 0.52, which is in
agreement with the literature value.[18] Emission lifetimes were measured
by using a Quantaurus-Tau (Hamamatsu Photonics, Shizuoka, Japan)
instrument.
and the mixture was stirred for 2 h. The reaction was quenched by the
addition of distilled water, and the organic layers were extracted with
CH2Cl2. The combined organic layers were dried over Na2SO4, and after
filtration, the volatiles were removed in vacuo. The crude product was
purified by column chromatography on alumina (eluent: hexane). The
solvents were removed in vacuo and the residue was subjected to
recrystallization (slow mixing of a solution of the product in CH2Cl2 with
MeOH at ambient temperature) to obtain 1 as colorless crystals (0.17 g,
0.54 mmol, 30ꢀ%). 1H NMR (acetone-d6, 400 MHz): δ = 7.70 (s, 4ꢀH),
7.39–7.37 (m, 2ꢀH), 7.26–7.24 ppm (m, 3ꢀH); 13C{1H} NMR (acetone-d6,
100 MHz): δ = 148.2, 143.8, 141.4, 131.3, 128.6, 128.3, 126.4, 130.3,
115.6 ppm; HR-FAB-MS: m/z calcd for C14H9AsS2: 315.9362 [M]+; found:
315.9357.
X-ray crystallographic data for single crystalline products
The single crystal was mounted on a nylon loop. Intensity data were
collected at room temperature on a Rigaku XtaLAB mini with graphite-
monochromated MoKα radiation. The readout was performed in the 0.073
mm pixel mode. The data were collected at room temperature to a
maximum 2θ value of 55.0°. Data were processed by Crystal Clear.[19] An
empirical absorption correction[20] was applied. The data were corrected
for Lorentz and polarization effects. The structure was solved by direct
methods[21] and expanded by using Fourier techniques. The non-
hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. Hydrogen atoms were
refined by using the riding model. The final cycle of the full-matrix least-
squares refinement on F2 was based on observed reflections and
variable parameters. All calculations were performed by using the
CrystalStructure[21] crystallographic software package except for the
refinement, which was performed by using SHELXL2013.[22] Crystal data
and more information on the X-ray data collection are summarized in
Tables S1 and S2. CCDC 1993056 (1) contains the supplementary
crystallographic data for this paper. These data are provided free of
charge by The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre.
Acknowledgments
The work in KIT was supported by JSPS KAKENHI, grant
Number 19H04577 (Coordination Asymmetry), to HI as well as
by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (No. 18K04864)
from JSPS for TY. The work in Hokkaido was supported by a
Grant-in-Aid for grant numbers 17K14467, 19H04556,
18H04497, and 18H02041.
Keywords: hetero[5]radialene • arsole • DFT calculation •
aromaticity • phosphorescence
Cyclic voltammetric (CV) analyses
CV analyses were carried out on an ECstat-300 (EC Frontier, Inc.)
Potentio/Galvanostat Analyzer at a scan rate of 100 mV s−1. All the
[1]
[2]
G. Maas in Cross Conjugation: Modern Dendralene, Radialene and
Fulvene Chemistry (Eds.: H. Hopf, M. S. Sherburn), Wiley-VCH,
Weinheim, 2016, pp. 79-116.
measurements were performed in THF containing 0.1
M
tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate at ambient temperature using
a three-electrode system, with each solution being purged with N2 prior to
measurement. The working electrode was a glassy carbon, the counter
electrode was a platinum wire, and the reference electrode was an
Ag0/Ag+ electrode.
E. G. Mackay, C. G. Newton, H. Toombs-Ruane, E. J. Lindeboom, T.
Fallon, A. C. Willis, M. N. Paddon-Row, M. S. Sherburn, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2015, 137, 14653.
[3]
[4]
E. A. Dorko, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 5518.
(a) G. W. Griffin, L. I. Peterson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1962, 84, 3398. (b)
G. W. Griffin, L. I. Peterson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963, 85, 2268.
A. J. Barkovich, E. S. Strauss, K. P. C. Vollhardt, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1977, 99, 8321.
Computational detail
DFT calculations were carried out to investigate the frontier orbitals and
the NICS values. In addition, the HOMO–LUMO transition energies (ΔE),
their oscillator strengths (f), and the energy levels of the singlet (Sn) and
triplet (Tn) excited states were estimated by TD-DFT calculations. The
calculations of the frontier orbital energies and the electron transition
energies employed B3LYP/6-31G+(d,p) set combinations by using the
Gaussian 16 program package.[14] The NICS values were calculated at
the GIAO-B3LYP/6-311G+(d,p) level of theory. The Sn and Tn states
were calculated at the B3LYP/6-31G(d) for C, H, S and SDD for As. For
analyses on Diels-Alder dimerization of 1, B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) calculations
were employed to obtain local minima and transition states in the
reaction. Harmonic vibrational frequencies were systematically computed
to confirm that each optimized geometry corresponds to a local minimum
that has only real frequencies or a saddle point that has only one
imaginary frequency. Lengths of bonds in B3LYP-optimized structure of 1
are fully consistent with those obtained from X-ray analyses (Figure 3),
indicating this level of theory is accurate enough to study properties of
hetero[5]radialene species.
[5]
[6]
(a) T. Sugimoto, Y. Misaki, Z. Yoshida, J. Yamauchi, Mol. Cryst. Liq.
Cryst. 1989, 176, 259. (b) K. Kano, T. Sugimoto, Y. Misaki, T. Enoki, H.
Hatakeyama, H. Oka, Y. Hosotani, Z. Yoshida, J. Phys. Chem. 1994,
98, 252.
[7]
[8]
S. Inaoka, D. M. Collard, J. Mater. Chem. 1999, 9, 1719. (b) T. Ohmae,
T. Nishinaga, M. Wu, M. Iyoda, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 1066. (c)
T. Higashino, A. Kumagai, H. Imahori, Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 5091.
(d) T. Nishinaga, S. Shiroma, Masashi Hasegawa, Org. Lett. 2018, 20,
3426.
(a) I. Miyahara, A. Hayashi, K. Hirotsu, M. Yoshifuji, H. Yoshimura, K.
Toyota, Polyhedron 1992, 11, 385. (b) W. Brieden, T. Kellersohn, Chem.
Ber. 1993, 126, 845. (c) A. Mahieu, Y. Miquel, A. Igau, B. Donnadieu,
J.-P. Majoral, Organometallics 1997, 16, 3086. (d) C. M. D. Komen, C.
J. Horan, S. Krill, G. M. Gray, M. Lutz, A. L. Spek, A. W. Ehlers, K.
Lammertsma, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 12507.
[9]
(a) T. Higashino, H. Imahori, Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 13375; (b) T.
Higashino, K. Ishida, T. Satoh, Y. Matano, H. Imahori, J. Org. Chem.
2018, 83, 3397.
Synthesis
[10] (a) T. Kato, H. Imoto, S. Tanaka, M. Ishidoshiro, K. Naka, Dalton Trans.
2016, 45, 11338. (b) H. Imoto, I. Kawashima, C. Yamazawa, S. Tanaka,
K. Naka, J. Mater. Chem. C 2017, 5, 6697.
4-Phenyldithieno[3,4-b:3’,4’-d]arsole (1): To a solution of 4,4’-dibromo-
3,3’-bithiophene (0.59 g, 1.8 mmol) in THF (14 mL), a solution of n-BuLi
(1.6ꢀM, 1.0 mL, 1.6 mmol) in hexane was added slowly with a syringe at
−100 °C under N2 atmosphere, and the mixture was stirred for 1 h. To the
solution, a mixture of hexaphenylcyclohexaarsine (0.34 g, 0.38 mmol)
and I2 (0.56 g, 2.2 mmol) in THF (26 mL) was added slowly at −100 °C
[11] T, Kato, S. Tanaka, K. Naka, Chem. Lett. 2015, 44, 1476.
[12] (a) H. Imoto, Polym. J. 2018, 50, 837. (b) H. Imoto, K. Naka, Chem. Eur.
J. 2019, 25, 1883.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.