Journal of the American Chemical Society
Article
inherently less electrophilic than their aldehyde counterparts as
a result of their four inductively donating alkyl substituents.
With these limitations in mind and the overarching goal of
developing a method for the synthesis of all-alkyl ATAEs, we
reasoned that combining the use of primary amines with more
electrophilic α-ketoesters and an activating Brønsted acid
might circumvent the reactivity problems precluding our
inability to add alkyl radicals to ketiminium ions (Figure 2B).
Imine formation (to Int I) and subsequent addition of the alkyl
radical (formed from alkyl iodide via visible-light-mediated
initiation) should be promoted in this design plan.
Furthermore, the hydridic (Me3Si)3Si−H would be polarity-
matched to the unstabilized and, hence, reactive secondary N-
alkyl aminium radical cation (ARC, Int II) emanating from the
addition step, enabling a favorable HAT to form the product.
Investigations to form N-alkyl ATAEs began by employing
the reaction conditions that had proved successful in our
previously reported visible-light-mediated carbonyl alkylative
amination protocol.17 Surprisingly, visible-light irradiation of a
reaction deploying (Me3Si)3Si−H, TBS−OTf, and 4 Å
molecular sieves to combine butylamine 1a, α-ketoester 2a,
and isopropyl iodide 3a failed to produce any of the desired
product (Table 1, entry 1); modest reaction was observed on
(Me3Si)3Si−H in orchestrating a successful reaction is likely
linked to its ability to perform a kinetically and thermodynami-
cally favored HAT to the reactive secondary N-alkyl aminium
radical cation (Figure 2B, Int II) and contrasts with previously
reported radical additions to activated imine derivatives
adorned with auxiliary groups, which consequently stabilize
the corresponding aminium radical cation and require more
forcing conditions to terminate the process. As such, a visible-
light-enabled carbonyl alkylative amination to all-alkyl-ATAEs
using (Me3Si)3Si−H obviates the need for auxiliary groups on
the nitrogen atom of the imine electrophile and is directly
responsible for the mild and straightforward conditions that
lead to a successful reaction.
Equipped with a set of optimized reaction conditions, the
scope of the carbonyl alkylative amination to all-alkyl ATAEs
was first explored by varying the amine component using α-
ketoester 2a and isopropyl iodide 3a as representative coupling
partners. A variety of primary amines, containing a range of
different structural and functional features, were found to be
highly effective in the reaction (Figure 3, 4a−4r). In addition
to deployment of butylamine 1a, the primary amine
component could incorporate cyclic hydrocarbon substituents
with the reaction providing good yields throughout (4b−4f).
Amines with linear substituents displaying cyclopropyl, benzyl
and distal electron rich arene and heteroarenes, ether, and
acetal features produced the all-alkyl ATAEs in good to
moderate yields (4i−4n). The benzylamine example provides a
product that can be readily transformed into the corresponding
primary amine and will be useful for downstream diversifica-
tion, for example, to non-alkyl N-substituted ATAEs (Figure
1A). A selection of α-branched alkylamines substituted with
saturated heterocyclic groups also performed well as coupling
partners (4o−4r). Of particular note was the deployment of a
N-Boc-protected piperidine-derived primary amine, which gave
an orthogonally protected ATAE suitable for further
functionalization using classical transformations. We identified
some primary amines that generated product but in low yield
(4s−4x). In particular, reactions with aniline or alkyl amines
with proximal electron withdrawing groups or amines bearing
electron deficient aromatic moieties resulted in byproduct
formation arising from reductive amination. The use of
methylamine proved to be problematic due to difficulties
associated with handling a gaseous reagent on a laboratory
scale; unfortunately, the use of the commercial hydrochloride
salt was complicated by its insolubility in the reaction solvent
and resulted in no reaction.
We also noted that reactions involving amines displaying
proximal basic sites, such as pendant tertiary amine, failed to
record any product formation, most likely due to the electron
withdrawing effects of the, inevitably, protonated functionality
formed under the reaction conditions.
Next, we examined the preliminary scope in the nature of
the α-ketoester component. First, an efficient protocol for the
assembly of these substrates was required. By adapting
procedures reported by the groups of Overman18a and Yo
and Wang,18b we were able to effectively render these versatile
building blocks readily available by following a straightforward
two-step method starting from a representative aldehyde (5b)
and an α-(OTBS)-substituted Wadsworth−Horner−Emmons
reagent (6). A variety of aldehydes were smoothly transformed
to the trisubstituted enol silane in good yields. Treatment of
this intermediate with CsF and 1 equiv of acetic acid afforded
Table 1. Selected Optimization for CAA to All-Alkyl ATAEs
a
R3Si−H (3 equiv)
acid (equiv)
solvent yield 4a, %
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
(Me3Si)3Si−H
(Me3Si)3Si−H
(Me3Si)3Si−H
(Me3Si)3Si−H
(Me3Si)3Si−H
Et3Si−H
TBS-OTf (1 equiv)
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
MeCN
DCE
0
15
39
53
85
0
0
0
28
61
0
EtCO2H (0.2 equiv)
EtCO2H (0.2 equiv)
EtCO2H (1 equiv)
EtCO2H (1 equiv)
EtCO2H (1 equiv)
EtCO2H (1 equiv)
EtCO2H (1 equiv)
EtCO2H (1 equiv)
EtCO2H (1 equiv)
EtCO2H (1 equiv)
EtCO2H (1 equiv)
b
b
Ph3Si−H
PhSiH3
(Me3Si)3Si−H
(Me3Si)3Si−H
(Me3Si)3Si−H
(Me3Si)3Si−H
(Me3Si)3Si−H
MeOH
EtOAc
THF
15
10
a
Yields were determined by 1H NMR using 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
as internal standard. Primary amine 1a, α-ketoester 2a, and EtCO2H
were stirred for 3 h before the addition of isopropyl iodide 3a and
(Me3Si)3Si−H, and iradiation was with visible light.
b
omission of TBS−OTf (entry 2). On testing alternative means
to promote the reaction, the combination of 0.2 equiv of
EtCO2H, 4 Å molecular sieves, and 3 equiv of (Me3Si)3Si−H
was found to affect CAA between 1a, 2a. and 3a to give a 39%
yield of ATAE 4a, when irradiated with a 40 W Kessel lamp for
6 h (entry 3); the addition of EtCO2H was believed to
facilitate imine formation. An assessment of the reaction
parameters ultimately revealed an optimal procedure that
involved stirring a dichloromethane solution of primary amine
1a (1 equiv), α-ketoester 2a (2 equiv), and EtCO2H (1 equiv)
for 3 h before adding isopropyl iodide 3a (3 equiv) and
(Me3Si)3Si−H (3 equiv) and reaction under visible-light
1
irradiation for 6 h, which produced an 85% yield (by H
NMR) of the desired ATAE 4a (entry 5). The role of
1601
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 1598−1609