˜
T. A. S. BRANDAO ET AL.
3
74
z
strongly negative ÁS value (ꢂ33.5 e.u.) for the hydro-
lysis in pure water in the absence of ꢀ-CD indicates that
the transition state is highly hydrated relative to the
ground state. This value is considerably more negative
than that observed in the presence of the CD catalyst
benzoate ion. Hence it is possible that the reaction
proceeds via general base catalysis promoted by the
ionized secondary hydroxyl group of ꢀ-CD (the pK of
a
this OH group is ꢇ12). Alternatively, the attack of the
hydroxide ion on the substrate encapsulated in the CD
could be a competitive route and this particular pathway
(
ꢂ21.4 e.u.). Thus, the reaction slows owing to the
z
ꢂ1
29
increase in ÁH by 4.4 kcal mol (1 kcal ¼ 4.184 kJ),
which more than compensates the increase in activation
entropy. It is important to consider that, in the ꢀ-CD
cavity, there are considerable water-structure effects,
which will appear strongly in the more hydrated structure
of the transition state. Hence the loss of hydration of the
transition state, relative to the ground state, is most prob-
ably promoted by a solvent organization effect in the CD
cavity, which in turn produces a less negative activation
entropy (Table 2).
has been confirmed by Breslow et al. The value of the
solvent isotope effect of 3.7 is fully consistent with the
proposed mechanism since the final approximation of the
hydroxide ion to the reacting carbonyl carbon will be
assisted by at least two water molecules. Hence the
observed isotope effect is consistent with the participa-
tion of several water molecules, which stabilize the
transition state of the reaction through hydrogen bonding;
various models which account for this participation have
3
0,31
been proposed.
molecules in the ground state and in the transition state
The contribution of several water
The increase in ionic strength at pH 6.0, in the absence
of ꢀ-CD, caused a small decrease in the rate constant for
the hydrolysis reaction, which could be attributed to un-
specific effects and changes in the structure of the sol-
vent. In the presence of ꢀ-CD, the ionic strength effect at
pH 6.0 is more pronounced, but the observed effect is
complex since it could be the result of the sum of solvent-
structure effects and an important salting-out effect
favoring the equilibrium towards the inclusion complex
Fig. 5).
In order to understand the mechanism of Bz O hydro-
lysis in the region where the hydroxide ion reaction
predominates in aqueous solutions, we examined the re-
action in the presence of ꢀ-CD at pH 8.0, where a cata-
lytic effect is observed (Figs 1 and 2). In this respect, the
z
is consistent with the negative ÁS value (ꢂ20.2 e.u.) for
the hydrolysis in pure water in the absence of ꢀ-CD,
which again indicates higher hydration of the transition
state relative to the ground state. In the presence of the
CD catalyst, the activation entropy is ꢂ13.2 e.u.; there-
fore, the catalytic effect is the result of a large increase in
activation entropy, which compensates the increase in
z
ꢂ1
ÁH of 1.6 kcal mol . As discussed above, the water-
structure effects in the ꢀ-CD cavity appear strongly in the
transition state. It is interesting that in the water reaction,
the activation enthalpy dominates the overall effect,
whereas in the region of pH 8.0, it is the activation
entropy that is responsible for the catalytic phenomenon
(Table 2).
(
2
Bz O hydrolysis reaction is similar to the hydrolysis of
2
In conclusion, it is important to emphasize that the
observed effects of ꢀ-CD on the hydrolysis of Bz O, i.e.
trifluoroacetate and acetate esters, which show inhibition
of the reaction at pH 6 and catalysis at pH 9. The authors
suggested that this fact is related to, and depends on, the
binding strength between the substrate and the CD rela-
tive to the transition state. When the binding of the sub-
strate was stronger than that of the transition state,
2
inhibition of the water reaction and catalysis in the basic
region, are related to the fact that different mechanisms
are operative in these regions. At pH 6.0 an increase in
activation enthalpy is responsible for the observed inhi-
bition of the water reaction, whereas at pH 8.0 the activa-
tion entropy is responsible for the observed catalysis of
the basic hydrolysis of benzoic anhydride.
2
7,28
inhibition was observed.
Clearly, this is not the case
in the hydrolysis of Bz O. In fact, we have two different
2
reactions under the selected pH conditions. Whereas
inhibition of the water reaction is observed at pH 6.0,
catalysis of the hydroxide ion reaction is observed at pH
EXPERIMENTAL
8
.0. Since the reactions are completely different, we con-
Materials. Bz O was prepared and purified as indicated
2
32
tend that the reasons for the observed catalysis and/or
inhibition are mechanistic in nature.
The cleavage of esters has been studied extensively
and, in general, the hydrolysis of aryl esters follows a
mechanism of acyl transfer to an ionized secondary hydr-
in the literature. The ꢀ-CD (Lot C6003-1, MW 1135)
was obtained from Cerestar (USA) with >99% purity and
ꢀ
was dehydrated under vacuum at 100 C for 3 h before use.
All other reagents and solvents were of analytical grade
and freshly prepared distilled water was used throughout.
1,2,4–6
oxyl group of the CD.
In the reaction of benzoic
anhydride, the ionized secondary hydroxyl group of ꢀ-CD
could be reacting as a mechanistic general base-type cata-
lyst or through nucleophilic catalysis. Nucleophilic cata-
lysis can be ruled out because the final absorbance is
consistent with the formation of 2 mol of benzoate. The
benzoylated CD shows a slower rate of hydrolysis and a
much higher molar absorptivity compared with the
Kinetic procedure. The kinetic determinations were car-
ried out in aqueous solution and the temperature and
ionic strength used were varied. Rates of hydrolysis of
benzoic anhydride were followed spectrophotometrically
by monitoring the disappearance of Bz O at 245 nm by
2
using a Hitachi U-2000 UV–visible spectrophotometer
fitted with a thermostated water-jacketed cell holder.
Copyright # 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2004; 17: 370–375